Analysis: What the FBI did with harassing, cajoling, and intimidating ...

3y ago Dec 3, 2022 at 12:16 AM

What the FBI did with harassing, cajoling, and intimidating Big Tech companies into corrupting the 2020 Presidential Vote to the side of the Radical Left is no different in meaning than STUFFING THE BALLOT BOXES, only far more sophisticated and impactful. This is a major and very serious violation of the law, yet they come after me for what virtually every other President has done, and is allowed to do by law, probably as a means of complicating and covering up their massive Election Crime!!!

0:00 0:00

AI Analysis

Machine-generated analysis of the post above on 2026-03-20. Not written by the author of the post.

Danger Level

Elevated

Narcissistic State

Mixed

Authorship

Self-Written

Intensity

72%

This post exemplifies Trump's DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) pattern at full deployment. Seizing on the Twitter Files release, he constructs a false equivalence between routine FBI-tech company communications and literal ballot stuffing, using ALL CAPS to anchor the emotional frame. The psychological core is revealed in the pivot—"yet they come after me"—exposing narcissistic injury from ongoing legal investigations as the driving force. He employs projection (accusing others of election crimes while under investigation), rationalization (claiming presidential precedent), and pathological distortion (equating communication with vote fraud). The post also functions as deflection from the Fuentes dinner controversy dominating news coverage. The mixed narcissistic state—grandiose claims about the scale of the "crime" combined with vulnerable victimhood—is characteristic of his response to legal threat. Danger indicators include continued delegitimization of federal law enforcement and framing the legal system as a political weapon, which contributes to erosion of institutional trust.

Authorship Analysis

Self-Written

Indicators:

Evening posting time (~7:16 PM EST)
ALL CAPS for emphasis (STUFFING THE BALLOT BOXES)
Run-on sentence structure
Emotional escalation pattern
Stream-of-consciousness logic

Psychological Profile

▶ State

Mixed State

Trigger: Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (Ongoing legal investigations and Twitter Files providing deflection opportunity)

Rage: Intensity 70% targeting FBI / DOJ / 'Radical Left'

Proportionality

30%

Sentiment

-0.75

Mildly Hypomanic

Rapid posting cadence (multiple posts same day on same theme)Grandiose framing of personal grievance as national crisis

▶ Clinical

Malignant Narcissism:

Narcissistic

80%

Antisocial

50%

Paranoid

70%

Sadism

20%

Defense Mechanisms:

projectiondistortionrationalizationdenial

Cognitive Complexity:

Complexity

45%

Cognitive Markers:

tangentiality

Parasocial Techniques:

shared grievance framingus-vs-them mobilizationvictim identification

Danger Assessment

Elevated

Indicators:

Delegitimization of FBI and DOJ
Framing legal system as weapon of political opponents
Implying need for action against 'massive Election Crime'

Gaslighting Detected:

Reframing FBI routine communications as election rigging
Claiming 'everybody is now admitting' election was rigged (from prior post)
Normalizing his conduct as what 'every other President has done'

Reality Distortions:

FBI communications with tech companies equated to ballot stuffing
Claim that 'virtually every other President' has done what he's being investigated for
Assertion of 'massive Election Crime' without evidence

Fact Checks (2)

"The FBI harassed, cajoled, and intimidated Big Tech companies into corrupting the 2020 Presidential Vote"

Mostly False

FBI communicated with tech companies about foreign influence operations, which is standard practice. There is no evidence of intimidation or vote corruption.

"What virtually every other President has done, and is allowed to do by law"

False

No other president retained classified documents after leaving office and resisted return, which is the likely reference. The comparison is without precedent.

Receipts

No contradictions with other posts detected yet.

Psychological Analysis: Post ts_109446862314736731

Context

Posted December 2, 2022 at ~7:16 PM EST (Trump likely at Mar-a-Lago). This is an evening post expanding on a theme he'd been hammering all day—FBI contacts with tech companies and the 2020 election. The Twitter Files had just dropped, giving him fresh ammunition. He's also deflecting from the Fuentes dinner controversy.

Authorship

Evening timing, stream-of-consciousness structure, ALL CAPS emphasis, emotional escalation, and the characteristic run-on sentence structure all point to authentic Trump. The post builds from a semi-coherent legal argument into conspiratorial grievance—a classic Trump arc.

Psychological Analysis

This post is a textbook example of projection and DARVO. Trump, facing legal jeopardy (likely referencing the classified documents investigation and Jan 6 committee), reframes himself as the victim while accusing the FBI of the very type of election interference he was investigated for. The phrase "yet they come after me" reveals the narcissistic injury driving the post—legal exposure is the trigger.

The logical structure is notable: he equates FBI communications with tech companies to "STUFFING THE BALLOT BOXES," then immediately hedges by calling it "far more sophisticated"—an implicit acknowledgment that the analogy doesn't hold, papered over with escalation.

Defense Mechanisms

Projection: Accusing opponents of election crimes while under investigation for election-related conduct
Rationalization: "what virtually every other President has done" normalizes his own behavior
Distortion: Equating FBI-tech company meetings with ballot stuffing

Rhetorical Techniques

The post uses false equivalence, persecution narrative, and the firehose approach (multiple overlapping claims in one post making each harder to rebut individually).

Fact Verification

Claim	Verdict	Evidence
"The FBI harassed, cajoled, and intimidated Big Tech companies into corrupting the 2020 Presidential Vote"	Mostly False	FBI communicated with tech companies about foreign influence operations, which is standard practice. There is no evidence of intimidation or vote corruption.
"What virtually every other President has done, and is allowed to do by law"	False	No other president retained classified documents after leaving office and resisted return, which is the likely reference. The comparison is without precedent.

Overall Veracity: 10%