Popular Posts

Fox News alert. The Congressional Task Force just surveyed the site where Trump was almost assassinated. At the same time, another group of congressmen in DC held a separate forum investigating the shooting. Other than a few congressmen, everyone's given up on the story. A former president's head was almost blown up on live TV and we still don't know anything about the shooter. The media should be knocking on doors every day, but it's just Fox and the New York Post doing the legwork. The Post talked to a neighbor who said the shooter's family is an enigma. Quote, "Everybody around here knows each other, but no one knows them. You can ask anybody on the street. They barely know these people. I didn't even know their names." And the police aren't even stationed in the shooter's neighborhood anymore. It's been weeks since police were here. There's nothing happening. No police activity. That same neighbor who wants to remain anonymous says she doesn't think the shooter acted alone. What went on in that house? Why didn't they know their son was going through whatever he was going through or did their son thought the way that he thought? I don't think he acted alone. That would be my best guess. Today we're finding out the shooter's father hired a powerhouse criminal lawyer. Mr. Crooks hired John Quinn and Matthew Loge out of the Pittsburgh firm, Quinn Loge. These two guys are ranked as some of the top 50 lawyers in the country. They're super lawyers. How does the assassin's dad have the money to hire lawyers like this? And why did you have to hire defense lawyers if you had no idea what your son was up to? And who recommended the dad hire these lawyers? And did you know that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the assassin, was cremated just days after July 13th? The FBI didn't want to hold on to the body? Why not? And why are the authorities not cooperating with the investigators? All I can really tell you is the Secret Service, the FBI are basically dragging their feet. They're stowalling us. And we've gotten some transcribed interviews, but the documents we request are heavily redacted. They're delivered, you know, the day of the interview, so we really can't use the documents to conduct the interviews effectively. So we're not getting squat from my standpoint from the Secret Service or the FBI. We have to rely on leaks to hear the truth. One whistleblower told Senator Josh Hawley that the top brass at Secret Service headquarters told agents to not request extra manpower for the rally where Trump was shot. Why would he do that? Why not just deny the request? Why make a point of telling them not to ask? Was it because they didn't want the denial of extra manpower for Trump in writing? The allegation contradicts the Secret Service director's testimony. He said Trump wasn't denied resources for that rally. We're also finding out that at least five Secret Service agents were placed on leave after the shooting, including the head of the Pittsburgh field office who was in charge of the security at the Trump rally and the site agent who was in charge of devising the security plan. That agent was actually on Trump's detail. We don't know if they were placed on leave for disciplinary reasons or something else, but it's also been reported that the day before Trump was shot, local police set aside radios for the Secret Service, but the Secret Service never picked them up. So when local police were radioing that there was a man on the roof, the Secret Service never heard it. They apparently didn't know Crooks was up there until he fired shots. This story isn't adding up. How could the Secret Service be that incompetent? Was Crooks working alone? Congressman Mike Wald says this. I find that hard to believe and I want to see where's the proof? How did he learn to build those IEDs? How did he learn to install remote detonators? How did he conduct those searches and not get popped? Crooks was using three foreign encrypted apps to send messages. The FBI cracked into two of the three, they say, but they won't tell us what's in them. They also found 700 messages sent on social media, but a source says to the Post that it's possible they weren't written by Crooks, maybe by an older family member. Quote, "Some of the comments were years old. They didn't think the language matched what would be expected from a 15 or 16 year old. So there was some discussion over whether it could have been his dad or a shared account. Just like with the JFK assassination, the intel agencies are going to try to hide the full story from us. But a lot of people inside those agencies aren't happy. We expect to see a lot more leaks from whistleblowers, which gives us hope that we might one day find out what really happened in Butler. Congressman Cory Mills this year. Congressman, a lot's happened in the last 72 hours with this story. What are you seeing now? Well look, we had our very first hearing today, if you will, our forum where we had Ben Schafer, who is one of the actual counter snipers that was on the ground there. He confirmed not only what type of a sophisticated explosive device that Thomas Crooks had, as well as for the multi-channel detonator. But he also confirmed two key things. One, that the Secret Service refused the offer of communication platforms to be able to ensure that everyone has a comms channel that they can utilize. And two, that they were offered a surveillance drawn by local law enforcement and once again the Secret Service refused to utilize it. So now we have three things, Jesse. We have no comms plan and no communications, which is refused. We have no increase in presence by the Secret Service as they claimed. They didn't want to make the offer. That was refused. We had no surveillance drawn capability or way to be able to get views onto the AGR building because it was refused. The question now becomes why was the Secret Service setting this up for failure by not going forward and utilizing all the available assets and resources to ensure the safety and security of former President Donald J. Trump. What could their possible explanation be for refusing all of this stuff? Well again I think that they're gonna try and run this whole idea of negligence or the fact that they're gonna try and say that it was the fault of three or four the officers. The bottom line stops at the director themselves and I can tell you we asked Dan Bongino today, former Secret Service officer, whether or not he feels safer with Ronald Rowe at the seat and he said absolutely not. Look this is a culture of a foster DEI society whereby they are not trying to send their best. I went through a plethora of lists since 2023 to 2024 of all the failed and missteps that has been taken by the Secret Service. So I can tell you it is a culture issue, it is DEI at heart, but this is either criminal gross negligence or purposeful intent and that's where set out to actually find. All right well I hope you find out what happened. Thank you so much Congressman.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.