# Post ts_111352707468669672 - Post ID: `ts_111352707468669672` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2023-11-04T14:17:54.804Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_111352707468669672 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_111352707468669672/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_111352707468669672.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > Thank you to @SeanHannity. This case should have never been brought. WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY! ## What the media says **Video transcript** (8:52), transcribed automatically, so names and numbers may be wrong. Speakers aren't identified, so a voice in it may not be his: > All right, so in the left's latest Trump witch hunt, Radical New York Attorney General Letitia James, who campaigned on going after one man, Donald Trump, one family, the Trump family, one organization, the Trump organization, is now claiming that the Trump organization, in fact, inflated the value of its assets in what is a big fraud scheme. Now, at the center of this trial is an insane ruling from a judge claiming that Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, that its real value is only $18 million. All right, let's do a quick one-on-one on Palm Beach real estate. Look at this here. We got a two-acre wooded lot on the ocean. There's no building on it at all. Five minutes away from Mar-a-Lago, listed for a whopping $150 million. You got another empty lot nearby. 2.3 acres on the ocean, listed for $200 million. Look at your screen. Mar-a-Lago is a 60,000 square foot, 58 bedroom, 33 bathroom, mansion, historical location, as such, with two clubs located on 20 acres of prime Palm Beach real estate with a unique position in that it has property on the inter-coastal side and on the ocean from side with a club associated with it. 20 acres, okay. Now, this is what the judge wants you to believe is worth, let's see, over $100 million less than a wooded lot of two acres, you gotta be kidding me. Now, remember, every contract that the Trump family was involved in with real estate and applying for loans and dealing with insurance companies, lending companies, okay, they would tell, they had language in this contract that said not to use their appraisals, but they had to use their own appraisals, that it would be their fiduciary responsibility to come up with what they believe the real value of a property happens to be. And by the way, not one bank, not one insurance company ever filed any complaint. Everyone was paid on time. Now, if this isn't hypocritical left-wing politics that is worse, I don't know what is. Here with reaction, Trump legal spokesperson, Alina Hoppe is with us, the author of the Constitution of the US and other patriotic documents, Fox News legal analyst, Greg Jarrett. Now, Alina, I don't wanna put you in a position, I understand a gag order is in place, but I do wanna talk about real estate down in Palm Beach. I know a thing or two about it. And I've talked to a lot of realtors, they're laughing at this. So the allegation is that the Trump organization was artificially inflating numbers to get more favorable loan terms and more favorable insurance rates, okay. The judge is claiming that a property, according to realtors I spoke to, is kind of close to a billion dollars and he's sticking with 18 million. Now, doesn't that make him guilty of the very thing that they're trying to claim that the Trump family did? - It does and I think that we should look at anybody that's taken a property and their tax assessed value, which is by the way, what he thinks the property is now worth. The $18 million is a tax assessed value. So if you actually were going to sell it and I know you're familiar with the property, so am I, you probably could maybe sell half of a tennis court here for $18 million given where it's located and what it's worth. The statement of financial condition for the president, for the company was undervalued tremendously. If the president had put his brand alone, the brand of Trump, which got him elected to office, that brand alone would quadruple, triple, double, whatever the number is, the statement of financial condition. This is insanity and the fact, frankly, that I can't speak freely is insanity in and of itself. So we're really in a banana republic. This is political law fair, not warfare, and I'm sitting front row for it, it's unfortunate. - So Greg Jarrett, just common sense and logic needs to prevail here. So you got 20 plus acres on the inner coastal and on the ocean side. You got a club, you got this massive building, it's historical, many, many bedrooms and bathrooms and everything in between, and it's a club on top of it. And meanwhile, a two acre parcel of ocean from property in Palm Beach is gonna go for 200 million, but that 20 plus acre property is only worth 18 million and the judge is sticking by that valuation with a straight face, you gotta be kidding me. I mean, this can't be, this really can't be happening in this country, but it is happening. What do you make of it all? - Well, it shows how biased the judge is, determined to find that Trump's liable at trial, but the good news for them is, Sean, I doubt that any of this will ever stand up on appeal because this executive law being used against them completely undermines more than a century of established common law that requires proof of intent to deceive in civil fraud cases that somebody knowingly made false statements. But this poorly conceived law simply does away with all of that and punishes somebody for making inaccurate statements with no intent to do so, sort of like prosecuting a customer for robbing a bank because the teller gave out the wrong change. This law also violates the Constitution, Sean, it penalizes inaccurate commercial speech, which the First Amendment protects. But you know, under Letitia James, anybody can have their business taken away from them by her if they happen to misstate without negligence or intent assets that are used to secure loans, even if the business owner relied entirely on professionals to do the valuations, which the Trump organization did. - I'm not sure whether Alina can answer or not, and I don't wanna put her in a bad spot here, but you do have an AG that ran on a platform to go after one man, Donald Trump, one family, the Trump family, one organization, the Trump organization. Alina, to the extent you can, you can weigh in, Greg, you can weigh in, you know, to me, there's something so fundamentally wrong about that, running on a campaign and now fulfilling a campaign promise, Alina? - That's 100% wrong. It's political interference, it's political persecution, prosecution, and it is something we've been fighting, and I'm happy to speak freely about it. Ms. James has gone outside and showed up, Sean, only on the days where it was headline days, only on the days where the president is there, where the kids were there. She wasn't there for the past few days. She thought they were mundane, evidently. But the other day, she's sitting there while the city is going to hell. And we are watching something where the statement of financial condition was frankly undervalued, where there was, you know, a disclaimer on the front page with sophisticated lenders saying, you need to do your own due diligence, but nobody is paying attention to the glaring fact that you just brought up. Ms. James is doing this for political reasons. She does not care about New York. She does not care about businesses doing well. She is doing it so that she can make money, so that she can run. And you know what, frankly, it's backfiring in her face if you look at the polls. - You know, and you gotta think about, this is the state, Greg, and we only have about 20 seconds left, that has no bail loss. Not one insurance company that I've heard of or read about, not one lending institution. None of them complained. Why is this even in court? - When she ran for office on the campaign promise of "getting Trump," she was violating the ethical standard that governs prosecutors, she had no access to any evidence, any investigative files, she committed herself publicly to getting a specific individual, and then she misused the power of her office to manufacture a case against him. That's the sort of thing for which she should be disbarred. - We're now criminalizing political differences. That's a very dangerous place for any country to be. ## Media - video: https://static-assets-1.truthsocial.com/tmtg:prime-ts-assets/media_attachments/files/111/352/707/043/853/457/original/2e3baa1ae43376be.mp4 ## Engagement - Likes: 19,127 - Reposts: 5,588 - Replies: 1,565 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.392Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-20T10:33:32.503Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary This post represents a textbook narcissistic injury response to acute legal exposure. As Trump's sons complete damaging testimony and his own November 6 appearance looms, the post executes a characteristic three-move sequence: ally validation → legitimacy denial → civilizational reframe. The escalation to "WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!" converts defendant status into patriot status, conscripting the American public as co-defendants in a freedom struggle. Clinically notable is the expansion of the persecution frame from prior "witch hunt" language to explicit communist-state attribution — a widening of paranoid framing consistent with escalating legal pressure. Defense mechanisms are pathological-tier: wholesale denial of the proceeding's legitimacy and gross distortion of civil fraud accountability into communist oppression. The post likely reflects gag-order awareness — maximum emotional intensity is achieved through ideological declaration rather than named individual attacks, suggesting some behavioral constraint is operating. The collective "WE" is psychologically significant: Trump ceases to be a defendant and becomes a symbol, making his legal defense synonymous with American identity. Danger level is elevated due to systematic institutional delegitimization eroding judicial trust, though no acute stochastic terrorism indicators are present. Longitudinal pattern across the November 2023 legal period warrants monitoring of the escalating delegitimization rhetoric as it progresses from "witch hunt" to systemic communist persecution framing. # Psychological Analysis: Trump Truth Social Post — November 4, 2023 ## Post > "Thank you to @SeanHannity. This case should have never been brought. WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!" --- ## Authorship Attribution **Likely authentic Trump** (confidence: medium; score: 0.78/1.0) Posted at **9:17 AM EST** — within Trump's known early-morning posting window during legally active periods. Stylistic fingerprints strongly favor authentic authorship: the ALL CAPS rhetorical escalation, the grammatical inversion ("should have never been brought" rather than the standard "should never have been brought"), the reactive brevity, and the ally-acknowledgment opening all recur consistently in documented authentic Trump posts. The attached MP4 is consistent with Trump watching Hannity's coverage live and reposting in real time. Timing ambiguity prevents high-confidence rating. --- ## Contextual Frame This post arrives at a moment of acute legal exposure. The NY Civil Fraud Trial had already produced a September 2023 liability finding (pre-trial ruling by Judge Engoron). Donald Trump Jr. testified November 1-2 and Eric Trump November 2-3, both underperforming (Eric acknowledging awareness of financial statements dating to 2013 when confronted with emails). Trump himself is scheduled to testify November 6 — an extraordinary exposure. The federal gag order had just been reinstated October 29. This is a period of maximum narcissistic injury across multiple simultaneous legal fronts. --- ## Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five) | Trait | Salience | Evidence | |-------|----------|----------| | **Neuroticism** | Very High | Angry hostility, emotional escalation to ideological declaration | | **Extraversion** | High | Assertive, audience-seeking, validation-oriented (Hannity thank-you) | | **Agreeableness** | Very Low | Combative dismissal of legal process, no acknowledgment of others' perspectives | | **Conscientiousness** | Low | Impulsive, undeliberated response | | **Openness** | Low | Rigid ideological framing, no epistemic flexibility | --- ## Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations — Motives **Dominant motive: Power/Agency** The post is a reassertion of control narrative in a context where legal proceedings represent a profound loss of control. Thanking Hannity, declaring the case illegitimate, and invoking communist oppression all serve to restore a sense of agency and status in a moment of institutional subordination. **Communion motive: Low / Instrumental** The Hannity acknowledgment is communion-adjacent but is instrumentally motivated — it is audience-maintenance and ally-reward, not genuine interpersonal warmth. --- ## Level 3: Narrative Identity **Protagonist role:** Persecuted patriot / Freedom fighter **Contamination sequence:** Legitimate American leader → victim of communist-style persecution **Contrasting other:** The communist state apparatus (implicitly: NY AG Letitia James, Judge Engoron, the Democratic establishment) **Identity claims:** "I am being persecuted not as a fraudster but as an American; this case is un-American" The three-beat structure of the post maps precisely onto a narrative arc: (1) ally validation → (2) innocence assertion → (3) civilizational stakes declaration. The "WE" in the final sentence is a deliberate narrative expansion — Trump ceases to be a defendant and becomes a symbol for American identity. --- ## Level 4: Clinical Indicators ### Malignant Narcissism Assessment **A. Narcissistic Features (High: 0.82)** The instant conversion of legal accountability into evidence of persecution reflects grandiosity (I cannot be legitimately prosecuted) and entitlement (this case should never have been brought — because I am above it). The need for public ally validation (Hannity) reflects the ongoing demand for narcissistic supply even during legal crisis. **B. Antisocial Features (Moderate: 0.61)** Contempt for legal process is expressed without apology or qualification. The framing positions rule-of-law as the enemy. **C. Paranoid Features (High: 0.78)** Persecution frame has escalated from prior "witch hunt" / "election interference" language to a systemic ideological threat ("communist country"). This represents a widening of the paranoid frame, consistent with escalating legal pressure. **D. Ego-Syntonic Sadism (Low: 0.12)** Not salient in this post; the affect is persecutory rather than sadistic. --- ### Defense Mechanisms 1. **Denial (Pathological):** "This case should have never been brought" — a wholesale refusal to accept the legitimacy of a proceeding that had already produced a liability finding. This is not disputing a specific claim but negating the entire proceeding's existence as legitimate reality. 2. **Distortion (Pathological):** The reframing of a civil fraud trial — brought by a state attorney general following documented evidence of financial statement manipulation — as "communist" state persecution represents a gross reshaping of reality. The claim has no evidentiary relationship to actual communist political systems. 3. **Projection (Immature):** The authoritarian power being attributed to the legal system is a projection. The proceeding is being conducted through established democratic legal mechanisms; the projection reverses the valence. --- ### Narcissistic Dynamics **Trigger:** Narcissistic injury via exposure (sons' damaging testimony; his own imminent testimony; pre-existing liability finding) **Rage:** Present (intensity: 0.72). Notably, the rage is converted into ideological declaration rather than direct attack on a named individual — possibly reflecting the reinstated gag order, which constrains direct attacks on witnesses and court personnel. The "communist country" frame allows maximal emotional intensity without naming a gag-order-covered target. **Proportionality:** Very low (0.15). The response is disproportionate to the precipitating legal event, indicating the response is driven by internal narcissistic dynamics. **State:** Mixed — oscillating between vulnerable (persecuted) and grandiose (freedom fighter). The post begins in the vulnerable register ("this case should never have been brought") and climaxes in a grandiose reframe ("WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!"). --- ## Rhetorical Analysis **Key techniques:** - **ALL CAPS activation:** Emotional amplification; audience attention capture; signals authenticity and spontaneity - **Collective "WE":** Conscripts American public into his legal defense; makes support for Trump synonymous with American identity - **False equivalence:** Civil fraud accountability = communist tyranny; collapses complex legal reality into binary ideological frame - **Cold War fear activation:** "Communist" triggers deeply encoded Cold War anxieties in target demographic - **Institutional delegitimization:** Positioned as patriotism; systematically erodes judicial trust **Notable restraint:** No named individual targets in the attack on the case. This may reflect gag order compliance — the "communist country" frame achieves maximum emotional effect while avoiding specific individual targeting. --- ## Reality Distortions 1. **The case "should never have been brought":** NY AG Letitia James's office conducted a multi-year investigation producing substantial documentary evidence; Judge Engoron found liability in September 2023 prior to the trial. The case was brought through established legal mechanisms with documented evidentiary basis. 2. **"Communist country" framing:** The United States legal system, whatever its imperfections, bears no structural resemblance to communist political systems. The characterization has no evidentiary basis and represents a significant reality distortion. --- ## Gaslighting & Epistemic Closure **Gaslighting present:** Yes The "communist country" frame attacks followers' capacity to perceive the legal proceedings as legitimate. It demands acceptance of a false equivalence as a condition of in-group identity. This is a form of epistemic gaslighting — not "this event didn't happen" but "your framework for understanding what this event means is wrong." **Epistemic closure:** Yes — the frame is binary. Either you see this as communist persecution (in-group) or you accept the legal system's legitimacy (out-group/enemy). --- ## Cognitive Status **Complexity score:** 0.31 (low, but consistent with Trump's authentic posting style — not a deviation) **Baseline deviation:** None — this post is stylistically consistent with established patterns **No cognitive markers of concern** are identifiable in this brief post. The brevity, grammatical inversion, and ALL CAPS are all baseline features, not deviations. --- ## Archetypal Analysis (Jungian) **Primary archetypes:** - **Warrior/Victim:** The persecuted fighter who suffers unjust assault but frames it as battle - **Hero/Savior:** By extension, the one who fights communist forces on behalf of "WE" (the American people) **Shadow projection:** The authoritarian, law-defying, persecution-oriented behavior is projected onto "communist" legal actors. What is disowned about self (use of power to circumvent accountability, contempt for rule of law) is attributed to the persecutors. **Order/Chaos positioning:** Order Attacker (attacking corrupt/illegitimate order) + Order Restorer (promising to return to proper American values). The legal system is cast as illegitimate order; Trump positions himself as the restorer of authentic American order. --- ## Danger Assessment **Level: Elevated** This post does not contain direct stochastic terrorism indicators (no target + grievance + implied action against an individual). However, the institutional delegitimization pattern — characterizing the entire US legal system as "communist" — represents an ongoing contribution to a cumulative threat environment: - Systematic erosion of judicial legitimacy increases the probability of follower violence against court personnel - "Communist" framing historicizes enemies in eliminationist terms (communists were to be defeated, not accommodated) - Pattern across consecutive posts (ELECTION INTERFERENCE!!! → communist country) shows escalating intensity of delegitimization rhetoric during legal exposure **No single post crosses the critical threshold; the longitudinal pattern is the concern.** --- ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "This case should have never been brought" | **Mostly False** | NY AG Letitia James's office conducted a multi-year investigation producing substantial documentary evidence of financial statement manipulation. Judge Engoron issued a pre-trial liability finding in September 2023. The case was brought through established legal mechanisms with documented evidentiary basis. 'Should never have been brought' is an opinion claim with no evidentiary support presented. | | "WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY (implied: this prosecution resembles communist state persecution)" | **False** | While the US is factually not a communist country, the implied equivalence — that this civil fraud prosecution resembles communist state persecution — has no evidentiary basis. The proceeding was conducted through elected AG, independent judiciary, established civil law mechanisms, and adversarial process with full legal representation. No structural parallels to communist political persecution exist. | Overall Veracity: 10% ## Summary **(Clinically significant — summary generated)** This post represents a textbook narcissistic injury response to acute legal exposure. Posted as Trump's sons complete damaging testimony and his own November 6 appearance looms, the post executes a characteristic three-move sequence: ally validation → legitimacy denial → civilizational reframe. The rhetorical escalation to "WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!" converts defendant status into patriot status, enrolling the American public as co-defendants in a freedom struggle. Clinically notable is the expansion of the persecution frame from prior "witch hunt" / "election interference" language to explicit communist-state attribution — a widening of paranoid framing consistent with escalating legal pressure. Defense mechanisms are pathological-tier: wholesale denial of the proceeding's legitimacy and gross distortion of a civil fraud accountability process into communist oppression. The post likely reflects gag-order awareness: maximum emotional intensity is achieved through ideological declaration rather than named individual attacks, suggesting some behavioral constraint is operating. The collective "WE" is psychologically significant — Trump ceases to be a defendant and becomes a symbol, making his legal defense synonymous with American identity. Danger level is elevated due to systematic institutional delegitimization contributing to cumulative erosion of judicial trust. No acute stochastic terrorism indicators are present in this post. Longitudinal pattern across the November 2023 legal period warrants continued monitoring of the escalating delegitimization rhetoric. ## Authorship Analysis **Self-Written** (score: 78%) ### Indicators - ALL CAPS emotional outburst ('WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!') is a hallmark Trump authenticity marker - Minor grammatical inversion ('should have never been brought' vs. standard 'should never have been brought') - Brief, reactive, punchy structure consistent with Trump's authentic posting style - Posted at 9:17 AM EST — morning business hours, slightly ambiguous but Trump is known to post early mornings - Thank-you-to-ally framing ('Thank you to @SeanHannity') is a recurrent Trump validation-seeking pattern ## Psychological Profile ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (NY Civil Fraud Trial — sons' testimony just concluded (Nov 1-3), Trump himself scheduled to testify Nov 6; massive legal and reputational exposure) **Rage:** Intensity 72% targeting NY Civil Fraud Trial / NY AG Letitia James / judicial system - Proportionality: 15% Sentiment: -0.62 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 82% - Antisocial: 61% - Paranoid: 78% - Sadism: 12% **Defense Mechanisms:** - denial (pathological) - distortion (pathological) - projection (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 31% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Public gratitude to media ally (Hannity) reinforces parasocial bond with Fox News audience - ALL CAPS declarative ('WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!') interpellates the audience as co-participants in ideological identity ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - Communist framing historicizes legal adversaries in eliminationist terms — communists are enemies to be defeated, not accommodated - Systematic characterization of US judicial system as ideologically illegitimate increases ambient threat environment for court personnel - Longitudinal escalation of delegitimization rhetoric (ELECTION INTERFERENCE → communist country) during period of legal exposure - No direct stochastic terrorism trigger (target + grievance + implied action) in this post; pattern-level risk is the concern ### Gaslighting - 'This case should have never been brought' — denies legitimacy of proceeding that produced a liability finding; attacks followers' capacity to perceive the legal system as legitimate - 'Communist country' frame is epistemic gaslighting: demands followers adopt a false equivalence framework as condition of in-group identity - Framing redefines legal accountability as authoritarian persecution, inverting the actual power dynamic ## Fact Checks (2) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-20._ > This case should have never been brought **MOSTLY FALSE** NY AG Letitia James's office conducted a multi-year investigation producing substantial documentary evidence of financial statement manipulation. Judge Engoron issued a pre-trial liability finding in September 2023. The case was brought through established legal mechanisms with documented evidentiary basis. 'Should never have been brought' is an opinion claim with no evidentiary support presented. Sources: NY Civil Fraud Trial records; Judge Engoron September 2023 liability ruling > WE ARE NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY (implied: this prosecution resembles communist state persecution) **FALSE** While the US is factually not a communist country, the implied equivalence — that this civil fraud prosecution resembles communist state persecution — has no evidentiary basis. The proceeding was conducted through elected AG, independent judiciary, established civil law mechanisms, and adversarial process with full legal representation. No structural parallels to communist political persecution exist. Sources: US constitutional law; NY AG office procedures; Civil fraud trial procedural record Overall Veracity: 10% ## Tags - narcissistic-injury (90%) - legal-persecution-frame (88%) - institutional-delegitimization (85%) - communist-reframe (82%) - ny-fraud-trial (90%) - paranoid-escalation (78%) - hannity-validation (65%) - gag-order-adjacent (60%) - pathological-denial (82%) - all-caps-activation (75%) - authentic-trump (78%) - epistemic-closure (80%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Legal Anxiety Fuels 14-Minute Rally Escalation as Trump Targets Humanitarian Aid Organizations** Trump spent November 4 building toward and performing at the Florida Freedom Summit in Orlando, with the looming New York civil fraud trial clearly shaping his mood. The morning started with a sharp outburst calling the U.S. a "communist country" over his legal proceedings, before shifting to routine campaign promotion. The rally itself produced a rapid-fire burst of increasingly aggressive posts over just 14 minutes, moving from bland praise of Florida to threatening criminal prosecution of charitable organizations helping migrants at the border. Immigration fear-mongering and attacks on Biden dominated the evening, functioning as obvious outlets for anxiety about his upcoming personal court testimony two days later. Full digest for 2023-11-04: https://trump.fm/date/2023-11-04/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2023, November 4). Thank you to @SeanHannity. This case should have... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_111352707468669672 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "Thank you to @SeanHannity. This case should have never been..." Truth Social, 4 Nov. 2023. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_111352707468669672. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "Thank you to @SeanHannity. This case should have never been...," Truth Social, November 4, 2023, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_111352707468669672. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_111352707468669672 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_111352707468669672 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_111352707468669672 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2023-11-04 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_111352707468669672.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._