# Post ts_111615444771791371

- Post ID: `ts_111615444771791371`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2023-12-20T23:55:27.964Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_111615444771791371
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_111615444771791371/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_111615444771791371.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> The last time the Democrats took someone off the ballot was in 1860 - They would not allow a man named Abraham Lincoln to be so much as mentioned in “Slave States.” Gateway Pundit

## Engagement

- Likes: 21,002
- Reposts: 8,210
- Replies: 2,063
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.387Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-20T14:51:35.086Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

Responding to the Colorado Supreme Court's 4-3 ballot disqualification ruling, this post deploys a structurally sophisticated DARVO maneuver: Trump, the subject of removal, reframes "Democrats" as the historical ballot-removers, projecting the injury back onto the injurer. The implicit Lincoln comparison — the most grandiose self-identification in the analyzed corpus — simultaneously activates martyrdom and heroic redemption narratives, oscillating between vulnerable and grandiose narcissistic states. Both core factual claims are false to mostly false: the 1860 exclusion of Lincoln from Southern ballots reflected absent Republican infrastructure and party realignment across 163 years, not a coordinated removal; Lincoln was so extensively "mentioned" in slave states that his election triggered the secession crisis. Gateway Pundit citation performs in-group epistemic legitimation while insulating Trump from direct ownership of the distortion. The post constructs a moral equivalence between contemporary judicial constitutional process and pro-slavery electoral suppression — an implication that, absorbed by a radicalized audience, escalates the perceived moral stakes of the ballot ruling without using explicit violent language. Danger level is elevated. Authorship is likely collaborative: 6:55 PM EST timing and structural cleanliness suggest aide mediation of a Trump-sourced framing. The post is clinically significant as the highest-magnitude self-comparison yet identified and as an example of reality inversion functioning at the structural level of the argument rather than at the level of individual factual claims.

# Psychological Analysis: Trump Truth Social Post — December 20, 2023

## Situational Context

This post is a direct response to the Colorado Supreme Court's 4-3 ruling on December 19, 2023, that Trump is constitutionally disqualified from the primary ballot under the 14th Amendment Section 3. This represents one of the most significant legal setbacks of Trump's post-presidency — the first judicial removal of a presidential candidate from a state ballot in American history. The post arrives approximately 36 hours after the ruling.

## Trigger and Psychological State

The trigger is unambiguous: acute narcissistic injury from the Colorado ruling. Rather than responding with overt rage (notable given the magnitude of the injury), the post deploys a more controlled, historically framed response. The narcissistic state is **mixed** — simultaneously grandiose (implicit Lincoln comparison) and vulnerable (persecution narrative). This oscillation is characteristic of the malignant narcissism framework (Kernberg): when a grandiose defense is insufficient to absorb injury, the subject shifts to victimhood, casting persecution itself as proof of significance.

## Defense Mechanisms

**Projection** is the dominant defense: Trump, who is being removed from a ballot, accuses "Democrats" of being the historical ballot-removers. This inverts the actual power dynamic and converts the injurer into the injured, and vice versa. The maneuver is psychologically elegant — it cannot be easily rebutted without the opponent engaging the historical analogy, which itself shifts the conversation away from the constitutional substance of the ruling.

**Idealization** operates through the implicit Lincoln comparison. Trump does not say "I am like Lincoln" — the implicature does the work. By framing the 1860 situation as structural parallel to 2023, the audience is invited to complete the syllogism: Lincoln was a persecuted hero who prevailed; therefore Trump is too.

**Rationalization** converts a judicial constitutional ruling into a politically motivated partisan act, displacing the legal framework entirely. Within this framing, the judiciary disappears as an actor; only "Democrats" remain.

**Splitting** extends across 163 years: Democrats are monolithically tyrannical from slaveholder to present; Trump/Lincoln are the perennial persecuted innocents.

## Narrative Identity (McAdams Level 3)

The post constructs a **redemption sequence** prototype: Lincoln was persecuted and excluded, then prevailed and became the greatest president. The invitation is to position 2024 as the return of this arc. The **protagonist role** is the martyred hero — not the fighter or dealmaker personas Trump more typically inhabits. The **contrasting other** is "Democrats," cast as historically continuous agents of electoral suppression.

The **identity claim** embedded here is maximally grandiose without being stated: *I am Lincoln's successor in the line of persecuted American greatness.* This is among the most expansive self-mythologizing constructions in the corpus.

## Rhetorical Analysis

The rhetorical structure is compact and effective:

1. **Historical precedent frame**: Anchors the contemporary event in a morally loaded prior event
2. **Slavery-era invocation**: "Slave States" imports maximum moral weight without explicit statement
3. **Source citation**: Gateway Pundit provides in-group legitimacy and plausible deniability

The citation of Gateway Pundit is rhetorically significant. It performs two functions: (a) it signals in-group epistemology — Gateway Pundit is a trusted source within the MAGA information ecosystem — and (b) it positions Trump as reporting rather than claiming, insulating him from direct ownership of the historical distortion.

The phrase "so much as mentioned" constitutes **hyperbole** that collapses into falsity: Lincoln was so prominently mentioned in slave states that his election triggered the secession crisis. The rhetorical inversion is audacious — claiming invisibility for a figure whose visibility caused a civil war.

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "The last time the Democrats took someone off the ballot was in 1860" | **Mostly False** | Lincoln was indeed absent from ballots in most Southern slave states in 1860. However, framing this as Democrats 'taking someone off the ballot' is historically distorted: (1) The Republican Party had virtually no organizational infrastructure in the South, so Lincoln did not file for ballot access in most Southern states — this was not a removal but an absence; (2) Where Southern Democratic legislatures controlled ballot access law, exclusion was a structural feature, not a targeted removal analogous to a judicial disqualification; (3) The 1860 Democratic Party represents the antithesis of the modern Democratic Party's coalition — the parties underwent fundamental realignment across the following century. The comparison conflates geographically distinct 19th-century party structures with a contemporary judicial ruling. |
| "They would not allow a man named Abraham Lincoln to be so much as mentioned in 'Slave States'" | **False** | Lincoln was extensively 'mentioned' in slave states — his election in November 1860 with zero Southern electoral votes directly precipitated the secession crisis and the formation of the Confederacy. Southern newspapers, politicians, and legislatures debated Lincoln's election at length. He was absent from ballots, not from political discourse. The claim 'not so much as mentioned' is factually inverted; it was precisely the intense awareness of Lincoln that triggered Southern political action. |

Overall Veracity: 10%

## Gaslighting and Reality Distortion

The post executes **DARVO** (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) at a structural level: the entity that received the court order (Trump) becomes the victim of ballot suppression; the party that won in court (via constitutional process) becomes the tyrannical suppressor. This is reality reversal, not simplification.

The use of a historically distorted claim as the primary vehicle means followers who accept the framing are internalizing a false factual premise as the foundation of their political grievance. This constitutes **epistemic closure** — the in-group truth framework requires accepting a factually inverted account as evidence of persecution.

## Cognitive Status

This post shows no markers of word-finding difficulty, perseveration, or temporal confusion. The argument is coherent, if factually distorted. The structure is more organized than many authentic Trump posts, consistent with authorship attribution uncertainty (see below). Complexity is moderate and within established baseline range.

## Authorship Attribution

**Local time**: 6:55 PM EST (Trump likely at Mar-a-Lago, Florida, UTC-5). This falls within business hours, reducing authentic probability. However, the Gateway Pundit sourcing is a strong authentic marker — Trump has a documented pattern of consuming this outlet and directing posts accordingly. The absence of emotional punctuation, typos, or ALL CAPS on a high-trigger topic is atypical for fully authentic posts. **Assessment**: Most likely collaborative — Trump identified the Gateway Pundit framing and directed staff to post it, possibly with minor wording adjustments.

## Danger Assessment

**Elevated**. The post does not contain violent imagery or direct eliminationist language. However, the rhetorical framework — casting contemporary Democrats as the equivalent of pro-slavery forces who suppressed Lincoln — constructs a moral logic in which resistance to Trump's ballot access is historically equivalent to one of American history's greatest atrocities. This implication, absorbed by an audience already primed toward radicalization, elevates the moral stakes of any response to the ballot ruling. The framing implicitly validates extreme responses as proportionate to extreme historical injustice.

## Archetypal Dimensions

The post activates the **Martyr-Hero** archetype, with Lincoln as the mythological template. The shadow projection is onto "Democrats" as Tyrants — the archetypal oppressors of freedom. The **Victim** archetype is invoked but immediately elevated toward heroic martyrdom rather than remaining in passive victimhood, consistent with the mixed narcissistic state. The Jungian resonance of the Lincoln comparison is powerful within American political mythology: invoking Lincoln is invoking the nation's most sacred political memory, and claiming kinship with it claims access to that sacred status.

## Authorship Analysis

**Uncertain** (score: 55%)

### Indicators

- Gateway Pundit citation is strongly authentic Trump - he frequently amplifies this outlet directly
- Lincoln self-comparison is a recurring authentic Trump rhetorical motif
- 6:55 PM EST timing falls within business hours, slightly reducing authenticity probability
- Argument is unusually structured for late-period Trump, suggesting possible aide framing of a Trump-sourced idea
- Absence of typos, ALL CAPS, or emotional punctuation is atypical for authentic posts on high-trigger topics

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Mixed State**

**Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Defeat (Colorado Supreme Court 4-3 ruling removing Trump from the 2024 primary ballot under 14th Amendment Section 3)

Sentiment: -0.72

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 75%
- Antisocial: 30%
- Paranoid: 55%
- Sadism: 10%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- projection (immature)
- idealization (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)
- splitting (immature)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 48%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Inviting followers into a shared historical grievance narrative
- Positioning followers as standing alongside Lincoln against slaveholder-Democrats
- Epistemic dependency on Gateway Pundit as trusted in-group truth source

## Danger Assessment

**ELEVATED**

### Indicators

- Moral equivalence framing: contemporary judicial process cast as equivalent to pro-slavery electoral suppression, implying proportionate response is justified
- Radicalization scaffold: historical distortion accepted as fact by in-group audience elevates perceived moral stakes of ballot ruling
- Source laundering via Gateway Pundit normalizes factually inverted narrative within MAGA information ecosystem
- Lincoln martyrdom frame implicitly validates extreme sacrifice as appropriate response to extreme historical injustice

### Gaslighting

- DARVO at structural level: the entity receiving the court order (Trump) is repositioned as victim of ballot suppression; the winning party (judiciary/constitutional process) is repositioned as tyrannical suppressor
- Historical distortion deployed as factual premise: followers who accept the framing internalize a false account as the foundation of political grievance
- Erasure of the judiciary as actor: constitutional judicial process is replaced by partisan Democratic agency, making the ruling appear politically motivated rather than legally grounded
- 'Not so much as mentioned' claim inverts historical record — Lincoln's election caused secession precisely because of how intensely he was discussed in slave states

## Fact Checks (2)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-03-20._

> The last time the Democrats took someone off the ballot was in 1860

**MOSTLY FALSE**

Lincoln was indeed absent from ballots in most Southern slave states in 1860. However, framing this as Democrats 'taking someone off the ballot' is historically distorted: (1) The Republican Party had virtually no organizational infrastructure in the South, so Lincoln did not file for ballot access in most Southern states — this was not a removal but an absence; (2) Where Southern Democratic legislatures controlled ballot access law, exclusion was a structural feature, not a targeted removal analogous to a judicial disqualification; (3) The 1860 Democratic Party represents the antithesis of the modern Democratic Party's coalition — the parties underwent fundamental realignment across the following century. The comparison conflates geographically distinct 19th-century party structures with a contemporary judicial ruling.

Sources: Historical record of 1860 election ballot access by state; Party realignment scholarship (New Deal coalition, Southern Strategy)

> They would not allow a man named Abraham Lincoln to be so much as mentioned in 'Slave States'

**FALSE**

Lincoln was extensively 'mentioned' in slave states — his election in November 1860 with zero Southern electoral votes directly precipitated the secession crisis and the formation of the Confederacy. Southern newspapers, politicians, and legislatures debated Lincoln's election at length. He was absent from ballots, not from political discourse. The claim 'not so much as mentioned' is factually inverted; it was precisely the intense awareness of Lincoln that triggered Southern political action.

Sources: 1860 election historical record; Secession convention proceedings December 1860

Overall Veracity: 10%

## Tags

- ballot-disqualification-response (100%)
- lincoln-self-comparison (95%)
- darvo (90%)
- historical-distortion (90%)
- gateway-pundit-amplification (75%)
- martyrdom-narrative (85%)
- projection-ballot-removal (85%)
- epistemic-closure (80%)
- 14th-amendment (80%)
- slavery-era-invocation (75%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Colorado Ballot Ruling Triggers All-Day Narcissistic Crisis: Rage Cascades, Surrogate Validators, and a Lincoln Delusion**

Trump spent the day consumed by the Colorado Supreme Court's historic ruling removing him from the state's primary ballot — the first such decision in American history. His evening and early morning posts swung between raw emotional outbursts and curated media clips attacking the court, culminating in a demand that Biden drop all criminal and civil cases. By afternoon, aides shifted the feed toward favorable polling numbers to stabilize the narrative. The day closed with Trump comparing himself to Abraham Lincoln, falsely claiming Democrats similarly blocked Lincoln from the ballot in 1860 — a historically inaccurate parallel that captured the blend of grandiosity and grievance defining the entire day.

Full digest for 2023-12-20: https://trump.fm/date/2023-12-20/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2023, December 20). The last time the Democrats took someone off the... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_111615444771791371
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "The last time the Democrats took someone off the ballot was..." Truth Social, 20 Dec. 2023. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_111615444771791371. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "The last time the Democrats took someone off the ballot was...," Truth Social, December 20, 2023, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_111615444771791371.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_111615444771791371
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_111615444771791371
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_111615444771791371
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2023-12-20
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_111615444771791371.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._