Popular Posts

once. She said that she wanted to disband ICE altogether. At one point she called ICE agents or border agents, Ku Klux Klansmen, right, on the horses and she will defend the legality in her view. She's supposed to be a prosecutor and she's said all the ones that crossed over illegally are really legal and we have to do whatever we can, however expensive the entitlements, to help them here. She will bankrupt the country on that as well as other entitlement proposals. That means just she will never, Kelly Andrew, she will never get out of the box of the open borders of the Biden administration and she added to all that because of her statements about the border agents and the ICE and the rest of the story.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Now, New York, what do we have? Let's not forget we have a DA, a Soros DA, a Democrat DA. He breathes life into a case that was rejected ultimately by the prior DA, another Democrat. And what is that about? Nondisclosure agreements. Nondisclosure agreements. It is a completely phony case. There's over 30 charges of federal crimes against the President of the United States. He takes misdemeanors, and they weren't even misdemeanors, but he takes them, turns them into felonies, makes these preposterous allegations. And that's the first set of indictments. Every one of these prosecutors is conflicted. Alvin Bragg, a Soros prosecutor, a radical Democrat in Manhattan, and he ran on charging Donald Trump. Fannie Willis, a radical elected Democrat who's fundraising off the charges against Donald Trump for her next election. Jack Smith, a former top official in the Eric Holder Department of Justice, worked closely with him, with former FBI director James Comey and his general counsel Andrew Weissman, who's all over MSNBC spewing his stupidity. And of course, Smith's wife is a Democrat activist and Obama's sycophant with a long record of prosecutorial abuses of process, that is Jack Smith, pressuring and threatening witnesses, bankrupting criminal targets, leaking campaigns with friendly reporters, like Haberman over there at the New York Times, other news outlets, the Washington Post, CNN, and so forth. Now, let's step back. This DA in Atlanta, as well as Jack Smith, what are they doing? What have they done? Alan Dershowitz wrote an important piece for the Daily Mail. Among other things, he says, during the course of our challenges, since Bush Gory was representing the people of Palm Beach County in that litigation. Many tactics similar to those employees in 2020 were attempted. Lawyers wrote legal memoranda outlining possible courses of conduct, including proposing a slate of alternate electors who would deliver our preferred election results to Congress. This is normal. In 2000, Florida state officials were lobbied to secure recounts in selected counties, which we thought the tally would favor us. We were trying to find at least 600 votes that would change the result. The new indictment features Trump's phone call with Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, which was captured in an audio recording. In the conversation, Trump asks him to find 12,000 votes. In my mind, says Dershowitz, this call is among the most exculpatory pieces of evidence. Trump was entitled as a candidate to ask a Georgia state official to locate votes that he believes were not counted. Trump was told that in some of these Republican counties that the votes aren't in yet or they can't, you know, actually find the ballots in the votes. And he says, well, can't you find whatever it is, 11 or 12,000 votes? That's it. In 2000, attempts were made to influence various Florida officials to recount the votes. Now the former president's request that Georgia's Speaker of the House reconsider the count was being considered as soliciting a public official to violate his oath. You understand the extent to which the criminal activity is the criminal activity of the Biden administration, the Department of Justice, Merrick Garland and Jack Smith. They are the criminals. Let's look at what Hillary Clinton did. Oh, I know the media hate to do this because the media are frauds, unfreedom of the press, an entire book on what the media have done to this country. This is not a free press. This is a problem. Russia type press. This is a state press. This is a press that everything I'm telling you right now, they will never discuss. They will never have a legal analyst on there discussing it. The people who watch these programs, even though they have very, very small audiences, the big part of their audience members of Congress, people in the White House, other press and influencers. That's their audience. That's their audience. As for these judges, judges are flesh and blood. They're human beings too. And some of them are better than others. Some of them are radical activists, Democrats. Some of them are brilliant and objective. Unfortunately, Trump is getting most of the former. Tired book on that too. Men in black. So what did Hillary Clinton do? She walks the country free. She's gaggling all over the place. She's getting into friendly media. She's laughing about all these indictments. Hillary Clinton should be in prison for her entire life. Over 4,500 criminal statutes in the US code that exist today. The one mostly used are conspiracy, false statements, money laundering, obstruction, perjury, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, tax evasion. Hillary Clinton. To convict Clinton, it must be shown that she acknowledged that classified emails were contained on her private server. And they said the most recent tally by the State Department of their review of 30,000 Clinton emails indicates at least 671 emails sent or received by Clinton contained classified information. This fact stands in stark contrast to the statement she gave to reporters in July of that year when she said, "I'm confident that I've never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent or received." According to the October 16th Fox News report, the FBI is also looking to see if Clinton committed gross negligence on the Espionage Act for failure to keep national defense information safe. 18 U.S.C. 793. They're using that against Trump. Notably, the information doesn't necessarily have to be marked as classified to violate the statute. The article citing an intelligence community source who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the intelligence source said, "The subsection requires a lawful possession of national defense information by a security clearance holder who through gross negligence, such as the use of an unsecured computer network, permits the material to be removed or abstracted from its proper secure location." She even hired an IT person on her own, Don, who works for the Department of State to handle the server. That's how much she didn't want anyone to know about the server. By the way, that's a crime too. You're not allowed to subsidize or receive private moneys for doing what is a government job, and that's sort of what he was doing for her at her request, but nobody talks about that. She destroyed over 30,000 e-mails. They destroyed their cell phones. Nobody was dragged in front of a grand jury. There was no search done of her home for any other servers or information. She did an interview. Her staff was permitted to be there. Her lawyers were permitted to be there. Her lawyers destroyed this information based on header information, not substantive information, and she escaped. In the Presidential Records Act that applies to Trump, which gives the president authority over documents like no other official in the government, including a secretary of state or an ex-secretary of state, she didn't have that defense. She didn't have that statute. Trump has that, and he's charged with 40 counts. And he's charged with a total of 91 counts from these three prosecutors. Now, let's look at the Bidens quickly. You have a U.S. attorney, stupidly appointed by Bill Barr, not a special counsel, who for five and a half years, five and a half years investigating under Biden, during the course of the five and a half years, he allows the most significant tax violations to run, that is, outrun the statute of limitations. So good is he at this, that Merrick Garland then appoints him a special counsel to give him more protection and more authority. Shortly after he's appointed a special counsel, another statute runs last week. Did you hear about that? Involving possible bribery. That one's now off the table. This guy created the sweetheart deal and he approved it until the judge stopped them. And now Hunter Biden's lawyers saying, you know, this judge is biased. We need a new judge. That's the guy they pick. The Bidens are involved in bribery, extortion, money laundering, false statements, fraud, far violations and more. No investigation of Joe Biden whatsoever. No grand jury, no U.S. attorney, no special counsel, no public integrity section, nothing. And the man receives tens of millions of dollars, his family does, just because his family is so important. None of them have a real job, not one of them. But they received tens of millions of dollars from the communist Chinese, over $31 million, according to Peter Schweizer, nearly $50 million, according to Congresswoman Mace. We don't even know it's so big. And he's the president of the United States who was bought and paid for, as is his family. Not one investigation of Joe Biden. Look what they're doing to Trump. Look how they're breaking the Constitution. Look how they're breaking the law. The law is being used to destroy the law, very fast now. Be right back.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

But here's the issue. The case should never have been brought. The truth is that there are people, criminals, defendants in jail on violent crimes long before this indictment was brought against Donald Trump, whose case should have been prioritized as opposed to their reaching out and pulling out the most recent case where the defendant is not charged with a violent crime who is not in jail and they're saying, "Let's try this first." Why? It's political. It's all political.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.