Popular Posts

Where do I even begin with this? So, let's start here. Nobody has done more to rebuild and save the Republican Party than Donald Trump since Abraham Lincoln himself. President Trump inherited a broken shell, a hollowed-out husk of a political party after the Bush years, after the Ryan years, after the sellout years, and he turned it into the working-class party, the middle-class party. And he took states that had been blue forever. He took the blue wall. He took states like Wisconsin, states like Ohio, states like Pennsylvania. He pulverized that blue wall. How many Senate races have we seen? Were President Trump won a state by eight points, nine points, 10 points, 11 points? And it was just enough to bring along the Republican senator by half a point or a point to build that Senate Republican majority. How many Senate candidates has he dragged along to victory? And how many rhinos has he forced out of the party to elect real, working-class, populist Republicans, people like, for example, Eric Schmidt, who represent the future of the Republican Party, where it is today? President Trump has raised more money for Republican candidates than any human in history. He has more enthusiasm and support from Republican voters than any candidate in history. I could keep going, Laura. The reality is, as he said, President Trump is dead on right here. What this comes down to is the Trump voter needs to show up in the midterm.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

So you're telling this committee that the Biden administration, while they were letting all of these unaccompanied minors into the country, and as we've talked about today, they weren't keeping track of them. They issued these kids a hotline that they could call if they had trouble with the sponsor family that they were put with. And you're saying that 65,000 calls to this hotline designated to protect these kids went unanswered? Is that what you're telling this committee? Yes, sir. Wow. That is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Do you know how many staffers the administration assigned to answering these phones and helping these kids? One. One staffer? Any idea how many hours a day this staffer was working? No. Maybe that's why there were 65,000 calls that weren't answered from these little kids, huh?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

- If these ballots were run through multiple times, as you've alleged, I think you said possibly up to 30,000 times, definitely thousands of times, being counted, when we examine the poll book and see who voted, and we count those numbers, would they then not line up with the total number of votes coming out of Detroit? - Just later, later, the poll book is completely off, completely off. - Off to 30,000? - I'd say that poll book is off by over 100,000. - Where are you from? - Oh, I'm from down river. - Okay. - I'm here because of the 38,000 ballots that arrived here at 3.45 AM, they're just now sitting over there and getting counted, supposedly. - Okay, okay. - And that's why I arrived. - Okay. - To an eye-opening of hypocrisy, let me tell you, something I want you to see, they're taping up the windows, the security's taping up the windows so that people who are challenging cannot see in here, and he can't see out, so it's an interesting development. Interesting development. - I began observing the process of ballots at several counting boards. I quickly noticed that none, and I mean none, of the names who were being scanned from the ballots were in the electronic poll books. All of the names that were found were found in the supplemental sheets. We know that the poll books, the electronic poll books, were updated on Sunday, November 1st. That meant that all of these new ballots had to have been brand new registered voters on Monday, November 2nd, or Tuesday, November 3rd. I found it very hard to believe that tens of thousands of people had registered in just two short days, so I began writing down the names on the ballots immediately after they were scanned by the computer poll worker. As soon as I began, I was severely obstructed by five different persons that I could no longer, such that I could no longer continue my legal responsibility as a poll challenger. These five persons comprised of a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredential person, a Democrat challenger, and one of the top leaders of the AVCB. The details can be found on my affidavit. Does anyone believe that 30 or 40,000 new voters were actually signed up legally in two days? - Yeah, and what have you seen? - I've seen ballots that don't belong to anybody. They don't throw up in the voter registration. There's no name attached to them. - And what are they doing with those ballots? - I'm challenging them, and they're supposed to put them in a box to be evaluated, but then multiple ballots that have several different numbers, one person with different numbers. We have whole lists of them. We're writing everything down all day long. - So are they improperly filled out, and you're looking to disqualify them? - Yes, they're improperly filled out if they have no name, if they don't have a home, or if the person was born in 1921, but registered to vote in 1900, that kind of doesn't make sense. - But that's not on the ballot. When you vote, your ballot is just the balls in which you have on there. What are you seeing? Are you seeing people's registration forms? So on the tables, you have the ballot, and then you are able to see next to them on a computer screen whose ballot that is. - Sometimes the ballot itself has no name, but the ballot is filled out. And then if we go into the registration file, we find the person that was born in 1921, and there's a lot that's not right. - What's wrong with being born in 1921? - But registering to vote in 1900, 21 years before you're born. - Only a few of the most egregious items witnessed. I was not allowed to perform my job, and from what I observed were any of the GOP challengers in accordance with Michigan laws. We were constantly prevented from getting close enough to see what was going on with respect to the ballots. Procedures were not being properly followed when we brought these to the attention of the supervisors. Our concerns were dismissed and ignored. We observed ballots being backdated from 11-4 to 11-2, and data being entered into the computers for these mail-in ballots. Poll workers were entering ballot information from new mail-in ballots, including dates of birth of 1/1/1900 into the electronic poll books and processing those ballots for tabulation. The information wasn't in either the electronic poll book or the paper supplement book prior to that. Dead people were voting. I sent a website to that effect, and the list that they had up to that date was 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the 2020 election, check for yourself, and has also been found in one or more of the obituaries online. This is the most important election in my lifetime, and I think the most important election in the history of our republic. - Yeah, poll book, why don't you look at the registered voters on there? How many registered voters are on there? Did you, do you even know the answer to that? - No, I guess I'm trying to get to the bottom of this here. - Zero, zero, there's zero. - So my question then is if the-- - Guess how many, wait, what about the turnout rate? 120%. - Let's let Representative Johnson ask his question a little bit.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

We don't have to create opposition. There is opposition. We need to seize the opportunity, and we need to see the opportunity. And by that I mean that our CIA, along with the Israeli Mossad, make determinations about the best way to determine who to train and arm. Well, at the same time, we continue the economic stranglehold, and our military, along with our allies the Israelis, provide coordinated support with targeted and supportive attacks on the IRGC and the Basij paramilitary police. That's, in my view, how you do it. Well, Mark, you never served in the military. I know history. I know history. Nobody alive ever served in the Civil War either. Nobody alive ever served in the Revolutionary War either. That's not the point. You do leave it to the experts to figure this out. But the President of the United States, the Commander-in-Chief, he makes the decisions. And I look at history. I look at success. Success in destroying the Soviet Union. Success in pushing communism out of Central and South America. And we did this. Success in pushing communism out of parts of Africa. Success in pushing the Russians, the Soviets, out of Afghanistan. We didn't send in troops. We armed the freedom fighters. The Mujahideen in Afghanistan and others throughout the world. Why would we take this off the table? If the Kurds stole weapons, and the Kurds have been great allies of ours, everywhere around the Middle East, they are patriotic, they are pro-American. There are other ways to do this. The question is whether our CIA is up to the task. I hope it is. I don't know anything about the bureaucracy over there. I remember William Casey, the director of the CIA under Reagan. That man was fearless. It's something to think about quite seriously. This is how we've dealt with it in the past. Obviously, Iran is not Afghanistan. It's not Angola. It's not Nicaraguan and so forth. But as I see it, as we have all seen, the Iranian people have been more than willing than any other people to die for their liberation. They want liberation. And I bet they want retribution against this regime for slaughtering tens of thousands of their family members and raping and torturing their young women, their daughters, their sisters, their wives and their mothers by the tens of thousands. They just need an opportunity. They can't do it with their bare hands. But the point is this. The only certain way to ensure that the Iranian regime can never and will never spread its revolution here, in the Middle East, in Europe or anywhere else, and all that evil and horror that goes with it, involves its elimination. No matter what President Trump does, he will be attacked by the Democrats, the media, the isolationists for his heroic actions against the Iranian regime. So I would ignore the Democrats and the media and the isolationists. They want failure. They will define success for them as our failure as a nation, because they are driven by a deranged mentality about politics and exploitation for power. They are fundamentally power-hungry. We've come so far. We've made such incredible progress. Victory is in sight, in my view. There's a gentleman by the name of E. Frankfurt. He's an expert in counterterrorism on Iran and Middle East, based in Washington. And he writes the following in the Jerusalem Post. "Moments in which internal crisis and external pressure converge at this level," he's talking about Iran, "are rare, and history suggests they don't remain open indefinitely. Previous opportunities for fundamental change were constrained by hesitation, particularly at the level of international coordination, and those constraints carried consequences. The current moment presents a similar test, but with higher stakes and less margin for delay. If the regime survives," he writes, "the ideology that defines the system will remain intact, along with its patterns of behavior, as a threat that cannot be managed indefinitely. Systems defined by this level of ideological rigidity and expansionism do not evolve into moderation. They persist until they are forced to change or cease to exist. The removal of this structure would not only address an immediate security challenge, but would also open the possibility for a different relationship between Iran and the region, one that aligns with the emerging framework established by the Abraham Accords." Now, to be clear, I don't have access to all the information the president has or the military and intelligence experts, but I know what I know. And I know the president of the United States, President Trump, always has the best interests of the American people at front of mind. And that will be his guiding motivation. And frankly, I could not be prouder of our president, his team, and our military. I could not be prouder of all of them. My unsolicited advice, just as a commentator, somebody who studies history, stay the course. Stay the course. But thank you to all those who brought us to this point, where frankly nobody thought we would ever be, thanks to our president, our military, and the people around him.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

I've got to ask you about the U.S. election. As you point out, you're not an American citizen. You're an Australian. You're clearly not rooting for Hillary, but are you rooting for Trump? No. If we have good information on Trump, we publish that. If we have good information on Hillary and Democrats, we publish that. It is a bit concerning the allegations that by the Clinton campaign that everyone is a Russian agent are really disturbing. Why is that? Well, because bizarrely Hillary Clinton, the Democrat, has become, as positioned herself now, to be the security candidate. She's powered up with the neo-cons responsible for the Iraq war, and she's grabbed on to this kind of neo-McCarthy hysteria about Russia and is using that to demonize the Trump campaign. The Trump campaign has all sorts of things wrong with it. But as far as we can see, being Russian agents is not one of them. You know, some people have asked us, "When will you release information on Donald Trump?" And of course, we are very interested in all countries to reveal the truth about the candidates that they can understand. But actually, it's really hard for us to release anything worse than what comes out of Donald Trump's mouth every second day. I mean, it's part of his charismatic appeal that he speaks off the cuff. People should not be afraid of their governments. Government should be afraid of their people. The American populace is facing an unconventional warfare scenario. This is information warfare.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Donald Trump is the only one helping these people in Iran. So, Elizabeth Banks, this woman, Bita, is about to be gang-raped and publicly executed, and so are three more women, and they have been doing this to many young people every single day, one or two public executions. So, you're sitting there on your cushy couch talking about Kamala Harris. You claim to be a feminist, you claim to be a humanitarian. Where are you when the women need you? You're a fake, you're a hypocrite, you have no help to anyone. So, if you claim to be a feminist, you claim to be a humanitarian, you claim to be a good person, America, Iran isn't just a military war or peace in the Middle East or oil stabilization. This is a humanitarian issue. They are killing young people every single day. And the only president, the only one that has helped is President Trump.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

>> You know, the president had a nice life before this and he chooses to get up every day and do this. I love that he did this interview with you. I love that even at the end of his trip in California, he's taking questions from the press all the time. Look, he's a special guy. And so my message tonight after watching that interview where you see the president get so granular on every issue and you hear that from people who sit down with him. They walk away and they go, he is so granular knowledge on every issue you put in front of him. My message is Republican Congress, Republican establishment, you have a very special guy. You're not gonna get another president like this. So get it together. >> Katie. >> Well, I opened four Trump accounts for my four children and they're all doing excellent, which is indicative of a great economy, oil's down. President Trump's right. We need to give things time to tick out, but I am grateful to be under President Trump. >> Yeah, and Elizabeth Pipko, your final thoughts on this? >> Look, Trace, the president as always is right about everything, including you having one of the best shows on TV. I hope everyone that was watching tonight realized how lucky we are to have President Trump in the Oval Office. And to know again on the background of these day at DSA victories, what it means to have those that want to really steal from our future American children the opportunities that America presents them versus a president like Donald Trump who wants to instead invest in the futures of American children.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

The CIA knew Hillary started the Russia collusion story and then went in and told Barack Obama all about it, that she was trying to link Trump with Russia to distract from her email scandal. Hillary Clinton's role in creating the Russia hoax, one declassified email exposes how she orchestrated the entire plot. Former House Freedom Caucus chair and Trump's former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows joined us last night to detail how Clinton's campaign is working with the Deep State. The CNN article from 2022, okay, it says Hillary Clinton personally approved plan to share Trump Russia allegation with the press in 2016 campaign manager says. So this is not some right wing conspiracy. This is not some Republican talking points. This is a CNN article from three years ago. So I think I wouldn't be surprised if she could be indicted and finally have to answer some of these questions about this Russia collusion narrative and this dossier. This idea that the Hillary Clinton campaign spent some $10 million to generate this fictitious documentation that they could then use to change an election, thank goodness it didn't work though. The documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. He quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, quote, it will be a long term affair and to demonize Putin and Trump and adds that quote, later the FBI will put more oil into the fire, unquote. Other emails reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference and that was a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. These documents provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to acknowledging that the info they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. Despite this, the Obama intel community forged ahead with their 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election. A bombshell revelation that then CIA director John Brennan briefed President Obama in 2016 on a reported plan by the Clinton campaign to link Russian interference with the Trump campaign. I would firstly address the DNC data that was posted by WikiLeaks and that clearly showed evidence of a property called a file fat format file that's the file allocation table format meaning every time it's it's reading it's a program and software used to read data to a storage device, either a thumb drive or CD ROM, something like that. And as it does that, it changes the last modified time on each file to the nearest even second. Okay, it's just a function of that program. So when that occurs, all those times the last modified are changed on all the files. So when we looked at all the DNC emails from 23rd, 24th and 25th of May, all of them ended in even numbers. So and that was 500 probably a little more than that I didn't count also. But it that means that the random chance of that occurring would be one chance and two to the 500 power, in other words, one chance in a one followed by over 150 zeros. Meaning it's obviously that was a factor that proved that that program was used to do that in the program that does it is fat file allocation table formatting. So that that says that that data was downloaded to a physical device, either thumb drivers CD ROM, and then transported physically before WikiLeaks could publish it or put it on the web. So that that said to us that it wasn't it wasn't a hack from Russia. It was an inside job or somebody close in that downloaded the data to the to the to a storage device and then took it physically of DNC staffer Seth Rich, who was murdered last summer, a federal investigator telling Fox News that an FBI forensic report of riches computer showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through a former reporter and London based WikiLeaks director, Gavin McFadden. The investigator told Fox News Rich provided McFadden with more than 44,000 emails, nearly 18,000 attachments. Rich was murdered near his DC home on the morning of July 10. But his wallet, his cell phone, his watch not taken from a 2016 White House briefing by Brennan state that Clinton allegedly approved, quote, a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up scandal, claiming interference by the Russian security service. Handwritten notes list POTUS among those at the meeting. Former federal prosecutor John O'Connor told CBN News his global lane program. It proves it was the Clinton campaign, not the Trump team that worked with Russia to influence the election. And that's the irony of it, that we've spent three or four years talking about how Trump supposedly colluded with Russia, where it was all a complete hoax. It's exactly the opposite is true, and it's very profound. Critics of the Mueller investigation are pouncing on the revelations as evidence that it all amounts to massive abuse of power and potential criminal activity by the nation's intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Many are asking what then Vice President Joe Biden knew. The person in the campaign responsible for that is Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. Barack Obama knew about it as early as the summer of 2016. I think it's safe to say that Joe Biden knew about it as well. Dean Irakloff has also declassified a CIA memo that notes the Russians believed Hillary Clinton tried to stir up the scandal to distract the public from her use of a public email server. Well, what else did we find out from Durham? Well, we found out the FBI shut down two investigations into the Clintons. Two, first, three separate FBI field offices said, wait a second, the Clinton Foundation is a foreign money laundering scam. We should probably look into it. But Andy McCabe, you remember Andy, the guy married to the Clinton donor, he calls everybody in and says, guys, the Clinton Foundation is off limits. Second thing they shut down. The Hillary Clinton campaign was taking illegal contributions from overseas. FBI informants caught Hillary's campaign saying, yeah, we'll take your money. We don't care. Albania, Morocco, just send us the checks. So he runs it up the flagpole at the FBI headquarters and they said, shut it down. No investigation into Hillary Clinton's foreign campaign donors. We're not going to go there. We have to frame Trump as a traitor instead. So John Durham also found a few other funny little nuggets that squeaky clean James Comey couldn't wait to spy on the Trump campaign. He kept asking his underlings, have we started spying yet? Have we started spying yet? When could we start spying on Trump? Are the phones tapped yet? What a sicko. Also Comey's people told his people, don't put anything in writing. They're only going to get us in trouble. So the media loves to say, well, you know, this is just the FBI. This is just the Department of Justice. What they never tell you is this is the Obama administration preventing investigations into Hillary and greenlighting fake and illegal investigations into Donald Trump. But Barack Obama gets out there and he lies to us about the whole thing. I can guarantee that not because I give Attorney General Lynch a directive, that is institutionally how we have always operated. I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line and always have maintained it. I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case. So Barack Obama gets briefed by the CIA director with the FBI director on pending investigations into his political opponents. And then he just tells Fox, no, just lies to Fox. Don't you ever lie to Fox again. So in one week, Barack Obama's vice president was taking foreign bribes right under his nose and his Justice Department was illegally spying on the Republican presidential nominee and shutting down investigations, legitimate investigations into the Democratic presidential nominee. Mr. No scandals in my administration. And the meeting was colluding with the Clinton campaign on how to lay out the smears. Durham says the New York Times was having meetings with the Clinton campaign. Hey, Hillary, how does this draft look to you? Does this look all right to you? And Hillary's campaign was like, yeah, that looks good. You might want to add something signing off on it. Remember, the New York Times got polluters for this. So they get awards for fake stories and Hannity gets nothing for telling the truth. He doesn't get like a plaque or anything. And not only that, the Biden administration obstructed the Durham report. A bunch of FBI agents loyal to Joe Biden and Hillary and Barack refused to cooperate with Durham. They wouldn't even sit down with them. They're still hiding stuff from us, still obstructing justice. I thought you could get impeached for obstructing justice. Now the FBI is interfering with American elections and they're obstructing investigations into their actions about the election interference. Now I don't even know now who's worse, the CIA or the FBI. Everybody knows this thing's rigged. We're all busy investigating the investigators while Democrats are winning elections. We're out here waiting four years on a report. Meanwhile, the FBI and the CIA are meddling with our voting rights. They frame a guy as a Russian agent, Obama's in on it, the CIA's in on it, the FBI's in on it. Hillary starts it. They illegally spy on his campaign, fabricate evidence to get warrants. And then they do a two year investigation to cover up their crime and try to impeach them. But the worst part is this, they run it back in 2020 with the laptop. Same thing, CIA and FBI, even CNN says this is bad. Regardless, the report is now here. It has dropped and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans vote for. It is regardless, devastating to the FBI and to a degree, it does exonerate Donald Trump. Durham had a huge investigation that took many months. What we're starting to see is the coordination that happened between the Clinton campaign, between those in the three letter agencies that we're all too familiar with. But I think the troubling thing that appears to be coming out is that over and over and over again, there was real pressure at the very top levels of these agencies to have a narrative out there that we knew was false. And Trump's Justice Department says this was all by design. How can you trust the government when they do this kind of thing? And they're charging Trump with that. He's had nothing but merciless attacks year after year. This whole thing about FISA warrants, the whole thing about Russia collusion, the whole thing about attacks and the Mueller report and the impeachment, the whole thing was set up by Hillary Clinton and an attempt to discredit him and to keep him from being elected. You've got those emails back and forth with Strzok and Page about how can we use the FBI to destroy him to keep him from getting elected. I mean, this kind of, they need to go to jail. I mean, that is bad stuff.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

[MUSIC PLAYING] We just wrapped up the pit stop. First ever pit stop here at the White House. What an incredible experience. And this is all to celebrate America's 250th. We can't wait to see you on August 23. What do we have to wait for, David? This was just a little taste of the pit stop that we're going to have in a race scenario. We're all going to be pushing the limits, everything you can. It's going to be beautiful chaos is how I would explain it. Goosebumps, it's everything you're going to want to be. It's the best way to celebrate America's 250th. So make sure you're there. [MUSIC PLAYING]

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Iran walked right put their head right into a noose. They said we're going to shut down the strait of our moves and only us only us Can determine who gets in and who gets out and they have to be pro Iranian and we're not going to let golf states sell oil Ha ha ha we're going to everybody said all that was brilliant the left went crazy. He was delighted Oh my gosh, the Pentagon was caught Unprepared the Pentagon had been preparing that for 50 years Wanda Reagan they opened it. They know how to do it. So all that Trump said is that's a good idea shut down the straight and Let in the good guys and stop the bad guys, but your bad guys are our good guys and You're good guys are our bad guys So we're gonna take a page out of your book and we're not gonna let in anybody anywhere near Iran and We're gonna let in everybody else and the difference between the strategies not just that we flipped it But you have no wherewithal PT boats and a bunch of mines won't stop us But we have a huge fleet and that will stop you from stopping us And if you decide that you want to send the remnants of your missiles into the Gulf or Israel or at our fleet Go ahead because we haven't even decided to you hit dual use targets yet We're not like Barack Obama in Libya and taking out television stations and ports We're not like Bill Clinton and Serbia that destroyed every bridge on the Danube and took out their grid of a million and a half people We're not Harry Truman have destroyed all the hydroelectric plants in North Korea. We let you off easy Well, it doesn't mean there's not an American tradition of hitting dual use targets so we're gonna hit your electrical and put you in darkness and We're gonna hit car guy gun or take it Will you take the oil and rob it from you or take and what was the result of all that in the last 48 hours? Ships are coming in that we let and ships are not coming in that we don't let and people Economists at the major research Universities in Europe the United States have now flipped on a dime and they're actually looking in empirical fashion at last At what this means and the ranges are absolutely stunning 400 million dollars and more per day lost Economically to Iran whether that's lack of oil sales or petrochemical sales or lack of key imported imported mechanical goods electrical goods that keep their Infrastructure running or food. They're in dire straits they're losing all of their income from the straight of our moves and they're losing all of their income from the Prochemical and oil and they were broke to begin with and they can't do anything about it because Trump did it sequentially Military first chance of negotiation second put the boot on the neck third So what is going to happen now? You don't see two things two things possibly three they may decide they want to go down and a blaze of glory and Empty their arsenal of remnant ballistic missiles and drones if they do that They will be in darkness And they will have no oil for the next ten years So that we'll see if there's saner heads among them number two they have a choice to Agreed in negotiations and this time they're not going to have every click saying 15 here and 10 demands here No, no, they're just going to have 10 and if they don't abide by them the United States can force them to abide by them or they can just simply give up Give up no demands. Nothing. Just say we're done and they're going to have a run What I meant by give up is the regime gives up I don't know if it's going to be immediate, but the people take over all of those are favorable Results for us and so to conclude I don't think that's a very wise thing every 24 hours to be sit glued to your computer or the television and whatever a pundit on the left or a democratic senator says or distant Disgruntled person on the right says then take that as gospel and not look at the data not look at the evidence It's out there to examine both as I said empirically or historically because if you did do that You could see there was very very little chance of winning. There's only one last caveat Iran is ruined militarily and it's going to be ruined Economically if it doesn't give in and they're they're now going to negotiate on a different at it with a different attitude if you believe that they will abide by a Demand that we've given them no nuclear material for 20 years, whatever it is then you have to believe that They will never break their word I don't think they've ever kept their word and number two that there will be a president someday like Kamala Harris Gavin Newsom Pete Buttigieg Cory Booker and people of that caliber and Mindset would enforce every one of those negotiable those negotiated demands and I don't think They will ever tell the truth or honor any of their commitments And I don't think that the next left-wing or democratic president would ever force them to which means We better get them to surrender Unconditionally or face economic rule and ruin which will usher in a regime change. Thank you very much

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.