# Post ts_112558833461078388 - Post ID: `ts_112558833461078388` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2024-06-04T14:31:36.966Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112558833461078388 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112558833461078388/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_112558833461078388.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > A MUST WATCH — LAWFARE! ## What the media says **Video transcript** (11:59), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his: > One week after Trump was convicted on all 34 bogus felony counts in New York's kangaroo court, the former president has now emerged more resolute than ever before. Take a look. I say it and it sounds beautiful, right? You know, my revenge will be success and I mean that. But it's awfully hard when you see what they've done. These people are so evil. And at the same time, the country can come together. People also say, can you bring the country together? And the answer is, yes, success will bring the country together because I had it together. Now, the momentum is certainly building for Donald Trump. Americans on both sides of the aisle, including commentators, even on fake news, CNN, they're speaking out against what was a gross abuse of power from both Alvin Bragg and Juan Mershon, everyone else involved in this political witch hunt. And now Trump's very own fundraising numbers are through the roof. In May, the Trump campaign and the RNC hauled in a whopping one hundred and forty one million dollars, nearly double April's numbers. The campaign says 53 million was collected in the first 24 hours after Trump's conviction. Twenty five percent of those donors, first time contributors. And while Biden only leaves home for tiny, barely attended, short, heavily scripted events, his twenty twenty four opponent, Donald Trump, just attended a UFC fight in New Jersey. He was warmly greeted. The place was jamming, packed, having fun, clapping. Very happy he was there. Anyway, this is in the Prudential Center. By the way, anybody want to see Joe Biden go to a major sporting event? Probably get booed right out of the stadium. Few Americans actually even really like Joe Biden. They know he's been a complete failure as your president. And that's why Democrats are now resorting to law fair weaponized in the DOJ. That's why they're in a full fledged panic. Trump is now calling on the Supreme Court to act before his sentencing. Otherwise, Albin Braggs political con job. All that will need to slowly work its way through a variety of liberal New York courts filled with partisan judges who ate Donald Trump. This law fair deserves to be rectified before the election. These questions must be answered. Did Alvin Bragg withhold exculpatory evidence from the indicting grand jury? Was Biden donor Judge Mershawn obligated to recuse himself? What about the family conflicts? Were Donald Trump's Sixth Amendment rights violated by not telling him the crime that he was even being charged with? We didn't know to the end of the trial if we even know at this point. Did the judge allow prejudicial information during the trial? Did New York even have jurisdiction on a federal election law? Did the judge violate not one but two Supreme Court decisions, the latest in 2020, Ramos versus Louisiana in his jury instructions that very clearly mandated unanimity of the jury on all issues. You can't have four, four and four, as we have described. This law fair blatant abuse of power, it cannot stand. And meanwhile, we are monitoring yet another legal case. This one out of Delaware, Joe Biden loves to say nobody's above the law, but he might be soon singing a very different tune now that his very own son is facing the possibility of real prison time. Now this morning, Hunter Biden's felony gun trial finally got underway. He's accused of lying on a gun application. Why? In order to purchase a firearm, despite his ongoing drug abuse, now this very same firearm in question was ultimately recovered in a dumpster near a school. It was put there by his brother's former wife, his girlfriend at the time. And unlike the law fair in New York, well, there are no cooked up charges or aggressive prosecutors campaigning on we're going to get Hunter Biden. No, to the contrary, just the opposite of what you saw in New York. This trial features actual evidence, numerous credible witnesses. And if I'd argue anything, I'd probably say the deck is stacked in his favor. He's a Biden in Delaware. Take a look. The witnesses is brutal for Hunter Biden. It includes his ex-wife. It includes the wife of the late Beau Biden with whom Hunter had a relationship after Beau's death. It includes, I believe, another even woman that has an issue with Hunter Biden here. I mean, that's tough stuff for Hunter here. Why would you want to go through that? I don't think he would. And I think everything here that's going to be presented is very damaging. All right. Despite the evidence for a while, Hunter Biden appeared above the law. This is a trial that was never supposed to happen. Remember, according to the New York Times, the DOJ's original plan was to charge Hunter with nothing, sweep all of these misdeeds under the rug. And for a while, it was all going along. According to plan, federal prosecutor David Weiss dragged on what appeared to be a fake investigation for years. Remember, he allowed the statute of limitations to run out on several serious tax crimes. Conveniently, we call them the Burisma years. He then reportedly seemed content to wrap up the probe without any charges. Then a little problem happened. Whistleblowers at the IRS, they sounded the alarm. Weiss, the DOJ, had to move to plan B. What was plan B? That was the sweetheart Weiss deal masquerading as justice. Never before in the history of the country has a deal ever been that sweet. Even the defense being asked by the judge in the courtroom, did you ever see anything like a deal like this ever before? And they had to admit, no, no felony tax charges, no jail time, a deferred meaningless gun charge and nothing else. But unfortunately for Hunter, the plea deal collapsed after the federal judge starting actually started to actually ask real questions in a statement Biden referred to his son as inspiring. By the way, I'm glad that he did get off drugs. I hope he stays off them. You don't want that for anybody. But of course we want Hunter to get a fair trial and we trust that, well, Delaware might lean his way. No American, whether your name is Biden or Trump, should have to face a partisan witch hunt. And of course no one in the Biden White House has the decency to call out the law fair against Trump. Quite the contrary. We hear they were celebrating in Biden headquarters and the White House. And by the way, why did the third highest ranking person at Joe Biden's DOJ, why would they ever leave that prestigious position to prosecute a local case against Donald Trump in New York? Clearly with a deeply involved and incompetent unpopular president, well, the Democrats, they need all the political help they can get. And this appears to be their number one strategy here with reaction. Fox News contributor, Jonathan Turley, well, I labeled a few of the areas that I've I'd identified that president Trump should appeal. I think because of the circumstances and the circumstances that I've identified, I think because of the circumstances that I've identified that president Trump should appeal, I think because of the circumstances and the circumstances that I've identified that president Trump should appeal. I think because of the circumstances and the severity of the conflicts in this case and constitutional issues that are at hand here, it should be expedited. I think the American people have a right to know if it's going to be overturned before the election. I would urge Trump's attorneys to pursue every avenue to get there. What would you advise them? Well, I think they are going to pursue every avenue. I must say I do not hold out much hope that the Supreme Court will allow them to go directly to the highest court for review. The reason is that the Supreme Court previously turned down Jack Smith, who wanted to expedite his own prosecution of Trump. And I think that some of the justices are going to want to stay within that same lane. Now that means it goes through the New York criminal system. And many of us don't have a lot of faith after this trial in that system. I think that initially, at least, he may have some tough going. But I have to tell you, I think that these errors are rather glaring and obvious. I can't imagine this verdict being sustained on review. It just may take a while. It may occur later. In fact, it may not occur until they get to the Supreme Court. But I think the Trump campaign has to assume that it will not get a final review before the election. Yeah. All right. So we have July 11 sentencing, somebody, it's a class, what, Evie felony. We had the upcharge, of course, the novel legal theory, the theory that we spoke so often about. You have somebody that's never been convicted before. Usually, I would think that somebody would be released on their own recognizance pending appeal. I suspect anything's possible with Judge Mershawn. Will he try to put him in jail and have him miss his own Republican convention? Is he going to have home confinement as part of this? How far does he go? Well, before I said in that courtroom, I would have said that all of these options were almost fanciful. I was really surprised in what I saw in that courtroom. I felt that the judge was dead wrong on a number of his decisions. He ruled very heavily towards the prosecution. Even liberal legal analysts have admitted to that. First of all, to sentence him to jail ultimately as an elderly first offender in a nonviolent crime would be just such a huge departure from the norm in Manhattan and other courts that I think that even many liberals would object, that they would say that you're adding to this notion of a special criminal system just for Trump. It's bad enough that they effectively created a crime for him, zapping a dead misdemeanor into life and coming up with this rather novel theory. In terms of any sentence being imposed before appeal, I would hope that Judge Mershawn would suspend it or allow the appeal to go forward. There are a lot of options here. If he doesn't go with a jail sentence, which I think would be absurd, there's community service, there's home confinement. In most of these cases, I think you would have a conditional dismissal, the type of go out and sin no more. You're on probation or parole and you're under court review. I think that's what most judges would view a case of this kind, but nothing that has happened in this case is how things are usually done in the criminal justice system in my view. >> Yeah. All right, Jonathan. ## Media - video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/112/558/832/042/467/633/original/023b97532becf09b.mp4 ## Engagement - Likes: 8,618 - Reposts: 2,474 - Replies: 248 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.349Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-21T09:11:26.330Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary Posted five days after his historic criminal conviction on all 34 felony counts, this four-word post ("A MUST WATCH — LAWFARE!") is a maximally compressed narcissistic defense mechanism. The term "LAWFARE" functions as a memetic weapon performing denial, projection, and reality distortion simultaneously — encapsulating an entire counter-narrative in a single word. It reframes a constitutionally conducted criminal trial as an act of political warfare, protecting the grandiose self-concept from the catastrophic narcissistic injury of public conviction. The post exhibits pathological-level denial (the conviction is not processed as a legal reality) and distortion (the entire justice system is restructured as an enemy combatant). Paranoid features are high: no acknowledgment that 12 independently selected jurors reached a unanimous verdict is possible within the "LAWFARE" frame, because the frame pre-emptively classifies all legal accountability as illegitimate. The "MUST WATCH" imperative commands follower participation as a loyalty ritual rather than offering information to evaluate. Authorship is mixed: the ALL CAPS register and battle-cry syntax are authentically Trump's voice, but 10:31 AM EDT timing (business hours at Mar-a-Lago) suggests possible aide assistance with the upload. Danger level is elevated: while no direct violence language is present, systematic legal delegitimization at this scale and intensity raises the ambient probability of follower action against judicial actors, and contributes to the epistemic closure that makes the subject's base impervious to accountability mechanisms. # Psychological Analysis: ts_112558833461078388 **Platform:** Truth Social | **Date:** 2024-06-04 | **Post-Conviction Day 5** --- ## Situational Context This post appears five days after Trump's historic conviction on all 34 felony counts in New York. The day's posting pattern (multiple short posts, link-shares, emotional outbursts visible in the Biden Middle East post) reflects a subject under acute psychological stress managing a catastrophic narcissistic injury through high-volume output and delegitimization rhetoric. --- ## Level 1: Dispositional Traits The four-word post is too brief for robust trait profiling, but what is observable is consistent with established patterns: - **Neuroticism (angry hostility)**: The ALL CAPS register and exclamatory punctuation signal elevated emotional arousal. The conviction is a maximum stressor. - **Extraversion (assertiveness)**: Imperative mood ("MUST WATCH") is commanding, not inviting. - **Agreeableness (low)**: Zero acknowledgment of any validity to the legal process. - **Conscientiousness (low/impulsive)**: Posting is reactive, part of a high-volume emotional output day. - **Openness (low/closed)**: "LAWFARE" is a closed interpretive frame — no alternative readings are permitted. --- ## Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations **Agency motives dominate entirely.** The post is about power, control, and resistance to accountability. Communion motives are vestigial (the thanking of "Patriots" in the previous post shows audience-bonding but instrumentally). **Active schemas:** - *Self-schema*: I am the legitimate target of an illegitimate system; I am persecuted because I am powerful and effective. - *World-schema*: Legal institutions are weapons deployed by political enemies; "law" and "warfare" are now synonymous in this context. - *Other-schema*: Followers are fellow victims and warriors; prosecutors/judges/jurors are enemy combatants. --- ## Level 3: Narrative Identity **Protagonist role:** Martyr-Warrior hybrid. The conviction is being narratively absorbed into a contamination sequence: *legitimate presidency → politically motivated persecution → eventual vindication*. "LAWFARE" names the contamination agent. **Contamination sequence in progress:** The good (his presidency, his "victories") is being destroyed by bad actors using corrupt legal mechanisms. This narrative structure protects identity coherence against the threat of criminal accountability. **Identity claim (implicit):** *I am so powerful and threatening to the corrupt establishment that they must use the law itself as a weapon against me.* This inverts the conviction from evidence of wrongdoing into evidence of importance. **Contrasting other:** The nameless architects of "LAWFARE" — prosecutors, Biden administration, "radical left." The specificity doesn't matter; the category does. --- ## Level 4: Clinical Indicators ### Malignant Narcissism (Kernberg) **A. Narcissistic features (high, 0.88):** The post rejects any possibility that the conviction reflects actual wrongdoing. The grandiosity is structural: only an existential enemy would need to deploy the entire legal system against him. **B. Antisocial features (moderate-high, 0.72):** "LAWFARE" implicitly frames compliance with legal outcomes as naive or complicit. This contributes to a posture of law-as-obstacle rather than law-as-constraint. **C. Paranoid features (high, 0.85):** The conviction is not processed as a legal outcome but as a coordinated attack. Paranoid ideation is ego-syntonic and publicly endorsed. **D. Ego-syntonic sadism (low, 0.20):** Not prominently expressed in this post; the affect is more victimhood-adjacent than triumphalist. ### Defense Mechanisms **Denial (pathological):** The word "LAWFARE" is itself an act of denial — the conviction is not real as a legal matter; it is only real as a political attack. The jury, the evidence, the judge: all are erased beneath this single reframing word. **Distortion (pathological):** Reality is not merely denied but actively reshaped. A constitutionally conducted trial with an independently selected jury becomes indistinguishable from an act of war. **Projection (immature):** The accusation that the justice system is "weaponized" mirrors precisely what critics, and Trump himself, have promised to do with the DOJ if re-elected — prosecute political opponents. The unacceptable impulse is relocated outward. ### Narcissistic Dynamics **Trigger:** Narcissistic injury of the highest magnitude — public criminal conviction, first in U.S. presidential history. The injury is to both grandiose self-image and literal legal standing. **Rage:** Present at high intensity (0.82). Proportionality is low (0.30) — the response is not calibrated to a specific grievance but is a global delegitimization of an entire legal proceeding. **Narcissistic state:** Mixed. The vulnerable pole (persecution, martyrdom) and the grandiose pole (warrior, fighter, too important to be stopped by ordinary law) are oscillating within the same post. "LAWFARE" holds both: I am attacked (vulnerable) and I will expose it (grandiose). --- ## Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis "LAWFARE" is a memetic compression device. It performs in four words what would otherwise require paragraphs of argumentation: 1. **Delegitimizes** the legal process entirely 2. **Reframes** accountability as aggression 3. **Activates** tribal grievance without requiring logical scaffolding 4. **Demands** follower performance (sharing, watching, affirming) The "MUST WATCH" imperative is not informational — followers are not being offered information to evaluate. They are being commanded to participate in a collective ritual of outrage. Watching the video *is the loyalty act*. The RAND Firehose model is visible at the day level: this is one of multiple posts on June 4 maintaining high-volume output across different attack vectors (Middle East, Biden, legal delegitimization). Volume itself is a rhetorical weapon — exhaustion of critical response through saturation. --- ## Gaslighting & Reality Distortion **Epistemic closure:** "LAWFARE" is a closed frame. Within it, any legal action against Trump is definitionally corrupt. There is no evidence that could, in principle, justify a conviction — because the frame pre-emptively classifies all convictions as political. This is epistemically totalizing. **Reality distortion:** The post participates in a broader gaslighting campaign documented across the post-conviction week — the press conference calling it a "rigged" trial, the absence of any acknowledgment that 12 jurors independently reached a unanimous verdict. --- ## Archetypal Analysis **Victim/Martyr:** Primary archetype activated. The conviction is framed as unjust suffering inflicted by corrupt power. Martyrdom elevates the subject's moral status. **Warrior:** Secondary archetype. "MUST WATCH" is a battle cry; the dash before "LAWFARE!" creates a reveal structure — here is the enemy, named. **Shadow projection:** What is disowned — the use of power to circumvent law, the willingness to bend institutions — is projected wholesale onto prosecutors and the Biden administration. The Shadow is always fighting "LAWFARE" against him; he is never its practitioner. **Trickster absence:** Notably, the Trickster register (disruptive humor, chaos energy) is absent here. The affect is earnest grievance, not playful disruption. This is consistent with a subject in genuine psychological distress rather than strategic chaos-sowing. --- ## Cognitive Status **Assessable markers:** Minimal data from a 4-word post. No phonemic paraphasia, tangentiality, or name confusion observable. Complexity score is low by necessity of format, not necessarily by cognitive limitation. **Baseline comparison:** The brevity and ALL CAPS style is entirely consistent with Trump's documented posting behavior across 2017–present. No deviation from established baseline in what is observable. **Note:** Longitudinal cognitive assessment requires longer-form samples. This post is insufficient for meaningful cognitive status inference. --- ## Authorship Attribution **Assessment: Mixed/hybrid (authentic Trump framing, possible aide-assisted posting)** - **10:31 AM EDT** at Mar-a-Lago — business hours is a Scavino indicator - **ALL CAPS, exclamatory, single-word battle cry** — authentic Trump register - **Video share format** — consistent with Scavino media amplification workflow - Most likely: Trump provided the caption verbally or typed it; aide handled upload - Confidence: medium (brevity limits stylometric confidence) --- ## Danger Assessment **Level: Elevated** The post does not contain direct violent imagery or eliminationist language. However, "LAWFARE" contributes systematically to: 1. **Delegitimization of legal institutions** — normalizes non-compliance with legal outcomes 2. **Epistemic closure** — forecloses rational engagement with accountability mechanisms 3. **Grievance amplification** — the video content (unverifiable here) likely intensifies persecution narrative for viewers already activated by conviction news 4. **Pre-violence rhetoric precursor pattern:** While this single post is not stochastic terrorism, it is one element in an extended pattern of portraying the legal system as an enemy combatant — a pattern that, at scale, raises the probability of follower violence against legal actors The "MUST WATCH" imperative with an unverified video is also a vector risk: followers are commanded to consume and share content whose message is unknown but whose frame (LAWFARE) is pre-loaded to produce outrage. --- ## Shared Psychosis Dynamics The post participates in the construction of an alternative epistemic reality in which criminal convictions are, by definition, political persecution. Followers who accept "LAWFARE" as their interpretive frame have, in effect, made it impossible for any legal accountability to penetrate — because the frame classifies all accountability as illegitimate aggression. This is epistemic closure functioning as a shared delusional system: the in-group test is acceptance of the conviction's illegitimacy; the out-group marker is acknowledging the jury's verdict as valid. ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "Implicit claim that the New York prosecution constitutes 'LAWFARE' (politically motivated legal persecution rather than legitimate prosecution)" | **Mostly False** | The prosecution was initiated by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, a state-level official; the case involved documentary evidence of falsified business records; 12 independently selected jurors unanimously found guilt on all 34 counts after deliberation. While critics debate prosecutorial prioritization, no credible evidence of White House coordination with state prosecutors has been established. The term 'LAWFARE' implies coordination and political motivation as established facts, which they are not. | Overall Veracity: 20% ## Authorship Analysis **Uncertain** (score: 62%) ### Indicators - ALL CAPS throughout consistent with authentic Trump emotional register - Exclamatory single-word framing ('LAWFARE!') matches Trump's battle-cry syntax - Posted 10:31 AM EDT (Mar-a-Lago local time) — business hours favors aide/Scavino - Extreme brevity is ambiguous: could be Trump dashing off a caption, or Scavino teeing up a video - Posting pattern on this date shows high volume of short link-shares, consistent with Scavino media amplification workflow ## Psychological Profile ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (New York criminal conviction on all 34 felony counts, May 30, 2024) **Rage:** Intensity 82% targeting Federal/state legal system, prosecution team, Biden administration by implication - Proportionality: 30% Sentiment: -0.72 **Mildly Hypomanic** - High-volume posting day (multiple posts across varied attack vectors) consistent with pressured output - ALL CAPS register and exclamatory punctuation suggest elevated arousal state - Rapid cycling between victimhood and warrior postures within and across posts on this date ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 88% - Antisocial: 72% - Paranoid: 85% - Sadism: 20% **Defense Mechanisms:** - denial (pathological) - distortion (pathological) - projection (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 15% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Imperative 'MUST WATCH' commands followers' attention as loyalty performance - Shared video creates communal experience of grievance reinforcement - Single-word exclamation functions as tribal shibboleth — followers are expected to understand and share the outrage without explanation ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - Systematic delegitimization of legal institutions ('LAWFARE') normalizes non-compliance with judicial outcomes - Epistemic closure frame: any legal accountability is pre-classified as persecution, making rational engagement impossible - High-volume post-conviction day amplifies grievance saturation across the base - Unverified video content commanded as 'MUST WATCH' — unknown content amplified through persecution frame to already-activated audience - Pattern contribution to anti-judicial sentiment that historically precedes threats against legal actors ### Gaslighting - 'LAWFARE' framing denies validity of unanimous jury verdict without engaging any specific evidence - Participation in documented post-conviction campaign portraying constitutionally conducted trial as 'rigged' and 'disgraceful' - Epistemic closure construction: followers required to accept conviction's illegitimacy as group membership test - No acknowledgment of jury independence or evidentiary standard — reality of conviction is simply erased ## Fact Checks (1) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-21._ > Implicit claim that the New York prosecution constitutes 'LAWFARE' (politically motivated legal persecution rather than legitimate prosecution) **MOSTLY FALSE** The prosecution was initiated by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, a state-level official; the case involved documentary evidence of falsified business records; 12 independently selected jurors unanimously found guilt on all 34 counts after deliberation. While critics debate prosecutorial prioritization, no credible evidence of White House coordination with state prosecutors has been established. The term 'LAWFARE' implies coordination and political motivation as established facts, which they are not. Sources: Known events: Trump Found Guilty on All 34 Felony Counts (provided); Known events: Republicans Rally to Trump's Defense (provided) Overall Veracity: 20% ## Tags - post-conviction (100%) - lawfare (95%) - narcissistic-injury (92%) - institutional-delegitimization (90%) - epistemic-closure (88%) - denial-pathological (87%) - supply-seeking (75%) - video-amplification (70%) - aide-assisted (55%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Five Days After Historic Conviction, Trump Oscillates Between Martyr and Messiah in 27-Post Psychological Storm** Trump spent the day processing his historic 34-count felony conviction from five days earlier, posting 27 times from Mar-a-Lago. The morning brought a rapid-fire burst of posts swinging between defiant rage and wounded victimhood, including a declaration that he is a "political prisoner of a failing nation." By afternoon, aides appeared to take over the account with a string of routine endorsements and a new voter mobilization initiative that quietly reversed years of opposition to mail-in voting. The day's most striking feature was total silence about the conviction itself — never once acknowledged directly, only processed through displacement, projection, and persecution framing. Full digest for 2024-06-04: https://trump.fm/date/2024-06-04/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2024, June 4). A MUST WATCH — LAWFARE! [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_112558833461078388 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "A MUST WATCH — LAWFARE!" Truth Social, 4 Jun. 2024. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_112558833461078388. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "A MUST WATCH — LAWFARE!," Truth Social, June 4, 2024, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_112558833461078388. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_112558833461078388 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_112558833461078388 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_112558833461078388 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2024-06-04 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112558833461078388.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._