# Post ts_110403685560850861 - Post ID: `ts_110403685560850861` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2023-05-20T23:49:09.698Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_110403685560850861 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_110403685560850861/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_110403685560850861.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/TomFitton/statuses/110391274423567214 Can you believe? They Rigged the Election, and want to prosecute me! ## Engagement - Likes: 9,990 - Reposts: 3,020 - Replies: 318 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.411Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-20T04:47:36.943Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary A compact, high-efficiency delivery of Trump's core persecution narrative, activated by the approaching classified documents indictment. The psychological architecture is characteristic: narcissistic injury (prosecution threat) triggers the election-rigging frame as pathological distortion, inverting his legal jeopardy into proof of ongoing persecution. The Durham Report's simultaneous release creates a vindication-plus-persecution emotional doubling — FBI wrongdoing confirmed, yet prosecution continues — intensifying the moral inversion. The post deploys DARVO compression, parasocial intimacy ('Can you believe?'), and capitalization-as-ontology to transmit the persecution narrative efficiently. The retruth of Tom Fitton functions as external validation supply from a loyalist authority. Authorship is high-confidence authentic Trump: evening post in EDT, signature rhetorical tics, emotional reactivity, no aide-written formalism. Cognitive status shows no deviation from established baseline of affectively-driven, syntactically simple posting. The 'Rigged the Election' claim is empirically false; the prosecution threat was accurate and imminent (indictment followed June 9). Danger assessment is elevated due to systematic delegitimization of legal process, but below stochastic terrorism threshold — no specific targets identified, no action implied. ## Post Analysis: ts_110403685560850861 — May 20, 2023 ### Overview A brief retruth of Tom Fitton (Judicial Watch) combined with Trump's own six-word rhetorical addendum: *"Can you believe? They Rigged the Election, and want to prosecute me!"* The post is minimalist but psychologically dense — compressing the subject's core persecution narrative into a single exclamatory burst. The malformed URL (the RT link bleeds directly into Trump's text with no line break) suggests platform-level formatting behavior, not cognitive confusion on the author's part. --- ### 1. Authorship Attribution **UTC:** 2023-05-20T23:49:09Z **Local time (EDT, New York / Mar-a-Lago):** 7:49 PM ET Trump was almost certainly in the continental US — not attending the G7 in Hiroshima, as he is not currently president. At 7:49 PM local time, this falls in the early-evening posting window — not the classic late-night signature, but well within Trump's documented personal posting range (evening posts are frequent and authentic). **Authenticity indicators:** - "Can you believe?" is a signature Trump rhetorical tic — abrupt, conversational, seeking shared outrage - Capitalized proper noun usage ("Rigged the Election") consistent with documented Trump idiolect - Emotional reactivity and punchy exclamation point - Stream-of-consciousness brevity - No event announcement, scheduling, or formal structure — not aide-written boilerplate - The retruth amplifies a Trump loyalist (Fitton) before appending the personal comment — classic supply-seeking and validation-loop behavior **Assessment:** High confidence this is authentic Trump composition, likely personal device. --- ### 2. Psychological State & Triggers **Primary trigger:** *Narcissistic injury — threat of prosecution.* The known events context is crucial here: Jack Smith's classified documents investigation was intensifying, with new evidence suggesting Trump and advisers understood proper declassification procedures. Tim Parlatore's resignation just three days earlier (May 17) — publicly attributed to obstructions by Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn — would have signaled legal vulnerability. The approaching prosecution is a maximal narcissistic injury: not criticism or unfavorable comparison, but the state apparatus formally treating the subject as a criminal. **Countervailing supply:** The Durham Report, released during this period, validated Trump's years-long narrative about the FBI's illegitimate Russia probe. This produced a psychological doubling effect: simultaneous grandiose vindication ("see, I was right about the FBI") and vulnerable persecution ("and now they're still coming after me"). The post is best understood as a synthesis of both — the indignation of the wrongly persecuted man who has just been proven right. **Narcissistic state:** Mixed — predominantly *vulnerable* (victimized, persecuted by prosecution) with grandiose substrate (the election *had* to be rigged because I am otherwise unbeatable). The vulnerability and grandiosity are logically co-dependent in this post: the greatness is the premise; the rigging is required to explain the outcome; the prosecution is the continuation of the injustice. --- ### 3. Defense Mechanisms **Denial (Level 1 — Pathological):** The phrase "They Rigged the Election" states as settled fact a claim rejected by over 60 courts, the DOJ, Trump's own AG, and independent election authorities. This is not rationalization — it is denial of external reality. **Distortion (Level 1 — Pathological):** The prosecutorial threat is reframed not as a response to Trump's conduct but as a continuation of the same conspiratorial campaign that (in his frame) stole the election. Reality is grossly reshaped to preserve internal coherence. **Projection (Level 2 — Immature):** "They Rigged the Election" attributes corrupt behavior (election manipulation) to opponents, displacing focus from the classified documents conduct under investigation. **DARVO Pattern (Deny / Attack / Reverse Victim and Offender):** Post-compressed DARVO sequence — *Deny* (the election was stolen, not lost), *Attack* (accusatory framing of prosecutors), *Reverse* (I am the real victim of criminal behavior). --- ### 4. Narrative Identity (McAdams Level 3) **Protagonist role:** Martyr-warrior — a figure so powerful that his enemies had to cheat to defeat him, and are now attempting to silence him through legal persecution. **Narrative sequence:** *Contamination* — the implicit arc is: winning (or rightfully owning the election) → betrayal/rigging → ongoing persecution. The storyline is unresolved, extending the contamination sequence into the present. **Identity claims:** - "I am someone who cannot be defeated fairly" - "I am targeted precisely because I am a threat to entrenched power" - "My prosecution is political, not legal" **Contrasting other:** Unnamed conspiratorial "They" — a depersonalized, omnipotent adversary. The lack of specific naming (not "the Democrats" or "Joe Biden") allows the "They" to function as an expandable shadow category absorbing any and all opposition. **Archetypal framing:** Simultaneously *Victim* (wrongly prosecuted) and *Hero* (persecuted because of significance). The Warrior archetype is activated by the retruth of Fitton — drawing on an external validator to reinforce the combat narrative. --- ### 5. Rhetorical Techniques **"Can you believe?"** — Parasocial intimacy device. Invites the audience into shared incredulity, positioning them as co-sufferers who understand the outrage. Flattens the distance between speaker and follower. **Juxtaposition:** "Rigged the Election" + "want to prosecute me" — the two clauses create an implicit logical argument: *they* committed the crime; *I* am being prosecuted. The moral inversion is compressed into a single sentence. **Capitalization as emphasis:** "Rigged the Election" — grammatically capitalizing a common phrase treats it as a proper noun/historical event, reinforcing its reality-status. **Appeal to outrage and injustice:** The entire post is structured around moral inversion — corrupt actors prosecuting the righteous victim. **Whataboutism implied:** The retruth of Fitton (a Judicial Watch election/FBI-focused commentator) contextualizes the prosecution within a broader framing of government corruption, implying equivalence between Trump's legal jeopardy and alleged Democratic misconduct. No dehumanizing language. No violent imagery. Stochastic terrorism pattern absent. --- ### 6. Reality Distortion & Gaslighting **Primary distortion:** "They Rigged the Election" is an empirically false factual claim stated with absolute certainty. Over 60 legal challenges to the 2020 election were dismissed; the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency called it "the most secure election in American history"; Trump's own DOJ found no evidence of fraud sufficient to change the outcome. **Epistemic closure function:** Posting this after the Durham Report creates a closed epistemic loop — Durham validates FBI misconduct → FBI misconduct validates the rigging claim → the rigging claim delegitimizes the prosecution → prosecution proves the persecution narrative. Followers who accept premise one are carried through the chain. **Gaslighting vector:** Not directed at a specific individual target in this post, but functions at societal scale — asserting a false consensus reality that followers must accept to remain in the in-group. --- ### 7. Cognitive Status **Language production:** No word-finding difficulties, tangentiality, or paraphasia evident. The text is extremely brief, which limits assessment. **Complexity:** Low syntactic complexity — two independent clauses, one rhetorical question. Consistent with Trump's documented baseline short-burst Truth Social style. No deviation from established pattern. **Perseveration:** "Rigged the Election" is an extensively perseverative phrase in Trump's corpus — documented across hundreds of posts since November 2020. This instance is a standard occurrence, not a noteworthy escalation. **Temporal coherence:** The post correctly associates current prosecution threats with the election narrative — no temporal confusion or anachronism evident. **Assessment:** No markers of acute cognitive deviation from baseline. Baseline itself reflects a simplified, affectively-driven communication style that predates current period. --- ### 8. Fact Verification **Claim 1:** "They Rigged the Election" **Verdict:** FALSE Evidence: 60+ court cases dismissed for lack of evidence; DOJ, FBI, CISA, and Trump's own Attorney General found no fraud sufficient to affect the outcome; multiple state recounts confirmed results. **Claim 2:** "[They] want to prosecute me" **Verdict:** MOSTLY TRUE Evidence: Jack Smith's classified documents investigation was actively intensifying as of this date, with Parlatore's resignation days prior and new evidence being gathered. Indictment followed on June 9, 2023. The framing ("want to") implies political motivation rather than legal basis, which is contested — but the prosecution was real and imminent. --- ### 9. Danger Assessment **Level:** ELEVATED (not high or critical) No eliminationist language, no specific target identification, no violent imagery. However, the framing of legitimate prosecution as illegitimate persecution — combined with the implication that "they" are a criminal conspiracy — maintains a background level of rhetorical danger. The grievance is explicitly articulated; the injustice is named; but no action is implied or directed. Longitudinally, this type of post functions as grievance accumulation infrastructure — building the shared outrage that becomes mobilizable under different conditions. --- ### Summary This post represents a compact, high-efficiency delivery of Trump's core persecution narrative, activated by the approaching classified documents indictment. The psychological architecture is characteristic: narcissistic injury (prosecution threat) triggers the election-rigging frame as a defensive distortion, inverting the moral valence of his legal jeopardy into proof of ongoing persecution. The Durham Report's simultaneous release creates a vindication-plus-persecution emotional doubling — he was right about FBI misconduct, and yet they are still coming for him. The post deploys DARVO compression, parasocial intimacy ("Can you believe?"), and capitalization-as-ontology to efficiently transmit the persecution narrative. Authorship is high-confidence authentic Trump: evening post, characteristic rhetorical tics, emotional reactivity, no aide-written formalism. The retruth of Tom Fitton functions as external validation supply. Cognitive status shows no deviation from established baseline. The core "Rigged the Election" claim remains empirically false; the prosecution claim was accurate and imminent. Danger assessment is elevated due to the delegitimization of legal process framing but below threshold for stochastic terrorism indicators. ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "They Rigged the Election" | **False** | Over 60 post-election legal challenges were dismissed for lack of evidence. The DOJ, FBI, CISA, and Trump's own Attorney General William Barr found no fraud sufficient to affect the outcome. Multiple state recounts and audits confirmed results. The claim has no credible evidentiary basis. | | "[They] want to prosecute me" | **Mostly True** | Jack Smith's classified documents investigation was actively intensifying as of May 20, 2023, with Parlatore's resignation days prior and new evidence being gathered. Trump was indicted on classified documents charges June 9, 2023. The 'want to' framing implies political motivation rather than legal basis — that dimension is contested — but the prosecution was real and imminent. | Overall Veracity: 40% ## Authorship Analysis **Self-Written** (score: 88%) ### Indicators - 'Can you believe?' is a documented Trump rhetorical signature - Capitalized 'Rigged the Election' consistent with Trump idiolect - 7:49 PM ET — early-evening, within authentic posting window - Punchy exclamatory single sentence — stream-of-consciousness quality - Retruth of loyalist (Fitton) with personal emotional addendum — typical Trump format ## Psychological Profile ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Jack Smith classified documents investigation intensifying; Parlatore resignation signaling legal vulnerability) Sentiment: -0.65 ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 75% - Antisocial: 40% - Paranoid: 70% - Sadism: 10% **Defense Mechanisms:** - denial (pathological) - distortion (pathological) - projection (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 25% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Rhetorical question ('Can you believe?') inviting shared incredulity - Positioning audience as co-sufferers who understand the outrage - Amplifying loyalist (Fitton) to create validation loop ## Danger Assessment **ELEVATED** ### Indicators - Delegitimization of legal process as criminal persecution — erodes institutional trust - Grievance explicitly articulated (prosecution as injustice) without action direction - Ongoing accumulation of persecution narrative infrastructure — historically mobilizable under different post triggers - Framing of 'They' as omnipotent criminal conspiracy without naming — diffuse threat attribution ### Gaslighting - 'They Rigged the Election' stated as incontrovertible fact contradicting documented reality - Prosecution reframed as illegitimate persecution, attacking audience's ability to assess legal process neutrally - Epistemic closure demand: accepting rigging narrative required to view prosecution as unjust ## Fact Checks (2) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-20._ > They Rigged the Election **FALSE** Over 60 post-election legal challenges were dismissed for lack of evidence. The DOJ, FBI, CISA, and Trump's own Attorney General William Barr found no fraud sufficient to affect the outcome. Multiple state recounts and audits confirmed results. The claim has no credible evidentiary basis. Sources: 60+ court dismissals 2020-2021; AG Barr December 2020 DOJ statement; CISA 'most secure election' statement; Multiple state audits including Arizona Cyber Ninjas audit > [They] want to prosecute me **MOSTLY TRUE** Jack Smith's classified documents investigation was actively intensifying as of May 20, 2023, with Parlatore's resignation days prior and new evidence being gathered. Trump was indicted on classified documents charges June 9, 2023. The 'want to' framing implies political motivation rather than legal basis — that dimension is contested — but the prosecution was real and imminent. Sources: Jack Smith classified documents investigation timeline; Trump indictment June 9, 2023; Parlatore resignation May 17, 2023 Overall Veracity: 40% ## Tags - election-fraud-claim (95%) - persecution-narrative (90%) - DARVO (85%) - legal-jeopardy-response (85%) - pathological-denial (80%) - epistemic-closure (75%) - authentic-trump (88%) - narcissistic-injury (85%) - retruth-with-addendum (60%) - Tom-Fitton-amplification (50%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **Durham Vindication Poisoned by Prosecution Anxiety as Trump Cycles Between Triumph and Siege** Trump spent the day toggling between claiming vindication from the Durham Report and expressing intense anxiety about the Jack Smith documents investigation closing in. A late-night burst included alarming FBI-as-oppressor rhetoric and a lengthy attack on Jack Smith that extended suspicion to the prosecutor's family. A rapid-fire morning dump of links celebrated polling leads and Durham coverage, but was laced with calls for retribution and the prosecution of DA Alvin Bragg. The afternoon brought a pointed personal attack on former aide Alyssa Farah Griffin, complete with factual distortions and a threatening "more to follow" sign-off. What should have been a clean victory lap on Durham was repeatedly contaminated by persecution narratives tied to the approaching indictment. Full digest for 2023-05-20: https://trump.fm/date/2023-05-20/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2023, May 20). RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/TomFitton/status... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_110403685560850861 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/TomFitton/statuses/1103912..." Truth Social, 20 May. 2023. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_110403685560850861. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/TomFitton/statuses/1103912...," Truth Social, May 20, 2023, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_110403685560850861. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_110403685560850861 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_110403685560850861 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_110403685560850861 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2023-05-20 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_110403685560850861.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._