# Post ts_112754421167286687 - Post ID: `ts_112754421167286687` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2024-07-09T03:32:08.456Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112754421167286687 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112754421167286687/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_112754421167286687.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > PART 1 of 2 WITH SEAN HANNITY… ## What the media says **Video transcript** (13:19), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his: > >> And tonight chaos is brewing the Democratic Party as calls for Joe Biden to drop out are growing. Joining us now for an exclusive interview on the phone, former President Donald Trump. Mr. President, great to have you, sir. How are you? >> Well, thank you very much, John, I'm fine, thank you. >> Let's go back to the debate with you and President Biden, because immediately you can notice his voice was raspy. But beyond that, within minutes, I could tell this was not going to be a good night for Joe Biden. What was going through your head at that time? >> Well, it was a big evening and you could feel a lot of energy, boy, energy like you haven't felt in a long time. On any of the debates, I've done a lot of debates and we've had great success with debates, but this was something very special for whatever reason, it just seemed big. But when I got to Atlanta and this was at CNN headquarters, there was a lot of excitement. There were trucks, I call them the $10 million trucks, that's what the antennas all over and very incredible equipment, I'm looking at things that are, you know, it's just more of a scene than it normally would be. And it really was that way right from the start, right from the moment they introduced us and then they introduced him and introduced me and I walked out on his arm and he looked extremely pale, to put it nicely. And I don't know, maybe it was a good makeup job or maybe it wasn't, but he was a very pale looking man. And when he started to speak, I don't know, I thought his voice was weak, I didn't know exactly what was happening, it was strange. I do have to say that the CNN, Jake and Dana, they were really, they were pretty good. They were, they really, they were, I thought they were fair. I thought they were fair and the questions I thought to him to me, but it was a strange evening. I will tell you, it was a strange debate because within a couple of minutes the answers given by him were, they didn't, they didn't make a lot of sense. Well, let me ask you this. I think some of the worst moments for President Biden were when he wasn't talking, there was like this blank vacant stare and like he was checked out and I've run a montage of it. When you were speaking and you'd look over, did you notice that too or? You know, I was thinking about what I was saying. I wasn't looking over at him almost at all, except when he went a little bit haywire. I didn't look at him at all and I'm very disappointed in him. He's the worst president in the history of our country. We've never had anything like it. What he's done to our borders, what he's done to our, our country, inflation, the people that he's hurting, he's destroying social security, destroying social security. And people are, you know, I'm just so upset with him as president and so I wasn't really looking over. I purposely wasn't and I did take a couple of peaks when he was in the midst of giving some really bad answers that they weren't even answers, they were just words put together that no meaning or sense. But for the most part, I didn't really look over. Since before the 2020 election on radio and TV, I have chronicled the fact that Joe looked weak and frail and that he was a cognitive mess long before the election in 2020. The media, I call the state run media, Democrats, they're all acting shock like this just came out of nowhere. Is this one incident or is it, you know, is this, is this something permanent? I'm like, did they not notice the guy can't give a press conference? Did they not notice that he doesn't use the big boy stairs getting on Air Force One? Did they not notice the plan to surround him as he walks to and from Marine One? That he wouldn't do a Super Bowl interview, a layup interview for any president, really. What part of his cognitive decline do you think they missed or did they purposely cover for him in your view? Well, they cover for him and they still are sort of covering, but now it's getting very difficult to do that. And you know, it looks to me like he may very well stay and he's got an ego and he doesn't want to quit. He doesn't want to do that. It just looks to me like that's what he wants. I think Jill would like to see him stay. She's having a good time. I notice she really seems to be having a good time and I'm hearing that Hunter is calling the shots. So this isn't necessarily a very positive thing for our country. But I think he, you know, might very well stay in. And if he does, nobody wants to give that up that way. He's going to feel badly about himself for a long time. It's hard to give, give it up that way, the way where they're trying to force him out. So I mean, you really have to speak to his doctors, but obviously he's been sheltered by the fake news media. That's why they call it the fake news. Do you Mr. President, do you want Joe Biden to step aside? Do you care? Well we prepared for him, but I don't think it's going to matter. We have, we had a great four years. Our border was the strongest ever. Our economy pre-COVID was incredible, the best ever. But then when we got hit with the gift from China, the China virus that came in and we did a fantastic job and we got it back with the stock market was actually higher to just prior to COVID coming in. So I mean, we we've done a job by the military. We defeated ISIS, took out the worst terrorists in the world and defeated ISIS said that was a big thing. I was told it would take five years and it took us a couple of months. The military is fantastic. By the way, the military is not woke. The people that top are woke, but the military is never going to be woke. Those are incredible people. What they did for me in the fight on ISIS. And then we had no wars. I mean, I had no wars. We're heading into World War Three, in my opinion, with this man semi running things because he's not running things. The people that surround the Oval Office, the people that surround the resolute desk, the beautiful resolute desk, they're really running things in Washington, I suspect, and it's very bad. And, you know, he he got them into the warfare and lawfare, many different terms you can use, but basically going after your political opponent, using the Justice Department, using local DAs, using local attorney generals, going after your political opponent. Nobody's ever seen anything like that. And, you know, there are those I just read an article that it was up. It's been a positive for me, but it's not a positive. It's very unfair. It's fighting an unfair battle. But he's the one that got us into that. And all these lawsuits you see and everything else, that's all Biden inspired, meaning Biden people inspired. And it's a very sad, I think it's a very sad time for our country. We're not respected anywhere in the world. He's not respected. And our country is in very serious trouble. And I'll tell you what, if we're not careful, we're going to be right in the middle of World War Three. And that will be a war like nobody's seen before because of the weaponry. The weaponry is a whole lot different than two army tanks going up against each other. This is a whole different world. And we don't have somebody that can properly represent us. There's no question about that. What do you make of all the talk that if Biden steps aside or is pushed out, that it would be Vice President Harris? Do you expect that much would change? Well, I think that it will be her. I think they are very concerned about the vote if it's not her. They are very, very, I mean, they're gun shy. They don't want to do it any other way. I've actually come to believe that's what they're going to do. I think she's an ineffective person. She was in charge of the border. She's never been there. She didn't do a good job and she hasn't done a job on a lot of things. But it would seem to me that from a political standpoint, that's who they're going with. They're not even talking about alternatives. And it seems that if if he gets out for whatever reason, and I don't think he wants to get out, but if he gets out, it will be her. Interestingly, he's got a lot of power because he's got the delegates. You know, when you have the delegates, unless he says I'm getting out, they can't do anything to get him out other than the 25th Amendment, if they want to do it in a different route, it would be the 25th Amendment. But let's assume with not very much time left, you know, there's not much time left. And then we can straighten out our country will make our will make America great again. Right. But there's not a lot of time left. But I think unless they use the 25th Amendment, which they use in a different sense, he has all the power. He has the delegates. He doesn't have to get out. There's nothing they can do to get him out till he'll get the nomination. She got the nomination and then they'll have their meeting in Chicago, which, by the way, last week, 117 people were shot and 17 people were killed. That was last weekend in Chicago. And that's like that's like a war zone. But they have their convention in Chicago. And they're obviously very proud of Chicago. And I love Chicago. I have investments in Chicago, but when you look at the crime in Chicago, when you look at what's gone wrong with Chicago, it's it's not a very good thing to be displaying right now. I I still think every every election is about the future. It's about peace and prosperity. In this case, it would be about the border. It will be about the economy, law and order, the green agenda, America's role in the world. The one issue that pops almost at the top of every poll in the minds of Americans, well, really, to the border and the economy. Let's start with the border. We have nearly 11 million unvetted Joe Biden illegal immigrants in this country from nearly one hundred and eighty countries, but many from countries that have terrorized countries like Iran and Syria, Egypt, Afghanistan, Venezuela, Kazakhstan, nearly nearly sixty thousand from China in just the last 18 months, tens of thousands from Russia. And and I worry that this is now a clear and present danger for the country and that the likelihood the terror cells are probably already here is very high. I don't think I'm wrong. I pray to God that I'm wrong. I don't believe I am. And the media Democrats, you know, have ignored the issue and they've allowed it to happen. And Biden and Kamala Harris and Mayorkas have all said the borders closed and the borders secure, but they brag about ending the policies that you had in place when they got into power. I think a preventable preventable problem. I'm worried about our national security like never before. Well, the one thing you haven't said tonight that you always say is that it's one hundred percent certain that we're going to have a terror attack. And I agree with you on that. It's one hundred percent certain. I mean, we're letting I always say I pray I'm wrong. I put it into our country at a level that we've never seen before. Terrorists are coming in and they're coming in, Sean, from mental institutions and insane salams, they're coming in from prisons and jails from all over the world, all over the world, not just South America. They're coming in from the Congo and Africa. They're coming in from every part of the world. And some of these parts are rough parts of the world. And they're pouring into our country as prisoners, as mental patients. They're coming into our country and they're coming in also as terrorists. And this is poisoning our country and nobody should have been subjected to this. They should never have been allowed to do this. There's nothing good that can come of it. And we're going to have to get these criminals. And a lot of them are criminals and very high level, very bad criminals. We're going to get them out. We're going to have the largest deportation in our history, larger than the Eisenhower deportation. And we have no choice. I don't want to do that. But this man has destroyed our country. And I say in rallies, I'm doing a big one tomorrow at the rail in Miami, I say at rallies that you could take the 10 worst presidents in the history of our country and put them together. They will not have done the destruction and damage as this man has done. He's been a horrible president, the worst president, frankly, the worst president in history by far. And by the way, Jimmy Carter is the happiest guy around because Jimmy Carter now is saying, you know, I mean, he was like a genius compared to what Biden is. His administration was brilliant compared to the Biden administration. So it's a very, very sad. It's a very sad time in our country. ## Media - video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/112/754/420/583/846/413/original/ee960ca89dd5b8e9.mp4 ## Engagement - Likes: 12,443 - Reposts: 3,622 - Replies: 839 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.344Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-21T10:21:04.148Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ # Analysis: Truth Social Post — July 9, 2024 (03:32 UTC) — "PART 1 of 2 WITH SEAN HANNITY…" ## Preliminary Note on Content Limitations This post contains only five words plus an ellipsis and a video attachment. It is essentially a media distribution label. The analytical signal is extremely low; most frameworks below return null or minimal findings by necessity. The analysis is provided for longitudinal completeness. --- ## 1. Authorship Attribution **Local time conversion:** The NATO summit was underway in Washington, D.C. (July 9–11, 2024). Trump was not an official participant but was in the continental U.S. Eastern Daylight Time (UTC−4) places the post at **11:32 PM on July 8, 2024** — late evening, squarely within Trump's known posting window (10 PM–2 AM). **Verdict: Likely authentic or jointly produced.** The late-night timing matches Trump's authentic posting pattern. However, the content itself — a clean two-part media label with no typos, no emotional charge, no ALL CAPS beyond the title formatting — is consistent with aide-assisted media upload, where Trump may have supplied or approved the video while an aide (Scavino) handled the post mechanics. This is a common hybrid mode for video content. Confidence: **medium**. --- ## 2. Psychological State and Triggers The post provides insufficient verbal content for reliable psychological state inference. However, contextual triangulation is possible: - The immediately preceding posts (July 8) were high-intensity, legally defensive content: two lengthy Dershowitz quotations arguing the gag order violates First Amendment rights. This suggests a **narcissistic injury response** was active — specifically, the threat to his speech rights and the associated humiliation of being silenced by court order. - The Hannity interview (a trusted, sympathetic media channel) represents **supply-seeking behavior**: access to a reliable mirror for validation, a safe space where grievances can be aired without adversarial challenge. - The two-part format implies substantive duration, consistent with a subject with extensive grievances to process and an audience he expects to hold. **Narcissistic state inference:** Likely in **vulnerable-to-grandiose oscillation** — wounded by the gag order (contamination narrative: "they are silencing me"), pivoting to Hannity as a restorative supply source (grandiose reassertion). --- ## 3. Defense Mechanisms Insufficient direct text for mechanism identification. The broader context suggests **displacement** (channeling court-order frustration into media counter-narrative) and **rationalization** (framing the Dershowitz quotes as principled constitutional argument rather than personal grievance). These are inferred from series context, not this post alone. --- ## 4. Rhetorical Techniques Minimal. The "PART 1 of 2" structure performs a mild **curiosity gap / serialization** function — a common content strategy to maximize engagement by withholding completion. The trailing ellipsis ("…") reinforces open-endedness and invites continuation. This is a standard media distribution technique with no significant propaganda content in isolation. The Hannity brand invocation functions as **appeal to in-group authority**: Hannity is not a neutral journalist but a known loyalty signal to the base. Simply naming him positions this as content for true believers, not persuadable audiences. --- ## 5. Big Five / Personality Indicators Insufficient text. No actionable signal. --- ## 6. Cognitive Status No speech production sample. No words available for syntactic complexity, vocabulary, or paraphasia analysis. The five-word label cannot support cognitive assessment. **Pass.** --- ## 7. Narrative Identity By implication: Trump is positioning himself as a **speaker fighting suppression** (the gag order context), using Hannity as a platform to reclaim voice. The "with Sean Hannity" framing casts him as a sought-after subject of a significant interview rather than a litigant under restriction — a subtle **grandiose reframe** from defendant to newsmaker. --- ## 8. Danger Indicators **None.** No eliminationist language, dehumanization, or mobilization content present. --- ## 9. Gaslighting / Reality Distortion **None present** in this post. --- ## 10. Fact Checks No verifiable factual claims made. The existence of a Sean Hannity interview in two parts is a bare descriptive statement about the attached media — unverifiable from text alone but not a contested claim. --- ## Summary Post is analytically minimal — a five-word media label with video attachment. Its primary significance is contextual: it appears the night of aggressive First Amendment/gag-order content and precedes a matching Part 2, suggesting a media counter-offensive via sympathetic channel. Late-night ET timing (11:32 PM) is consistent with authentic Trump posting behavior. No clinically significant content in isolation; series context points to active supply-seeking following narcissistic injury from the gag order. No danger indicators. ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Two-part interview with Sean Hannity exists" | **Unverifiable** | Video attachment not accessible for verification; claim is descriptive of attached media | Overall Veracity: 50% ## Authorship Analysis **Uncertain** (score: 55%) ### Indicators - Late-night ET posting (11:32 PM) matches Trump's authentic window - Minimal emotional content inconsistent with purely organic Trump post - Clean formatting and no typos suggest aide involvement in upload mechanics - ALL CAPS title formatting is Trump-consistent - Trailing ellipsis ('…') is a Trump stylistic marker ## Psychological Profile ### State **Vulnerable State** **Trigger:** Supply Seeking — Criticism (Gag order / court suppression of speech) Sentiment: +0.10 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 10% - Antisocial: 0% - Paranoid: 0% - Sadism: 0% **Defense Mechanisms:** - displacement (neurotic) - rationalization (neurotic) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 0% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Hannity brand as in-group loyalty signal - Serialized content to sustain follower engagement ## Fact Checks (1) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-21._ > Two-part interview with Sean Hannity exists **UNVERIFIABLE** Video attachment not accessible for verification; claim is descriptive of attached media Overall Veracity: 50% ## Tags - media-distribution (90%) - hannity-interview (80%) - supply-seeking (40%) - late-night-post (60%) - serialized-content (50%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Morning Election Alarm Gives Way to Fox Feud and NATO Self-Myth as Trump Oscillates Through Mixed States** Trump started the day with a high-intensity alarm about non-citizen voting and the SAVE Act, including a pointed warning to "election fraudsters" that carried an intimidating edge. The afternoon shifted to a familiar grievance: Fox News airing polls he didn't like, which he called fake Democratic leaks. He cooled off by late afternoon, pivoting to a grandiose retelling of how he single-handedly saved NATO, timed to Biden's spotlight at the NATO summit in Washington. The day ended with a routine rally promo from Doral. Overall, a moderately active day defined by defensive reactions to perceived betrayals — from the voting system, from Fox News, and from the NATO narrative being told without him at the center. Full digest for 2024-07-09: https://trump.fm/date/2024-07-09/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2024, July 9). PART 1 of 2 WITH SEAN HANNITY… [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_112754421167286687 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "PART 1 of 2 WITH SEAN HANNITY…" Truth Social, 9 Jul. 2024. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_112754421167286687. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "PART 1 of 2 WITH SEAN HANNITY…," Truth Social, July 9, 2024, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_112754421167286687. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_112754421167286687 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_112754421167286687 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_112754421167286687 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2024-07-09 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112754421167286687.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._