# Post ts_108528658229983217

- Post ID: `ts_108528658229983217`
- Platform: Truth Social
- Posted: 2022-06-23T20:25:03.175Z (UTC)
- Deleted: no
- Repost: no
- Canonical URL: https://trump.fm/post/ts_108528658229983217
- Analysis page: https://trump.fm/post/ts_108528658229983217/analysis
- Audio narration: https://static.trump.fm/audio/ts_108528658229983217.mp3 (a synthesized voice reading the post text, not a recording)

## Post text

> The only thing not discussed by the Unselects, in any way, shape, or form, is the irrefutable evidence of massive and totally pervasive ELECTION FRAUD & IRREGULARITIES which took place during the 2020 Presidential Election. They refuse to go there, they want it all CANCELED, because it would be IMPOSSIBLE for the Unselect Committee to refute or challenge that which would be put before them, or the American Public. To the Unselects I ask, LET US PUT ON THE EVIDENCE, STATE BY STATE - AND NOW!

## Engagement

- Likes: 34,391
- Reposts: 10,977
- Replies: 1,994
- Views: unknown
- Metrics collected: 2026-02-01T01:19:51.440Z (UTC)

# Analysis

_Machine-generated by trump.fm on 2026-03-19T20:54:47.354Z (UTC): a model's reading of this post, not his words. Its psychological terms describe the language, not a clinical assessment of him._

## Summary

This post constitutes a high-intensity narcissistic injury response to the Jan 6 committee's fifth hearing (same day), which publicly documented Trump's pressure campaign against the DOJ. The psychological architecture is a classic grandiose-to-vulnerable oscillation: the post opens in grandiose register (possessing "irrefutable" evidence the committee would find "IMPOSSIBLE" to refute) while revealing the vulnerable substrate (enemies "want it all CANCELED"). The unfalsifiable demand structure — challenge the committee to a hearing whose outcome is predetermined as vindicating — functions simultaneously as dominance display and persecution claim. Defense mechanisms include pathological denial (blanket rejection of 60+ court findings), projection (accusing committee of evidence suppression while documented record shows Trump's own suppression campaign at DOJ), and devaluation via neologistic labeling ("Unselects"). Authorship is assessed as authentic Trump (0.82): the neologism, ALL CAPS bursts, stream-of-consciousness redundancy, and live reactive quality during committee hearings are characteristic. Cognitive status is within established baseline; the election fraud perseveration is thematically fixed since November 2020 and does not indicate new deterioration. Danger is assessed as elevated: no explicit violence, but institutional delegitimization combined with urgency framing maintains the grievance ecosystem that has historically preceded mobilization events. The four-post saturation sequence on a committee hearing day is consistent with the RAND Firehose information disruption model.

# Psychological Analysis: ts_108528658229983217
**Date:** 2022-06-23 | **Platform:** Truth Social | **Subject Age:** 76

---

## I. Authorship Attribution

**Assessment: Likely Authentic Trump (0.82/1.0) | Confidence: Medium**

Post time 20:25 UTC converts to approximately **4:25 PM EDT** (Bedminster, NJ — Trump's typical June residence). This falls within business hours, which slightly lowers confidence. However, several stylistic signatures override the timing caveat: the neologism "Unselects" is a Trump-original coinage used repeatedly; the ALL CAPS emphatic bursts follow his characteristic typographic emotional register; the stream-of-consciousness redundancy ("in any way, shape, or form," "massive and totally pervasive") is inconsistent with aide-drafted prose. Most diagnostically, this post is reactive to the Jan 6 committee's fifth hearing occurring that same day — a live-stimulus response pattern characteristic of authentic Trump posting.

---

## II. Contextual Trigger

The **fifth Jan 6 Select Committee hearing**, held June 23, 2022, focused specifically on Trump's pressure campaign against the Department of Justice — direct, public exposure of alleged misconduct. This constitutes a high-intensity narcissistic injury: not criticism or defeat, but *exposure*. This post is the fourth in a same-day sequence targeting the committee, consistent with a reactive saturation strategy during live hearing coverage.

---

## III. Multi-Level Personality Analysis

### Level 1: Dispositional Traits (Big Five)

| Trait | Expression in Post | Score |
|---|---|---|
| **Neuroticism** | Angry hostility, urgency, vulnerability undercurrent | 0.78 |
| **Extraversion** | Assertive, dominant, imperative address | 0.75 |
| **Agreeableness** | Adversarial, devaluing, contemptuous of process | 0.10 |
| **Conscientiousness** | Achievement-striving present but impulsive | 0.30 |
| **Openness** | Rigid, closed to alternative interpretations | 0.15 |

### Level 2: Characteristic Adaptations

**Agency motives dominate overwhelmingly.** The post is structured entirely around power, control, and status — specifically the perceived theft of each. Communion motives are present only instrumentally: the "American Public" is invoked as a co-litigant audience, not as recipients of genuine concern.

Key schema: *The world is an adversarial arena in which truth-holders are persecuted by corrupt institutional actors.* The self is the sole custodian of suppressed truth; others are either enemies (Unselects) or potential allies requiring activation.

### Level 3: Narrative Identity

- **Protagonist role:** Prosecutorial truth-holder / persecuted martyr (oscillating)
- **Narrative sequence:** Contamination — legitimate electoral victory corrupted by fraud, now further suppressed by a corrupt committee
- **Identity claims:** Possessor of "irrefutable" evidence; champion of the American Public; fighter denied fair hearing
- **Contrasting other:** The "Unselect Committee" — illegitimate, cowardly, suppressive
- **Redemption arc attempted:** The "LET US PUT ON THE EVIDENCE" demand functions as a redemption pivot — from persecuted victim toward triumphant challenger — but the subjunctive framing reveals the hearing is not genuinely sought. The demand is performative.

---

## IV. Clinical Indicators

### Malignant Narcissism (Kernberg)

| Component | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| **Narcissistic features** | 0.82 | Grandiosity ("irrefutable evidence"), entitlement to vindication, belief committee *cannot* challenge his evidence |
| **Paranoid features** | 0.76 | Preoccupation with organized attack, belief in evidence suppression conspiracy |
| **Antisocial features** | 0.55 | Contempt for legitimate democratic oversight, disregard for findings of 60+ courts |
| **Sadism** | 0.30 | Derisive labeling ("Unselects") suggests contempt pleasure, but not primary register |

### Defense Mechanisms

1. **Denial (pathological):** Wholesale claim of "irrefutable" fraud evidence directly contradicts 60+ court dismissals, DOJ findings, state audits.
2. **Projection (immature):** Accuses committee of suppressing evidence; documented record shows Trump's own DOJ pressure campaign to suppress contrary findings.
3. **Rationalization (neurotic):** Committee's legally authorized scope reframed as strategic evasion.
4. **Devaluation (immature):** "Unselects" neologism strips institutional legitimacy.

### Narcissistic Injury Dynamics

**Grandiose-to-vulnerable oscillation:**
- *Grandiose:* "irrefutable evidence," "IMPOSSIBLE to refute"
- *Vulnerable:* "they refuse to go there," "they want it all CANCELED"

Rage intensity: 0.72, markedly disproportionate (proportionality 0.25) — a congressional hearing conducting its mandated investigation is experienced as existential persecution requiring a national, state-by-state intervention "AND NOW."

---

## V. Rhetorical and Propaganda Techniques

The post deploys a **structurally unfalsifiable demand strategy:**

1. Position committee as suppressing evidence → establishes injustice
2. Assert evidence is "irrefutable" and "impossible" to counter → establishes certainty
3. Issue public challenge: "LET US PUT ON THE EVIDENCE" → appears to invite scrutiny

The trap: if the committee complies, Trump claims vindication; if they don't, suppression narrative is confirmed. No counter-evidence can penetrate this closed loop.

**RAND Firehose indicators:** Four posts in a same-day sequence targeting the committee during live hearing coverage — high volume, emotionally escalating, reality-distorting.

---

## VI. Gaslighting and Reality Distortion

**DARVO pattern:**
- **Deny:** The election was fraudulent (denial of documented outcome)
- **Attack:** Committee members are "Unselects" running a "Kangaroo Court"
- **Reverse Victim and Offender:** Trump — subject of hearing for alleged misconduct — repositions himself as persecuted party denied fair hearing

The claim that the committee "refuses to discuss" election fraud inverts actual reality: the fifth hearing that same day specifically addressed Trump's use of fraud claims to pressure DOJ officials.

---

## VII. Cognitive Status Assessment

**Within normal range for Trump's aggressive-reactive posting mode.**

The post shows characteristic redundant intensification, some circumlocution ("that which would be put before them"), and perseveration on the election fraud theme (consistent with established pattern since Nov 2020). Syntactic complexity is moderate; logical flow is internally consistent within its distorted premises. No word-finding difficulty, semantic paraphasia, or temporal confusion detected. **No deviation from established cognitive baseline.**

---

## VIII. Order/Chaos Dynamics

**Positioning:** Order Attacker + Order Restorer

The committee represents *corrupt order*; Trump positions himself as the agent who will restore *proper order* by putting on the evidence "STATE BY STATE." The framing appeals to federalist legitimacy structures while simultaneously delegitimizing the federal oversight body.

---

## IX. Archetypal Analysis

**Primary:** Warrior + Persecuted Truth-Teller

The post enacts the warrior archetype in its most embattled form — fighting not an external enemy but a corrupt internal order. The call "LET US PUT ON THE EVIDENCE" has quasi-judicial-heroic resonance: the champion demanding a fair trial before the people.

**Shadow projection:** The accusation that the committee suppresses evidence projects onto opponents exactly what Trump's documented conduct involved — pressure on DOJ officials to validate false fraud claims and install Jeffrey Clark as a compliant acting AG.

---

## X. Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| "Irrefutable evidence of massive and totally pervasive ELECTION FRAUD" exists | **False** | 60+ courts dismissed; DOJ (Barr) found no fraud sufficient to alter outcome; state audits confirmed Biden's win |
| Committee refuses to discuss election fraud "in any way, shape, or form" | **Mostly False** | Fifth hearing that day directly documented Trump's use of fraud claims to pressure DOJ |
| Committee could not refute evidence Trump would present | **Unverifiable** | Hypothetical; all prior proceedings where Trump's legal team presented evidence resulted in dismissals |

---

## XI. Danger Assessment

**Level: Elevated**

No eliminationist language or explicit calls to violence. However: sustained institutional delegitimization, grievance amplification around a claim operationalized by domestic extremists, and urgency injection ("AND NOW!") maintain the radicalization ecosystem without directing it toward acute action.

## Fact Verification

| Claim | Verdict | Evidence |
|-------|---------|----------|
| "Irrefutable evidence of massive and totally pervasive election fraud exists from the 2020 Presidential Election" | **False** | 60+ courts dismissed fraud claims for lack of evidence; Attorney General Barr stated DOJ found no evidence of fraud sufficient to alter the election outcome; Republican-led state audits including Arizona confirmed Biden's victory |
| "The Unselect Committee refuses to discuss election fraud evidence in any way, shape, or form" | **Mostly False** | The committee's fifth hearing (same day, June 23 2022) directly documented Trump's use of fraud claims to pressure DOJ officials including Jeffrey Rosen and Richard Donoghue; the committee extensively addressed fraud allegations throughout its proceedings |
| "It would be impossible for the committee to refute the evidence Trump would present" | **Unverifiable** | Hypothetical claim; no such evidentiary proceeding occurred. All prior legal proceedings where Trump's legal team presented evidence resulted in dismissals for lack of merit. |

Overall Veracity: 23%

## Authorship Analysis

**Self-Written** (score: 82%)

### Indicators

- Characteristic neologism 'Unselects' — a derogatory portmanteau consistent with Trump's pattern of coining dismissive labels for opponents
- ALL CAPS emphatic bursts ('ELECTION FRAUD', 'CANCELED', 'IMPOSSIBLE', 'AND NOW!') — a core stylistic signature
- Stream-of-consciousness structure with redundant intensifiers ('in any way, shape, or form', 'massive and totally pervasive')
- Urgent, imperative close ('STATE BY STATE - AND NOW!') consistent with emotional reactivity under perceived threat
- Post time 20:25 UTC = ~4:25 PM EDT (likely Bedminster, NJ) falls within business hours, slightly lowering confidence, but reactive quality during live committee hearing is characteristic of authentic Trump

## Psychological Profile

### State

**Mixed State**

**Trigger:** Narcissistic Injury — Exposure (January 6 Select Committee fifth hearing — same day — focused on Trump's pressure campaign against the DOJ)

**Rage:** Intensity 72% targeting House January 6 Select Committee and its members
- Proportionality: 25%

Sentiment: -0.72

**Mildly Hypomanic**
- Four posts in a single day targeting the same subject during live hearing
- Urgency and pressure-of-speech quality ('AND NOW!')
- Grandiose certainty about possessing uniquely 'irrefutable' evidence
- Escalating intensity across same-day post sequence

### Clinical

**Malignant Narcissism:**
- Narcissistic: 82%
- Antisocial: 55%
- Paranoid: 76%
- Sadism: 30%

**Defense Mechanisms:**
- denial (pathological)
- projection (immature)
- rationalization (neurotic)
- devaluation (immature)

**Cognitive Complexity:**
- Complexity: 44%

Cognitive Markers:
- perseveration

**Parasocial Techniques:**
- Direct address to audience ('the American Public')
- Shared-enemy framing rallying followers around suppressed evidence conspiracy
- Urgency injection ('AND NOW!') to activate follower arousal and grievance
- Closed epistemic loop: evidence is 'irrefutable' therefore any failure to find it proves suppression

## Danger Assessment

**ELEVATED**

### Indicators

- Sustained institutional delegitimization of congressional oversight body consistent with pre-mobilization communication patterns
- Grievance amplification around stolen-election claim — documented precursor narrative to Jan 6, here reinforced 19 months post-event
- Urgency framing ('AND NOW!') activates follower arousal without directing toward specific peaceful action
- Four-post same-day saturation sequence during live hearing — information environment flooding

### Gaslighting

- DARVO pattern: Deny (election was fraudulent), Attack (committee is 'Unselects' running 'Kangaroo Court'), Reverse Victim and Offender (Trump — subject of hearing for alleged misconduct — repositioned as persecuted party denied fair hearing)
- Reframes committee's legally authorized investigation as suppression of evidence, inverting documented reality
- Asserts evidence is simultaneously 'irrefutable' and 'never examined' — closed loop preemptively invalidating counter-findings
- Inverts documented reality: committee's fifth hearing addressed Trump's fraud claims against DOJ; post claims committee 'refuses to discuss' them in 'any way, shape, or form'

## Fact Checks (3)

_The model's verdicts from 2026-03-19._

> Irrefutable evidence of massive and totally pervasive election fraud exists from the 2020 Presidential Election

**FALSE**

60+ courts dismissed fraud claims for lack of evidence; Attorney General Barr stated DOJ found no evidence of fraud sufficient to alter the election outcome; Republican-led state audits including Arizona confirmed Biden's victory

Sources: DOJ statements Nov-Dec 2020; Arizona Senate audit report Sept 2021; Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin court decisions 2020-2021

> The Unselect Committee refuses to discuss election fraud evidence in any way, shape, or form

**MOSTLY FALSE**

The committee's fifth hearing (same day, June 23 2022) directly documented Trump's use of fraud claims to pressure DOJ officials including Jeffrey Rosen and Richard Donoghue; the committee extensively addressed fraud allegations throughout its proceedings

Sources: Jan 6 Committee Hearing 5, June 23 2022

> It would be impossible for the committee to refute the evidence Trump would present

**UNVERIFIABLE**

Hypothetical claim; no such evidentiary proceeding occurred. All prior legal proceedings where Trump's legal team presented evidence resulted in dismissals for lack of merit.

Overall Veracity: 23%

## Tags

- election-fraud-narrative (95%)
- jan6-committee-response (90%)
- narcissistic-injury-response (85%)
- institutional-delegitimization (88%)
- DARVO (82%)
- epistemic-closure (87%)
- neologistic-labeling (75%)
- unfalsifiable-demand (80%)
- grandiose-vulnerable-oscillation (78%)
- saturation-posting (72%)

## That day

_From trump.fm's machine-generated digest of the day, not his words._

**Two-Front Defensive Day: J6 Hearing Exposure Meets McConnell Intraparty War Over Guns**

Trump fought on two fronts — lashing out at Mitch McConnell over gun legislation and rapid-firing dismissals of the January 6 committee hearing that detailed his pressure campaign on the Justice Department. The mood was combative all day, with a concentrated afternoon burst of four posts in under an hour aimed at discrediting committee testimony. He warned Republican senators of electoral consequences for supporting gun safety measures, even as the Supreme Court handed gun rights advocates a landmark victory that same day. A minor name scramble — calling "True the Vote" by the wrong name — was the only notable cognitive slip in an otherwise tactically organized but emotionally charged day.

Full digest for 2022-06-23: https://trump.fm/date/2022-06-23/analysis

## Citation

- APA: Trump, D. J. (2022, June 23). The only thing not discussed by the Unselects, in... [Social media post]. Truth Social. trump.fm. https://trump.fm/post/ts_108528658229983217
- MLA: Trump, Donald J. "The only thing not discussed by the Unselects, in any way,..." Truth Social, 23 Jun. 2022. trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_108528658229983217. Accessed 9 Oct. 2026.
- Chicago: Donald J. Trump, "The only thing not discussed by the Unselects, in any way,...," Truth Social, June 23, 2022, archived at trump.fm, https://trump.fm/post/ts_108528658229983217.

## For agents

- Site overview: https://trump.fm/llms.txt
- API specification: https://trump.fm/openapi.json
- MCP server: https://trump.fm/mcp (search and fetch tools, no auth)
- This post as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/posts/ts_108528658229983217
- Analysis as JSON: https://trump.fm/api/analysis/ts_108528658229983217
- All citation formats: https://trump.fm/api/cite/ts_108528658229983217
- Same day: https://trump.fm/date/2022-06-23
- The record alone, without the analysis: https://trump.fm/post/ts_108528658229983217.md?analysis=false

_Markdown view of a trump.fm page. Post, analysis, date, feed, contradictions, search and about pages answer in markdown at their URL with `.md` appended (`/index.md` for the home page), or when sent `Accept: text/markdown`._