# Post ts_112067146342386949 - Post ID: `ts_112067146342386949` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2024-03-09T18:29:06.864Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112067146342386949 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112067146342386949/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_112067146342386949.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > “...in my view, the action civil fraud action brought against former President Donald Trump was a case of selective prosecution of a victimless crime brought because of Trump’s political views, and because he is the de facto nominee of the Republican Party in the 2024 presidential election. Selective prosecution raises both due process and equal protection clause issues of the kind that led the Framers to ban Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto laws, which clauses are also relevant here.” https://reason.com/volokh/2024/02/23/former-president-donald-trumps-new-york-state-civil-fraud-verdict/ ## Engagement - Likes: 8,663 - Reposts: 2,398 - Replies: 327 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.366Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-21T05:00:05.153Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary This post is entirely a quoted passage from the Volokh Conspiracy legal blog, authored by staff rather than Trump. Its psychological significance lies in editorial selection: the NY civil fraud verdict ($364M+ judgment, Feb 16, 2024) represented an acute narcissistic injury, and this post represents the staff-mediated defensive response — deploying academic constitutional framing to validate the persecution narrative Trump expresses crudely in his own voice. The "victimless crime" formulation denies the court's adjudicated findings; the "selective prosecution" framing projects political motivation onto the judiciary. Both are rationalization and denial in constitutional costume. The post contributes to epistemic closure by providing followers with credentialed-sounding tools to reject the verdict's legitimacy. Notably, the same-day post cluster reveals characteristic oscillation: grandiose supply-seeking (Orbán dinner, rally) and rage discharge (DeNiro attack) appear alongside this vulnerable defensive post — a stable longitudinal pattern. Business-hours timing and the complete absence of authentic Trump linguistic markers confirm aide authorship. Danger level is none; rhetorical danger is moderate in the sense that authority laundering through respected legal sources is more persuasive than raw grievance and more difficult for audiences to critically evaluate. Factually, the Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto arguments are legal novelties rejected by mainstream scholarship; "victimless" misrepresents the court's findings on financial counterparty harm. # Psychological Analysis: Trump Truth Social Post — March 9, 2024 (18:29 UTC) ## Overview This post contains no original Trump text. It is entirely a quoted passage from a Volokh Conspiracy article (Eugene Volokh's law blog on Reason.com, published Feb 23, 2024) analyzing the New York civil fraud verdict. The post's psychological interest lies not in what Trump wrote but in what his team selected to amplify, and why, on this particular day. --- ## Authorship Attribution **Verdict: Strongly aide-authored (confidence: high)** Posted at 13:29 EST on a Saturday when Trump was at Mar-a-Lago (confirmed by the same-day Orbán dinner post) and preparing for a 5:00 PM rally in Rome, Georgia. Business hours, zero original Trump language, and the academic register of the content all point firmly to staff/communications team. This is a curated legal citation post — a recognized pattern in Trump's social media operation where favorable media or legal commentary is posted to reinforce the defense narrative while Trump is otherwise occupied. --- ## Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five) As the post is not authored by Trump, trait-level analysis is limited to what the *selection* of content reveals: - **Neuroticism (angry hostility / vulnerability)**: Moderate-high underlying state inferred. The NY civil fraud verdict ($364M+ judgment, February 16, 2024) was an acute stressor. This post is a defensive response to that injury — selecting content that validates the wound as unjust. - **Agreeableness (low)**: Combative framing of judiciary as partisan actor reflects persistent disagreeable orientation toward accountability structures. - **Openness (low)**: Rigid epistemic framework — legal authorities are accepted only when they validate the predetermined victimhood narrative. --- ## Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations — Motives & Schemas **Agency motive (dominance/control)**: The post attempts to reassert narrative control over the fraud verdict through constitutional legitimization. The $364M judgment represented a significant loss of financial and symbolic dominance. **Schema — Self**: Righteous victim of a corrupt political-judicial system. The "de facto nominee" framing simultaneously asserts status (front-runner) and frames that status as the cause of persecution. **Schema — World**: Zero-sum. Political opponents weaponize government institutions. Courts are not neutral arbiters but partisan instruments. **Schema — Others**: Divided into those who validate (Volokh, Gingrich, Orbán) and those who persecute (NY AG, judge). Same-day posts show this binary operating in parallel: DeNiro is "low IQ," Orbán is "a Great Leader." --- ## Level 3: Narrative Identity **Protagonist role**: Martyred front-runner — political persecution of the people's chosen candidate. **Contamination sequence**: The underlying narrative is classic contamination — electoral triumph (winning the nomination) → judicial contamination (politically motivated verdict). The sequence frames the court system as the antagonist attacking a legitimate democratic process. **Redemption arc (implied)**: Sharing constitutional analysis implies the contamination will be reversed on appeal or through electoral vindication. **Identity claims**: "De facto nominee of the Republican Party" — status assertion embedded in victimhood framing. **Contrasting other**: "Those who brought the action" — faceless political operatives weaponizing courts. --- ## Level 4: Clinical Indicators ### Narcissistic Dynamics **Trigger**: Narcissistic injury from the NY civil fraud verdict — one of the largest financial judgments against a public figure in US history. The injury was both financial (bond liability) and reputational (findings of fraudulent conduct). **State**: Vulnerable narcissistic state. Unlike grandiose posts from the same day (Orbán hosting, the rally announcement), this post reflects defensive posture — seeking external validation of victimhood rather than asserting dominance. **Rage**: Absent in this post. The same-day DeNiro post carries the rage expression that this post conspicuously sublimates into constitutional language. ### Defense Mechanisms 1. **Rationalization** (neurotic): Legal/constitutional framing transforms emotional persecution narrative into reasoned academic argument. The mechanism is sophisticated — it outsources the irrationality to a credentialed third party. 2. **Denial** (pathological): "Victimless crime" explicitly denies the court's findings. Banks, insurers, and financial counterparties were identified as potential victims; the AG argued market integrity was harmed. Calling the conduct "victimless" is a factual denial of the adjudicated record. 3. **Projection** (immature): "Selective prosecution based on political views" attributes motivated reasoning to the judiciary — projecting the accusation of political motivation outward onto the legal system. --- ## Rhetorical & Propaganda Analysis The rhetorical sophistication here exceeds Trump's typical register, confirming aide authorship. The operative technique is **authority laundering**: academic legal credibility is borrowed to validate what Trump elsewhere expresses as raw grievance ("WITCH HUNT"). **Constitutional sanctification** is the key move: by invoking Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto clauses, the post implies the Founding Fathers themselves would condemn the verdict. This is rhetorically powerful but legally questionable — both clauses apply to legislative acts, not civil judicial proceedings. **Editorial curation as rhetoric**: The entire post is a selection. No original statement is made. Framing is achieved entirely through what was chosen to amplify — an unusually indirect form of political communication suggesting a deliberate strategy of using proxies to make claims Trump would otherwise state crudely. --- ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "The civil fraud action was 'selective prosecution' based on Trump's political views" | **Unverifiable** | This is a legal opinion, not a verifiable factual claim. The NY AG disputes it entirely; no court has accepted this framing. | | "The fraud action was a 'victimless crime'" | **Mostly False** | The court found fraudulent asset inflation that affected lenders, insurers, and the integrity of financial markets. Judge Engoron's Feb 2024 ruling identified institutional victims. 'Victimless' is a contested legal argument, not an established fact. | | "Trump is the 'de facto nominee of the Republican Party in the 2024 presidential election'" | **True** | Following Super Tuesday (March 5, 2024), Trump won 14 of 15 primaries and Haley suspended her campaign, effectively clinching the nomination. | | "Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto clauses are 'relevant' to the civil fraud verdict" | **Mostly False** | Both constitutional provisions constrain legislative acts, not civil judicial proceedings. The argument is a novel legal theory not accepted by any reviewing court and criticized by mainstream constitutional scholars. | Overall Veracity: 48% ## Gaslighting & Reality Distortion **Present, moderate severity.** The "victimless crime" framing asks Trump's audience to reject the court's adjudicated findings. This is not cognitive confabulation — it is deliberate narrative construction. The post contributes to the epistemic closure ecosystem in which followers are provided authoritative-sounding tools to dismiss accountability findings as politically illegitimate. --- ## Epistemic Closure Dynamics Post contributes to shared reality distortion: a respected legal blog is used to tell followers that even credentialed legal scholars believe Trump is being persecuted. The mechanism bypasses critical evaluation — if a law professor says it, it must be true — while the underlying claim (victimless/selective) remains contested among mainstream legal scholars. --- ## Archetypal Analysis **Victim + Martyr**: The post invokes the martyr archetype — Trump as persecuted innocent whose punishment is politically motivated. Constitutional framing elevates the martyrdom from personal to historical. **Shadow projection**: The post projects corrupt political motivation onto the judiciary — Trump's own documented pattern of using legal instruments instrumentally is displaced onto the AG's office. **Order/Chaos positioning**: "Order Attacker" — the judicial system is cast as a corrupt institutional order weaponized against the legitimate democratic will. Trump implicitly positions himself as the chaos agent who exposes this corruption. --- ## Same-Day Longitudinal Context The March 9 post cluster reveals a striking psychological split: - **Grandiose pole**: Orbán hosting ("Great Leader"), rally announcement, Newt Gingrich endorsement citation — all dominance-affirming content. - **Vulnerable pole**: This legal citation post, implicitly addressing the fraud verdict — defensive, victimhood-seeking. - **Rage discharge**: The DeNiro "low IQ" attack discharges aggression that this post sublimates. This oscillation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic states on the same day is a stable pattern in the longitudinal record. --- ## Danger Assessment **None.** This is a legal citation post with no eliminationist language, dehumanization, or stochastic terrorism indicators. --- ## Cognitive Status Not assessable from aide-authored content. No Trump speech markers present for analysis. ## Authorship Analysis **Aide-Written** (score: 8%) ### Indicators - Post timing of 13:29 EST is squarely within business hours (Mar-a-Lago, UTC-5 on March 9 before DST) - Post contains zero original Trump text — 100% quoted third-party legal commentary - Formal, syntactically complex constitutional language is antithetical to Trump's documented writing style - Selecting and posting academic legal citations is a known staff/Scavino social media management pattern - Same day posts show Trump in rally mode (Rome, GA, 5pm) consistent with staff managing accounts while he prepares ## Psychological Profile ### State **Vulnerable State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (New York civil fraud verdict ($364M+ judgment, issued Feb 16, 2024)) Sentiment: -0.25 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 30% - Antisocial: 20% - Paranoid: 40% - Sadism: 0% **Defense Mechanisms:** - rationalization (neurotic) - denial (pathological) - projection (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 0% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Authority laundering (using Volokh Conspiracy credibility to validate Trump's legal victimhood narrative) - Legitimacy transfer (constitutional framers' intent invoked to position Trump as defender of founding principles) - Grievance formalization (emotional persecution narrative given legal/academic scaffold for audience consumption) ## Danger Assessment **NONE** ### Gaslighting - 'Victimless crime' framing asks audience to reject adjudicated court findings on financial harm to counterparties - Constitutional language provides authoritative-sounding scaffolding for dismissing verdict legitimacy - Selective prosecution framing attacks the perception that the legal process was neutral ## Fact Checks (4) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-21._ > The civil fraud action was 'selective prosecution' based on Trump's political views **UNVERIFIABLE** This is a legal opinion, not a verifiable factual claim. The NY AG disputes it entirely; no court has accepted this framing. Sources: New York AG v. Trump civil fraud case record > The fraud action was a 'victimless crime' **MOSTLY FALSE** The court found fraudulent asset inflation that affected lenders, insurers, and the integrity of financial markets. Judge Engoron's Feb 2024 ruling identified institutional victims. 'Victimless' is a contested legal argument, not an established fact. Sources: New York v. Trump, NY Supreme Court, Feb 2024 verdict > Trump is the 'de facto nominee of the Republican Party in the 2024 presidential election' **TRUE** Following Super Tuesday (March 5, 2024), Trump won 14 of 15 primaries and Haley suspended her campaign, effectively clinching the nomination. Sources: Super Tuesday 2024 results; Haley campaign suspension > Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto clauses are 'relevant' to the civil fraud verdict **MOSTLY FALSE** Both constitutional provisions constrain legislative acts, not civil judicial proceedings. The argument is a novel legal theory not accepted by any reviewing court and criticized by mainstream constitutional scholars. Sources: U.S. Constitution Art. I §9-10; mainstream constitutional law scholarship Overall Veracity: 48% ## Tags - aide-authored (95%) - legal-defense-narrative (90%) - narcissistic-injury-response (85%) - ny-fraud-verdict (90%) - authority-laundering (85%) - epistemic-closure (80%) - victimhood-narrative (80%) - constitutional-framing (75%) - vulnerable-narcissistic-state (70%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Post-Super Tuesday Victory Lap Meets Legal Siege Mentality in High-Output Consolidation Day** Trump spent the day consolidating his post-Super Tuesday position, mixing strongman diplomacy with campaign operations and a steady legal defense blitz. The morning opened with a boastful recap of hosting Hungarian PM Viktor Orban at Mar-a-Lago, followed by a dismissive swipe at Robert De Niro. The bulk of the afternoon was devoted to building a legal persecution narrative -- sharing sympathetic legal analysis, pushing for presidential immunity, and claiming "total exoneration" on January 6 via newly released testimony. The day ended on its sharpest note, with a high-intensity attack on Jack Smith and the Biden DOJ that reframed his own indictment as election interference by the prosecution. Overall mood was confident and combative, with vulnerability surfacing only when the legal threats came into focus. Full digest for 2024-03-09: https://trump.fm/date/2024-03-09/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2024, March 9). “...in my view, the action civil fraud action... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_112067146342386949 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "“...in my view, the action civil fraud action brought..." Truth Social, 9 Mar. 2024. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_112067146342386949. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "“...in my view, the action civil fraud action brought...," Truth Social, March 9, 2024, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_112067146342386949. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_112067146342386949 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_112067146342386949 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_112067146342386949 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2024-03-09 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_112067146342386949.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._