# Post ts_109827295691582998 - Post ID: `ts_109827295691582998` - Platform: Truth Social - Posted: 2023-02-08T04:45:38.261Z (UTC) - Deleted: no - Repost: no - Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_109827295691582998 - Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_109827295691582998/analysis - Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_109827295691582998.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording) ## Post text > …And on the other subject, NATO would have no money right now if I didn’t get them to put up $450 Billion Dollars of unpaid and delinquent money that no other President was able to get. They’re fighting with the money that I got, not any other President that preceded me, and certainly not this President. Remember the expression, I gave them javelins, Obama gave them sheets, and that’s the way it is, like it or not… ## Engagement - Likes: 22,990 - Reposts: 4,455 - Replies: 222 - Views: unknown - Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.421Z (UTC) # Analysis _Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-24T00:03:07.140Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._ ## Summary This post, filed at 11:45 PM EST during Biden's State of the Union address, exemplifies a reactive narcissistic injury response to political competitor visibility. Trump was watching a rival receive institutional validation and responded with a supply-seeking sequence across multiple posts, culminating in grandiose NATO legacy claims. Authorship is high-confidence authentic: late-night timing, stream-of-consciousness fragment structure (ellipses at both ends), and signature verbal patterns all converge. The post deploys the well-rehearsed "javelins vs. sheets" applause line, personalizing collective NATO spending increases as a debt-collection achievement. Defense mechanisms include pathological distortion (mischaracterizing NATO pledges as "unpaid and delinquent money"), rationalization linking current Ukraine battlefield outcomes to Trump's prior agency, and clean idealization/devaluation splitting. The "like it or not" closure is a characterological marker — authoritative foreclosure of dissent. Cognitively the post shows no deviation from Trump's established baseline: short sentences, binary contrasts, rehearsed talking points, low syntactic complexity. The oscillation across the evening's posts — from vulnerable irritability (McConnell's appearance, Biden's lying) to grandiose self-assertion (NATO achievements) — is consistent with the mixed narcissistic state characteristic of injury-triggered posting sessions. Fact-checking reveals the $450B claim as half-true at best and the uniqueness claim as mostly false. ## Authorship Attribution This post was published at 04:45:38 UTC on February 8, 2023. Trump was almost certainly at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida (EST = UTC−5), placing the local timestamp at **11:45 PM on February 7**. This is firmly within the late-night authentic-posting window. The stylistic evidence is reinforcing: the leading and trailing ellipses signal a stream-of-consciousness fragment, as if captured mid-monologue. The phrasing "like it or not" is a signature Trump verbal closure, the rhetorical question structure of "Remember the expression" treating a self-coined formulation as common knowledge, and the asymmetric sentence rhythm are all consistent with extemporaneous dictation or direct keyboard composition. Confidence: **high** that this is authentic Trump. --- ## Contextual Frame This post is one of at least five Trump Truth Social posts on the evening of February 7–8, 2023, corresponding directly to Biden's State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress. Trump was watching a political rival occupy the most symbolically powerful stage in American political life and receiving institutional validation. This is textbook narcissistic injury by comparison. The posts trace a reactive arc: McConnell's appearance, Biden's stumbling delivery, Biden's alleged lies, and then — twice — Trump's NATO legacy. The NATO posts are the apex of the supply-seeking sequence, where the grievance pivot shifts from attacking Biden to claiming credit for geopolitical outcomes. --- ## Level 1 — Dispositional Traits (Big Five) - **Extraversion (very high):** Dominance, assertiveness, and self-promotion suffuse every clause. The post is built around the speaker as the center of consequential action: "I got," "I gave," "that I got." - **Agreeableness (very low):** Zero modesty. The zero-sum framing — Trump gets all credit, predecessors get none, successor gets contempt — reflects antagonism and competitiveness rather than collaborative self-presentation. - **Conscientiousness (low on deliberation):** The NATO $450B claim is repeated in adjacent posts; the loose numerical attribution and sweeping historical revisionism suggest assertion over verification. - **Neuroticism — Angry Hostility (elevated):** The dismissive final phrase ("like it or not") signals suppressed irritability and a need to foreclose debate. - **Openness (low):** No hedging, no complexity, no acknowledgment of countervailing evidence. The world is simple: Trump acted, others failed. --- ## Level 2 — Characteristic Adaptations **Agency motives dominate:** Power, achievement, and status are the organizing motives. The post asserts unique, irreplaceable efficacy: "no other President was able to get." This is not merely pride — it is a claim to singular necessity. The implicit argument is that NATO's current military capacity for defending Ukraine is downstream of Trump's will, not institutional processes or collective action. **Schema of self:** Uniquely effective, historically unprecedented, vindicated by events. **Schema of others:** Predecessors are weak (Obama gave "sheets"); successor is incompetent ("certainly not this President"); adversaries are indebted to Trump's prior strength whether they acknowledge it or not. **Schema of world:** Transactional. Alliances are deals. Commitment follows leverage. Strength produces results; softness produces dependency. --- ## Level 3 — Narrative Identity **Protagonist role:** The Dealmaker-as-Savior. Trump positions himself as the decisive historical actor whose prior deeds now sustain a current war effort. This is an elaborate legacy claim: even in exile from office, his past force shapes present geopolitical reality. **Narrative sequence:** Contamination with implied redemption. Before Trump: NATO underfunded, Ukraine undefended. During Trump: money extracted, javelins provided. After Trump (implied): the gains persist but are squandered by lesser men. **Identity claims:** "I got countries to pay that hadn't paid" — the Stoltenberg citation from the previous post is used to externalize validation. The appeal to a foreign official's praise is significant: Trump needs the record to be witnessed and confirmed by external authority, not merely asserted. **Contrasting other:** Obama ("gave them sheets") and Biden ("certainly not this President") serve as twin foils — the weak predecessor and the incompetent successor — against whom Trump's singular adequacy is measured. **"Like it or not":** This closing phrase is a characteristic identity marker — it signals a desired immunity from disagreement. The claim is asserted as factual bedrock, not argument. Dissent is pre-emptively framed as motivated denial. --- ## Level 4 — Clinical Indicators ### Malignant Narcissism Assessment - **Narcissistic features (marked):** Grandiosity, claim to uniqueness, need for external validation (Stoltenberg citation), entitlement to credit for collective outcomes, and zero-sum comparison to all predecessors. - **Antisocial features (mild/background):** The deceptive simplification of complex NATO policy dynamics into a personal financial extraction narrative. "Unpaid and delinquent money" misrepresents NATO's funding structure (NATO does not collect dues; defense spending commitments are national pledges, not receivables). - **Paranoid features (low in this post):** Mild in isolation, though the broader evening's posts suggest heightened threat sensitivity (Biden is "lying," the SOTU is a performance requiring counter-programming). - **Ego-syntonic sadism (mild):** The "javelins vs. sheets" contrast contains a pleasurable humiliation of Obama. The satisfaction in the formulation — treating it as a memorable "expression" — suggests relish rather than reluctant correction. ### Narcissistic Dynamics **Trigger:** Biden's State of the Union address constitutes a multi-dimensional narcissistic injury: a rival occupies center stage, receives institutional validation, and implicitly claims credit for outcomes in a domain (Ukraine support, NATO relationships) where Trump asserts ownership. **Narcissistic state:** Oscillating. The McConnell and Biden attack posts reveal a wounded, irritable register (vulnerable state). The NATO posts shift to grandiose — expansive self-promotion, unique achievement claims, dismissal of predecessors. This oscillation across a single evening is characteristic. **Rage:** Low-intensity in this specific post. The anger is sublimated into competitive self-assertion rather than expressed as explicit hostility. The "like it or not" phrase is the residue of irritation rather than expressed rage. --- ## Defense Mechanisms 1. **Distortion (pathological):** The NATO funding mechanism is mischaracterized as debt collection — "unpaid and delinquent money" implies Trump extracted owed funds. In reality, NATO's defense spending commitments are national budget decisions, not receivables with a creditor. This reframes complex geopolitical dynamics into a personal financial triumph. 2. **Rationalization (neurotic):** "They're fighting with the money that I got" constructs a logical chain (Trump extracted money → NATO funded → Ukraine armed) that conveniently makes Trump causally essential to the current war effort he otherwise has little direct connection to. 3. **Idealization/Devaluation (immature):** Trump (idealized as dealmaker-savior) vs. Obama (devalued as naive softness) vs. Biden (devalued as incompetent). The splitting is clean and absolute. --- ## Rhetorical and Propaganda Techniques - **Superlatives and uniqueness claims:** "No other President was able to get" — a sweeping, unverifiable historical claim presented as self-evident. - **Antithesis as ridicule:** "I gave them javelins, Obama gave them sheets" — the contrast works rhetorically because of the bathos (lethal weapons vs. bedding); designed to produce contemptuous laughter. - **Appeal to authority:** Stoltenberg citation (previous post) primes the audience to accept the claim in this post as credentially confirmed. - **Rhetorical pre-emption:** "Like it or not" forecloses debate before it begins — a classic authoritarian rhetorical move that positions disagreement as denial. - **Personalization of collective action:** NATO's increased defense spending (a multi-year institutional process influenced by many variables) becomes "the money that I got" — a complete personal appropriation of collective diplomatic and economic outcomes. - **Temporal anchoring:** "They're fighting with the money that I got" ties current Ukraine battlefield outcomes to Trump's legacy, making the present war implicitly a monument to his prior efficacy. --- ## Cognitive Status No acute markers of cognitive decline in this post. The formulation is coherent, the argument is structurally intact, and the rhetorical devices are well-deployed. The post shows characteristic baseline features: short declarative sentences, repetition for emphasis ("I got... that I got"), and preference for memorable binary contrasts over complex argument. The "javelins vs. sheets" line is a rehearsed formulation used at rallies since approximately 2019, indicating reliance on stabilized talking points rather than novel synthesis — this is baseline behavior, not deviation. **Complexity score:** Moderate-low (consistent with established Trump baseline). No deviation warranting a cognitive flag. --- ## Danger Assessment No danger indicators in this post. The content is political boasting and historical revisionism, with no dehumanizing language, eliminationist framing, or stochastic terrorism indicators. **Danger level: none.** ## Fact Verification | Claim | Verdict | Evidence | |-------|---------|----------| | "NATO would have no money right now if I didn't get them to put up $450 Billion Dollars of unpaid and delinquent money" | **Half True** | NATO member defense spending did increase substantially during Trump's presidency — by roughly $130B+ annually by 2020 compared to 2016 baselines; cumulative multi-year accounting approaches $400-450B depending on methodology. However, 'unpaid and delinquent money' fundamentally mischaracterizes NATO's financial structure: there are no dues or receivables; defense spending pledges are national budget decisions, not debts owed to NATO. Framing this as debt collection is a deliberate distortion of institutional mechanics. | | "I gave them javelins, Obama gave them sheets" | **Mostly True** | Obama's administration provided non-lethal military assistance to Ukraine (including blankets, body armor, night-vision goggles, medical supplies) while explicitly declining to provide lethal weapons, citing escalation concerns. Trump's administration approved Javelin anti-tank missile sales to Ukraine in 2018. The substantive distinction is factually accurate. 'Sheets' is colloquial but not wholly inaccurate as a characterization of the non-lethal package. | | "No other President was able to get NATO spending increases" | **Mostly False** | The 2% GDP defense spending commitment dates to the 2014 NATO Wales Summit under Obama, who also pressed allies on burden-sharing. NATO spending began recovering from post-Cold War lows starting in 2014 following Russia's annexation of Crimea — before Trump took office. Trump was more aggressive and confrontational in enforcement, and spending did accelerate during his term, but the absolute uniqueness claim ignores the institutional trajectory and Obama-era foundation. | Overall Veracity: 50% ## Authorship Analysis **Self-Written** (score: 88%) ### Indicators - Local timestamp of 11:45 PM EST at Mar-a-Lago — deep in authentic late-night posting window - Leading and trailing ellipses indicating stream-of-consciousness fragment, not a composed statement - Signature verbal closure 'like it or not' — consistent with decades of Trump speech pattern - 'Remember the expression' treating self-coined formulation as received wisdom — authentic Trump rhetorical tic - Reactive context (live SOTU counter-programming) matches impulsive authentic posting pattern ## Psychological Profile ### State **Mixed State** **Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Comparison (Biden's State of the Union address) Sentiment: -0.15 **Mildly Hypomanic** - Multiple posts in rapid succession during SOTU evening (at least 5 Truth Social posts in a single session) - Late-night posting energy with elevated self-referential grandiosity - Racing from topic to topic (McConnell appearance → Biden energy policy → Biden delivery → Biden lies → NATO legacy × 2) - Decreased inhibition in public attack on McConnell's physical appearance ### Clinical **Malignant Narcissism:** - Narcissistic: 82% - Antisocial: 25% - Paranoid: 20% - Sadism: 30% **Defense Mechanisms:** - distortion (pathological) - rationalization (neurotic) - idealization (immature) - devaluation (immature) **Cognitive Complexity:** - Complexity: 100% **Parasocial Techniques:** - Rally-tested applause line ('javelins vs. sheets') deployed in written medium to simulate audience response - 'Remember the expression' — inviting followers into shared memory of a formulation, creating in-group cohesion - 'Like it or not' — asserting shared factual ground with followers, positioning dissenters as outside the community of honest observers ## Fact Checks (3) _The model's verdicts from 2026-03-24._ > NATO would have no money right now if I didn't get them to put up $450 Billion Dollars of unpaid and delinquent money **HALF TRUE** NATO member defense spending did increase substantially during Trump's presidency — by roughly $130B+ annually by 2020 compared to 2016 baselines; cumulative multi-year accounting approaches $400-450B depending on methodology. However, 'unpaid and delinquent money' fundamentally mischaracterizes NATO's financial structure: there are no dues or receivables; defense spending pledges are national budget decisions, not debts owed to NATO. Framing this as debt collection is a deliberate distortion of institutional mechanics. Sources: NATO Secretary General annual reports 2016-2020; NATO funding and burden-sharing documentation > I gave them javelins, Obama gave them sheets **MOSTLY TRUE** Obama's administration provided non-lethal military assistance to Ukraine (including blankets, body armor, night-vision goggles, medical supplies) while explicitly declining to provide lethal weapons, citing escalation concerns. Trump's administration approved Javelin anti-tank missile sales to Ukraine in 2018. The substantive distinction is factually accurate. 'Sheets' is colloquial but not wholly inaccurate as a characterization of the non-lethal package. Sources: Congressional Research Service Ukraine reports; Pentagon arms transfer records 2014-2018 > No other President was able to get NATO spending increases **MOSTLY FALSE** The 2% GDP defense spending commitment dates to the 2014 NATO Wales Summit under Obama, who also pressed allies on burden-sharing. NATO spending began recovering from post-Cold War lows starting in 2014 following Russia's annexation of Crimea — before Trump took office. Trump was more aggressive and confrontational in enforcement, and spending did accelerate during his term, but the absolute uniqueness claim ignores the institutional trajectory and Obama-era foundation. Sources: 2014 NATO Wales Summit Defense Investment Pledge; NATO defense expenditure data 2014-2020 Overall Veracity: 50% ## Tags - nato (90%) - ukraine (70%) - obama-comparison (80%) - biden-sotu-response (90%) - self-aggrandizement (85%) - legacy-claim (80%) - late-night-authentic (88%) - narcissistic-supply-seeking (75%) - institutional-distortion (70%) ## That day _From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._ **The Couch Presidency: Trump Live-Trolls Biden's SOTU, Then Pivots to Full Persecution Mode** Trump spent the evening glued to Biden's State of the Union address, firing off dozens of real-time reactions from Mar-a-Lago that ranged from mild performance critiques to racial slurs and homophobic jabs at named politicians. The morning after, he celebrated his own Truth Social traffic before spending the afternoon amplifying election fraud claims tied to the House Twitter Files hearings. The mood was overwhelmingly combative and grandiose — the exiled king grading his successor — with flashes of genuine persecution anxiety surfacing around his mounting legal exposure. It was one of his highest-volume posting days of the year, driven by the competitive sting of watching a rival command the national stage he considers rightfully his. Full digest for 2023-02-08: https://trump.fm/date/2023-02-08/analysis ## Citation - APA: Trump, D. J. (2023, February 8). …And on the other subject, NATO would have no... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_109827295691582998 - MLA: Trump, Donald J. "…And on the other subject, NATO would have no money right..." Truth Social, 8 Feb. 2023. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_109827295691582998. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026. - Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "…And on the other subject, NATO would have no money right...," Truth Social, February 8, 2023, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_109827295691582998. ## For agents - Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt - API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json - MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth) - This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_109827295691582998 - Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_109827295691582998 - All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_109827295691582998 - Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2023-02-08 - The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_109827295691582998.md?analysis=false _Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._