# Post ts_109391680060926334

- Post ID: `ts_109391680060926334`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2022-11-23T06:22:51.242Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_109391680060926334
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_109391680060926334/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_109391680060926334.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> In the Supreme Court, the President of the United States does not have “standing” over his own election, how ridiculous?

## Engagement

- Likes: 37,585
- Reposts: 8,674
- Replies: 1,675
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.428Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-20T00:24:08.015Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This late-night post continues Trump's two-year pattern of delegitimizing institutions that ruled against his 2020 election claims. The possessive framing — "his own election" — reveals an entitlement schema in which democratic elections are personal property. Scare quotes around the legal term "standing" dismiss constitutional doctrine as arbitrary gatekeeping. Part of a same-day cluster (paired with a longer post calling the Supreme Court a "political body" that "lost its honor"), this reflects sustained vulnerable narcissistic injury from institutional rejection. The danger is not in this post alone but in the cumulative erosion of institutional legitimacy through persistent reframing of legal checks as persecution.

## Psychological Analysis: Supreme Court Standing Post (2022-11-23)

This brief post references the Supreme Court's rejection of Trump's claims regarding the 2020 election, specifically the legal concept of "standing." Posted at 1:22 AM EST (Trump was at Mar-a-Lago), this is a classic late-night authentic post — terse, emotionally reactive, ending with a rhetorical question mark after "how ridiculous."

The post distills a complex legal ruling into a simple grievance: the absurdity that a president lacks standing over "his own election." This reflects a fundamental conflation of personal ownership with democratic process — elections belong to the electorate, not the candidate. The possessive framing ("his own election") reveals an entitlement schema.

Combined with the companion post from the same day attacking the Supreme Court for "losing its honor" and refusing to "even look at the Election Hoax of 2020," this post is part of a sustained grievance cluster targeting institutional legitimacy. The pattern: when institutions rule against him, the institutions themselves are delegitimized.

The brevity and punctuation style (quotation marks around "standing" to cast doubt on the legal concept) are characteristic of Trump's authentic voice — dismissing expert/legal frameworks through scare quotes.

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "The Supreme Court ruled the President does not have standing over his own election" | **Mostly True** | The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump v. Wisconsin and other 2020 election challenges, with standing being one basis for rejection. The Court did not broadly rule presidents lack standing — it found insufficient basis in specific cases. |

Overall Veracity: 80%

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 92%)

### Indicators

- 1:22 AM EST posting time at Mar-a-Lago
- Terse, reactive style
- Scare quotes around legal term
- Rhetorical question ending
- No polished formatting

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Vulnerable State**

**Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Defeat (Supreme Court)

**Rage:** Intensity 50% targeting Supreme Court
- Proportionality: 30%

Sentiment: -0.60

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 70%
- Antisocial: 30%
- Paranoid: 40%
- Sadism: 0%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- denial (pathological)
- distortion (pathological)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 30%

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- shared grievance
- rhetorical question inviting audience agreement

## Danger Assessment

**ELEVATED**

### Indicators

- Continued delegitimization of Supreme Court and electoral process
- Part of sustained pattern undermining institutional authority

### Gaslighting

- Implies established legal doctrine is absurd
- Frames election as personal property to distort understanding of democratic process

## Fact Checks (1)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-03-20._

> The Supreme Court ruled the President does not have standing over his own election

**MOSTLY TRUE**

The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump v. Wisconsin and other 2020 election challenges, with standing being one basis for rejection. The Court did not broadly rule presidents lack standing — it found insufficient basis in specific cases.

Sources: Texas v. Pennsylvania (2020); Trump v. Wisconsin Election Commission

Overall Veracity: 80%

## Tags

- election denial (90%)
- institutional delegitimization (80%)
- Supreme Court (90%)
- entitlement schema (70%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Supreme Court Tax Ruling Triggers Multi-Front Institutional Assault on Day Before Thanksgiving**

Trump spent the day before Thanksgiving lashing out at the Supreme Court after it cleared the way for Congress to obtain his tax returns. A late-night posting session from Mar-a-Lago attacked the Court's legitimacy, accusing it of cowardice and corruption despite its conservative supermajority including three of his own appointees. The grievance expanded through the day to encompass the January 6 Committee, Arizona election officials, and the Manhattan DA. The evening's most intense moment was a demand that Arizona "DO THE ELECTION OVER" — echoing the pressure campaigns of 2020. Scattered between the attacks were low-effort retweets seeking praise, a pattern of alternating between victimhood and self-congratulation that defined the day's mood.

Full digest for 2022-11-23: https://trump.fm/date/2022-11-23/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2022, November 23). In the Supreme Court, the President of the United... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_109391680060926334
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "In the Supreme Court, the President of the United States..." Truth Social, 23 Nov. 2022. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_109391680060926334. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "In the Supreme Court, the President of the United States...," Truth Social, November 23, 2022, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_109391680060926334.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_109391680060926334
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_109391680060926334
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_109391680060926334
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2022-11-23
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_109391680060926334.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._