Popular Posts

Here's the attitude the Democrat Party started the week with. The White House shouldn't be able to direct the attorney general to go around prosecuting if he ever we're not. We can't overcome the politicization of the criminal justice system. The awesome power of the state. You can't have a situation where whoever's in charge of the government starts using that to go after their political enemies or reward their friends, right? When I saw this clip, I had to ask, what is he smoking? This is the guy who led the 2016 coup against the duly elected president, Donald Trump. Obama weaponized his Justice Department as the shock troops of the operation. Not only that, he kept that operation running for almost a decade. Now he's confessing he knows the republic can't survive what he did. So why is he smiling? By the end of the week, that smile got wiped off his face, and I'm going to show you why. I'm Barbara Boyd, and I've documented this coup since it began in 2016. It was a British intelligence instigated coup. Today I'm going to show you the three blows that wipe that smile off Barack Obama's face. First, how his hand-picked puppet Q Starmer just got buried in a Labour Party bloodbath. Second, the Virginia Supreme Court bombshell that blew up Obama's most aggressive gerrymander in the country and reset the entire 2026 midterm map. And third, how JD Vance in Iowa and an outsider candidate in LA just exposed the one thing Obama's manufactured Democrats can never face. But before we dig in, hit the like button and share this video. It increases our reach on YouTube. Let's start across the pond where the British Labour Party, the brain for the Democrats here, got schlacked in local elections, losing some 1,800 local races, control of the parliament in Wales, and further loss of control over the parliament in Scotland. Leonid Morgan, Wales's leader who lost her seat, said it was time for Labour to get back to being the party of the working class. Like Democrats here, Labour has totally abandoned that mission. Now Obama had tried to turn Starmer into an actual personality, even taking credit for Starmer's 2024 victory. He counseled him and told him to be authentic. That mentorship produced what British commentator Jonathan Cook called the UK's first totally synthetic laboratory grown prime minister. Starmer continued London's disastrous green energy crusade, open border immigration policies, including protection of rape gangs and permanent war against Russia and Ukraine while raising taxes and cutting welfare. He jailed anti-immigrant protesters for their speech. But most of all, he kept scheming against Trump and Trump's destruction of the rotten globalist order that give people like him and Obama political power. Starmer called the Iran war a violation of international law, initially denying the US the use of British bases, the same in your face strategy the UK led in sabotaging Trump's quest for peace between Russia and Ukraine. But when Trump moved to deny Iran a nuclear weapon, the resulting energy disruption consigned the Labour Party and probably Starmer himself to the dustbin of history. Nigel Farage's reform party surged and now controls many local councils. It campaigned on ending open borders and ending net zero, correctly attributing the UK's cost of living increases made even worse by the Iran war to the insane net zero energy policy. That's the same deadly energy policy Obama and Joe Biden imposed on the United States. As of this morning, Obama has been meeting with candidates Mark Carney along with Alex Soros to see what can be salvaged in the UK and to map new fronts in the war against our country. Now, if what I just told you about the marriage of the UK, Canada, and Europe's globalists with America's Democrats is a surprise, you need to subscribe to our free newsletter at PrometheanAction.com. We'll put you on the real battlefield between sovereign nations like the world Donald Trump is now creating and the imperial financiers who have been this nation's enemies for 250 years. The link is in the description. That brings us back home to a ruling that came down yesterday morning that the Democratic Party is still reeling from. The Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-3 decision struck down the congressional redistricting referendum the Democrats ran through last month. The map is dead. Virginia runs its 2026 midterms under the existing districts, and here's what's actually going on because the press is as usual lying and covering it up. After President Trump encouraged Republican-led states like Texas to redraw their maps to reflect the actual electorate, the Democratic Party under the personal direction of Barack Obama, who has run the redistricting operation for years through his all-on-the-line group, decided to retaliate. California redo its maps. Virginia attempted the most aggressive partisan gerrymander in the country, turning a 6-5 Democratic map into a 10-1 Democratic map. Wiping out four Republican seats in a state, Trump nearly lost by 5%. They thought this would win them the house and secure Barack Obama's political future. That's why he was so cocky in the interview we just played. To do it, they bypassed the bipartisan redistricting commission Virginia voters had approved by constitutional amendment in 2020. They rammed a new amendment through the legislature on an illegal fast-track and put it on a special ballot in April, spending over $5 million in taxpayer money with outside groups spending nearly $100 million more. The referendum language was deliberately misleading. Congress called it a temporary measure, restoring fairness, when the rigged maps were supposed to guarantee the House in 2026, secure the presidency in 2028, and secure Democratic majorities through the 2030 midterms. Their map ate or consolidated the districts Trump won, making the whole election Northern Virginia dependent where Trump lost. The Supreme Court of Virginia threw the whole thing out, laying out in painstaking detail how the Democrats violated the Virginia constitution by using that illegal fast-track. The vote, the court said, had been fatally poisoned. But Obama's redistricting fantasies didn't just blow up here. The Supreme Court's April 29th decision in Louisiana versus Kelly's outlawed race-based gerrymandering nationwide, setting off a redistricting scramble throughout the red state South and calling into question California's map, which was explicitly based on race. And the Colette's decision laid out why Texas' redistricting was not a political whim of Donald Trump. The redistricting there eliminated racially gerrymandered districts. In an instant, the midterm map shifted from Democratic certainty to wins for Trump's Republicans. That's why Democrats are engaged this Saturday in what George Washington law professor Jonathan Duterte aptly called a prolonged primal scream. Because of the Iran war, we've missed big parts of the actual dynamic shaping the midterms. We've got momentum on redistricting because the Virginia court had the stones to call theft what it was, pure theft. But what about communicating the policies that will actually destroy Obama's insurrection against the republic, the president's policies? The answer isn't more polished messaging, it's real authenticity, not the fake kind. Two examples this week show you what that looks like. First, watch Vice President JD Vance's red meat speech to Iowa Republicans at a factory that makes steel grills for big trucks. Here's one part just for the flavor. So what happened for 41 years? We all know the story. The factories closed down. My hometown. This is the story of my hometown where I grew up in a community that was proud where people built things, where new homes were being made. And by the time I graduated from high school, the manufacturers were laying people off. Those big, beautiful factories were shuttering their doors. And we never had a political movement that said enough is enough until Donald J. Trump and Zach Nunn came along. There was all sorts of stuff about national prosecutions of the Democrats' entitlement fraud schemes, barring foreign ownership of farmland, and doing more for our nation's farmers. Listen to the whole speech and you'll see that. But when Vance reached for the souls of his audience, he did it the way only authentic people came. He talked about the emotions he would encounter if his six-year-old son later decided to follow him into the military and what it means to give your life for this country. Here's the last part. And it hit me that every time we lose somebody, every time somebody goes overseas and sacrifices their life, every time that a person gives the ultimate sacrifice to the United States of America, we often read about it as a line on a newspaper or online. But there's a father and there's a mother and there's a grandma and aunts and uncles and a whole crew of people who love them the same way that we all love every single member of our family. And you take that love and you set that on one side, and you consider the balance that all of us owe, because on the other side is we have to meet their sacrifice by carrying something forward that they can't carry forward. We have to make this country worthy of that sacrifice. You remember that movie, Saving Private Ryan, it's one of my favorite movies. And at the very end, right before one of the soldiers takes his last breath, he looks up and he says, "earn this." That's what is at stake in these midterms, just like it was at Gettysburg when Abe Lincoln struck a similar theme. You might have also seen this week the AI videos going viral on social media for the outsider candidate Spencer Pratt in the L.A. mayor's race. Pratt lost his home in the Pacific Palisades Fire and has been waging a relentless campaign on the failure of California's democratic leadership ever since. A filmmaker named Charles Curran produced an AI-generated ad supporting Pratt. Here's part of how it goes. Please, I'm begging you. There's homeless drug addicts in front of the schools. My children aren't safe. Look, if you were a transgender migrant, I could get you a free pussy. Let's move the drug addicts closer. Bass already solved a crime. I endorse her. The DSA agents you see in that flick, dragging people into the aristocracy's feast, are democratic socialists of America, the Jacobin Democrats who have taken over that party. The Pratt campaign itself is producing similar short videos, dramatizing the destruction of the once golden state in ways words alone cannot. Recent polling shows Pratt tied with Mayor Karen Bass in second place, and his videos are catching fire all over the country. That's the point. A guy who lost his house in a fire with a filmmaker friend and an AI tool is doing more damage to the LA democratic machine than $100 million of consultants ever could. Because what he's saying is true, and people can feel it. That's the asymmetric power of authentic outsider messaging against a manufactured aristocracy. Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, this guy Pratt, authentic patriotic Americans talking straight to the people in a way manufactured politicians like Obama, Starmer, and the Jacobin Democrats can never do. So here's where we are this Saturday. Across the pond, Obama's hand-picked synthetic prime minister just got buried by working-class British voters who's had enough of green energy fantasies, open borders, and permanent war. Here at home, the Virginia Supreme Court called Obama's gerrymandering operation what it is, theft. Louisiana ruling means race-based mapper being as finished as a national strategy. And on the campaign trail, J.D. Vance is talking to Iowans about what it means to give your life for this country, while a guy who lost his house in the Pacific Palisades fire is running circles around the LA democratic machine with 30-second AI videos. Manufactured politicians lose to truth tellers. Like the social media cyborg gets buried by addressing the realities people face from the heart. That's the lesson of the entire Trump era, and it's why Obama smiles the way he does. He fears his project is done, and the only thing left for him to do is to pretend otherwise. The midterm map just shifted. The British operation is being rolled up. The people are waking up, but we're not there yet. If you want to be on the real battlefield, not the one legacy media or social media cyborg shows you, but the actual fight between empire and sovereign nations that has shaped American politics for 250 years, then join us. This battle for the midterms has just been joined, although the doom scrollers and the media will try to convince you to stay out because the country's lost. That's the cyborg we fight here every single day. We need to expand to win, become a supporting member or contributor. Losing is really not an option. This is when you're shouting to me, "Wrap, thanks for listening." Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at PrometheanAction.com.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

This is a great interview, by the way. I'm really enjoying watching this. I love that the president makes time to do these great chemistry. I'm just enjoying it. I love hearing from the president. I love that he makes the time to talk endlessly with the press and talk directly to the American people about this. And if you notice, the socialist candidates always come for law and order first, and that's by design. They have to get rid of police. They have to get rid of ICE. They have to get rid of the guardrails that keep society safe so that they can push through their agenda. And what we've seen is a lot of these socialist candidates, they're pretty slick talkers, right? We've seen the mom donnies. We've seen some of these socialist candidates. They're real slick, but you notice the stance that they all distance from when they're pressed on it is law and order. Anytime they have passed comments about defund the police, they try to score them away for those because they don't want to have to own that because they know how unpopular that is with the American people. The president also mentioned Michigan, you know? He won Michigan in 2024. Yeah, he said that. And he did that partly, I just wanted, because it's so important, historic win for him. He won it partly by winning Arab American Democrats. He flipped the endorsement of the Democrat mayor in Hamlet track, Michigan, America leave. We think Al Sayed is going to be, you know, our guy. President Trump has given Republicans the playbook on how to keep Michigan. It's interesting. We talk about this whole thing where there's crime and the Democrats are, I mean, the Democrats have become because they'd love to, you know, as part of the agenda to show how much they hate things, right? Oh, we low, though, it's Israel. We hate this. And they've a lot of hatred for a lot of things. But when you start breaking the law, they start to fall back in love again, and it's just kind of a weird dynamic. Well, it's not a winning message to defund the police. And yet they keep resurfacing this message. What did the DSA platform say? We want to defund the police, defund ICE, but they have to keep coming back. People want safe cities. President Trump has brought crime down to historic lows since like 1900. We're at 126 year low trace and people want this. So the socialist agenda is going to further detach them from the Democrat establishment. And the Democrat establishments are going to have to start saying, yes, we want ICE. Yes, we want police. Yeah. I'm wondering, Elizabeth Pipko, what you think about the trend here, the Democratic Socialist of America and the candidates being backed by the DSA like Al Sayed, I'm wondering what your take on this. You know, a lot of people say, oh, you was the Tea Party and they kind of they were a big thing and then they kind of fell apart and there's still parts of it still moving. What is your thought on the growing, I guess the growing popularity of the DSA? Well, look, I think they're going to continue to grow. I think we're going to see that tonight. We're going to see that next week with the primary in Wisconsin. And we're going to see it with the demise ultimately of the Democrat Party, which I think is exactly what they deserve. Considering Donald Trump warned about the socialist takeover back in 2015, long before he was ever elected to the Oval Office, he was laughed at. He was told he was wrong by several senior leaders in the Democrat Party. And like with many other things, Trace, he was proven to be 100 percent correct. But again, in our country, socialism, which is the easy way out, will always lose. There is a reason that to our capitalist society, thousands of people try to come every single year because they know that in our country, hard work and big ideas will always win a toy. Donald Trump was admired long before he was ever president and that's why socialism will always lose out to those who want to make the world a better place.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

>> [APPLAUSE]

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Now we have a bunch of lazy senators who want to threaten the filibuster and not get off their feet and talk and really represent the people and stand for what they believe in. And all the American people are asking John Thune to do is to restore the Senate to the way it used to work before Mitch McConnell's lazy filibuster ideas kind of came into play. And I think that the American people are going to be there. Here's what I think is going to happen, Dan. And I think you probably know some of this because you had a, you had a foresight into some of the things that the bureau now knows it was kept from the American public. I think Donald Trump is going to change the narrative in America. I think he's going to change some senators' minds and he's going to do it by revealing some of the things that Chris Ray and that the Chris Krebs and other major officials who were in charge of the integrity of our elections and who told us it was a perfect election in 2020, he's going to start revealing some of the intelligence that was kept from the American people. And we're going to see that our foreign adversaries have monkeyed with our system more than we knew, more than those driver's licenses coming into Chicago that you helped get all of us to understand about a few months ago about trying to sending fake driver's licenses to help Joe Biden in. There are going to be significant efforts by foreign power, some friends, some enemies that were trying to meddle in the system, and they got pretty far down that path. And I think when senators realized their state could have been targeted, when senators realized that the intention of the identities of some of their voters might have been assumed, I think there's going to be a different debate in America. I think if the president takes the time to educate people and show them that maybe the stories we got from the last leadership weren't true, I think he's going to pick off the votes and then the American people are going to put some pressure on John Thune and they're going to surgically implant a stiff back and he's going to change that filibuster for this particular thing. Make it a standing filibuster, make the Democrats talk till they drop and then we'll get a vote in the summer. But I think there's some big, significant, and very troubling revelations about the vulnerabilities of our elections that the president is about to unveil on the American public.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

here with us now is Paul Perez from the National Border Patrol Council. Great to have you here, Paul. That judge saying that the state's arguments about being punished by federal government's operation Metro surge. Well, they just don't hold. What was your take away from this? Well, I mean, for one great to see that there's no judicial activism. But again, it allows us to go in and surge as we need to. But like President Trump said, we may do a drawdown, you know, depending on what Tom Holman says. But it gives us the opportunity to make sure that our agents and officers are protected while they're fulfilling the mission of removing those people from the United States. Yeah, absolutely. Paul, this comes after the borders are Tom Holman. He went in there to Minnesota and he tried to calm the tensions here. Holman had this message for people opposing ice. And he said this. Watch the hostile rhetoric and dangerous threats and hate must stop. And we all agreed to that. All everybody meant here today. We got to stop the rhetoric, the hateful rhetoric that has caused an increase in assaults. I begged for the last two months on TV for the rhetoric to stop. I said in March if the rhetoric didn't stop, there's gonna be bloodshed and there has been. I wish I wasn't right. I want to ask you how he handled that situation. You've got tensions on both sides. Holman goes in and he wants to calm those tensions. How do you think that those elected leaders in that state are now going to approach this situation? Look, he's absolutely right. They have to tone it down. You know, President Trump does not want anybody to get hurt, whether it's the protesters, whether it's the law enforcement officers and they've got to do a reset. The rhetoric is dangerous. It has cost people their lives. It's gotten people to be arrested. It's gotten people hurt. And most of all, it's gotten our agents hurt. Not only that, you've got the agents that want to go into the jails that would make it a lot more safe. But now these agitators, they are agitators. There are some protesters, but a lot of them are agitators and they're getting in the face of ice agents. We've seen that. Sadly, with Paredi, he went and he did it multiple times. It cost him his life. But I want to get this thought here from President Trump. He was asked about this and whether or not if this continues, if they continue to get spit in their face, they get pushed these ice agents. Well, now President Trump says this is how they can respond. Watch. I said you're allowed. If somebody does that, you could do something back. You're not going to stand there and take it. If somebody spits in your face and that will not be a pleasant thing for the person that's missing, we're not letting people spit in our soul in his face as they stand in attention. And they're not allowed to do anything. We saw this play out now. Lay, we've seen this happen in Minnesota. How is this going to change the rhetoric here? President Trump wants his agents to be protected. But is this going to cause more chaos? Well, look, it just shows that President Trump has the back of law enforcement and you know, we know he's got our back. So we're going to be able to protect ourselves, protect our fellow agents. That's essentially what it comes to. Nobody should be impeding, interfering, but most importantly, assaulting a law enforcement officer. There will be consequences and we support his efforts to make sure that he puts it out there so that they know it's coming. Paul, I want to get your thoughts on this because Governor Tim Walz says that, well, he wants safety in this community as well. He met with border czar Tom Holman and they agreed that they had a productive conversation. Then he goes on NPR and but he'd already made this comment about Gestapo watch Donald Trump's modern day. Gestapo. Gestapo is scooping folks up off the streets. They're in unmarked vans wearing masks being shipped off to foreign torture dungeons. That was his comment. Then he was pressed again on NPR where they wanted him to double down or potentially walk back that statement. Here's what he had to say. Watch I've never said anything other than to be peacefully protesting and I'll stand by my words. I have to use the English language to describe what I'm seeing. So he did not walk back that Gestapo comment. What do you think he's gonna do with this? Is he is he gonna bend the knee to the Trump administration or is he gonna continue to make claims like this? I think he's too ignorant to do so. It's that exact dangerous rhetoric that has caused our agents and officers to see an increase in violent assaults. You know, when you compare an agency like ours, where the majority of our agents are Hispanic, calling us Gestapo, comparing us to Nazis, that's ignorant, that's stupid. But more importantly, it's dangerous. Yeah, absolutely. Paul, I gotta leave it there. Thank you so much for coming on. Paul Perez. Appreciate you as always.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

This is one of the many reasons that the left freaks out every time Marco Rubio speaks. - One of the things I see a lot in South Florida are people that have been in this country. They mainly came from Cuba 45 years ago. They've worked here their entire lives. They retire. They get $800, $1,000 a month in Social Security. And then they run into somebody who just got here from Cuba three months ago, 29 years old, doesn't work, and is given $1,500 a month in benefits by our government 'cause they're refugees. A year later is traveling back to Cuba 15 times. So you're a refugee fleeing oppression from a place that you now go back and visit 15 times the following year. And in the meantime, we're giving you Medicaid, food stamps, healthcare for your children, cash payments from the refugee fund. So imagine if you've been working here for 40 years and your Social Security check is smaller than the benefits going to a 28-year-old, able-bodied person who just got here. That's real. That happens. That's happening every day. That makes no sense.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

now has a margin of 118,838 votes and you're saying there's 100,000 left. If he's being literal sometimes 100,000, they're getting calls from counties and they say 20,000 it's really 22,000 it could be 33. John, can I just jump in? Yes please. Actually we asked about how do you know these numbers and actually by law they have to have it, the actual numbers. So I understand your point but I think they do have more precise numbers based on what the law requires. Interesting. That math says a shock way through the Harris campaign. That is literal even if she won them all. If there's 100,000 left and she won them all and she won't, he's 118,000. She said marginally for Harris which means probably 53, 47 or something along those lines. Interesting we'll have the decision desk talk to the people in Georgia. Can I go back to Pennsylvania for one second?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.