Popular Posts

"This has been by far the most successful first year of any administration in the history of our country, acknowledged by everybody. To begin with, I ended eight wars, and it may be a little early to say this, but if we add Iran and Lebanon, that will be ten wars ended and many, many millions of lives saved. Every lives we've saved. Starting on day one, we ended the illegal invasion of America. That's an invasion by criminals, many, many criminals, murderers, drug dealers, prisoners. They emptied out their prisons into our country. And we took the most dangerous, unsafe, violent and open border and created the most secure border in U.S. history, one of the most secure borders anywhere in the world, with zero illegal aliens coming into our country in the past 11 months, zero. And in 2025, we achieved the largest drop in violent crime ever recorded. That's despite all of these people that came into our country. Many of them are now gone, I'm pleased to tell you. The murder rate, isn't it a terrible thing to be talking about murder, but you got to say it. At least if it's good news. I guess it's good news. But the murder rate reached the lowest level in over 125 years, 1900, the year 1900. Before my father was born, my father was great, before he was born, the flow of deadly fentanyl pouring across our border is down by astounding 59 percent. And as you probably noticed, if you watch the news, illegal drugs coming in by ocean or sea are down by 97 percent. And we're trying to find out who the three percent is because I consider them to be perhaps the bravest people anywhere in the world. Or they don't watch television or something. We passed the largest tax cuts in American history, the largest spending cuts in American history, the largest regulation cuts in American history, and the largest investment in border security in the history of our country. And starting my first day in office, we banned the transgender mutilization of our children. And we made it the official policy of the United States of America that there are only two genders, male and female. That was easy. Could you imagine if I was up here 20 years ago or 15 years ago, probably 12 years ago, and I said there are only two genders, male and female, people would say, what the hell is he saying that for? Is he crazy? That's got to be the worst speech I've ever heard. Why is he saying that? Or why is he saying that we got men out of women's sports? Can you imagine saying that 15 years ago, 15 years ago, you said, and we got men out of women's sports. The audience would say, what's wrong with that guy? It's the craziest thing I've ever heard. And we got critical race theory out of our schools. And we abolished DEI across the entire federal government. And we eliminated so-called affirmative action in federal contracting and university admissions. If you get great marks and have great scores and your boards are good, everything is good, you're getting in. People can't go before. We have a country now that again is based on merit. That's the way we became great.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Okay, so month over month we came down four tenths of a percent, so negative read on the headline month to month. We were looking for one tenths of a percent to the downside, we got four tenths to the downside. All right, year over year, listen to this, 3.5 percent. The street was looking for a gain of 3.8 percent. We got 3.5 percent and last month's read was 4.2, so look at that decline there. Okay, core month over month CPI flat, zero. The street was looking for a gain of two tenths of a percent. And then also core year over year, all of this better than expected, 2.6 percent is the core number. We were looking for 2.8 percent. That is also a nice decline from last month.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

>> We are looking right now at the GDP number at 4.3% is the actual number versus an estimate of 3.3%, Mark Tepper, your reaction. >> So last week we talked about inflation coming in lower than expected. Now economic growth is one full percentage point faster than expected. It was supposed to come in at 3.3, came in at 4.3. This is a direct result of everything President Trump has put in place. Net exports are on the rise because of Trump's tariff policy, which is leveling the trade playing field, AI's increasing productivity, businesses are investing and spending, and the consumer remains strong and just think next, I think, well, next quarter, they'll end up getting an extra $150 billion in refund checks that they can then deploy and spend as well. So great number. >> Great number, 4.3%. And I've got to say, when I see a GDP of 4.3%, I have to believe 5% is not far away and that of course is what Louis Navalier told us last week, Mark, that we're gonna see a 5% GDP handle in the first half of the year. >> He looks like Nostradamus right now. I mean, he almost predicted that on the head. Obviously 5% is well within our reach, especially given the consumer tailwinds I just mentioned.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Where do I even begin with this? So, let's start here. Nobody has done more to rebuild and save the Republican Party than Donald Trump since Abraham Lincoln himself. President Trump inherited a broken shell, a hollowed-out husk of a political party after the Bush years, after the Ryan years, after the sellout years, and he turned it into the working-class party, the middle-class party. And he took states that had been blue forever. He took the blue wall. He took states like Wisconsin, states like Ohio, states like Pennsylvania. He pulverized that blue wall. How many Senate races have we seen? Were President Trump won a state by eight points, nine points, 10 points, 11 points? And it was just enough to bring along the Republican senator by half a point or a point to build that Senate Republican majority. How many Senate candidates has he dragged along to victory? And how many rhinos has he forced out of the party to elect real, working-class, populist Republicans, people like, for example, Eric Schmidt, who represent the future of the Republican Party, where it is today? President Trump has raised more money for Republican candidates than any human in history. He has more enthusiasm and support from Republican voters than any candidate in history. I could keep going, Laura. The reality is, as he said, President Trump is dead on right here. What this comes down to is the Trump voter needs to show up in the midterm.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

So you're telling this committee that the Biden administration, while they were letting all of these unaccompanied minors into the country, and as we've talked about today, they weren't keeping track of them. They issued these kids a hotline that they could call if they had trouble with the sponsor family that they were put with. And you're saying that 65,000 calls to this hotline designated to protect these kids went unanswered? Is that what you're telling this committee? Yes, sir. Wow. That is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Do you know how many staffers the administration assigned to answering these phones and helping these kids? One. One staffer? Any idea how many hours a day this staffer was working? No. Maybe that's why there were 65,000 calls that weren't answered from these little kids, huh?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

- If these ballots were run through multiple times, as you've alleged, I think you said possibly up to 30,000 times, definitely thousands of times, being counted, when we examine the poll book and see who voted, and we count those numbers, would they then not line up with the total number of votes coming out of Detroit? - Just later, later, the poll book is completely off, completely off. - Off to 30,000? - I'd say that poll book is off by over 100,000. - Where are you from? - Oh, I'm from down river. - Okay. - I'm here because of the 38,000 ballots that arrived here at 3.45 AM, they're just now sitting over there and getting counted, supposedly. - Okay, okay. - And that's why I arrived. - Okay. - To an eye-opening of hypocrisy, let me tell you, something I want you to see, they're taping up the windows, the security's taping up the windows so that people who are challenging cannot see in here, and he can't see out, so it's an interesting development. Interesting development. - I began observing the process of ballots at several counting boards. I quickly noticed that none, and I mean none, of the names who were being scanned from the ballots were in the electronic poll books. All of the names that were found were found in the supplemental sheets. We know that the poll books, the electronic poll books, were updated on Sunday, November 1st. That meant that all of these new ballots had to have been brand new registered voters on Monday, November 2nd, or Tuesday, November 3rd. I found it very hard to believe that tens of thousands of people had registered in just two short days, so I began writing down the names on the ballots immediately after they were scanned by the computer poll worker. As soon as I began, I was severely obstructed by five different persons that I could no longer, such that I could no longer continue my legal responsibility as a poll challenger. These five persons comprised of a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredential person, a Democrat challenger, and one of the top leaders of the AVCB. The details can be found on my affidavit. Does anyone believe that 30 or 40,000 new voters were actually signed up legally in two days? - Yeah, and what have you seen? - I've seen ballots that don't belong to anybody. They don't throw up in the voter registration. There's no name attached to them. - And what are they doing with those ballots? - I'm challenging them, and they're supposed to put them in a box to be evaluated, but then multiple ballots that have several different numbers, one person with different numbers. We have whole lists of them. We're writing everything down all day long. - So are they improperly filled out, and you're looking to disqualify them? - Yes, they're improperly filled out if they have no name, if they don't have a home, or if the person was born in 1921, but registered to vote in 1900, that kind of doesn't make sense. - But that's not on the ballot. When you vote, your ballot is just the balls in which you have on there. What are you seeing? Are you seeing people's registration forms? So on the tables, you have the ballot, and then you are able to see next to them on a computer screen whose ballot that is. - Sometimes the ballot itself has no name, but the ballot is filled out. And then if we go into the registration file, we find the person that was born in 1921, and there's a lot that's not right. - What's wrong with being born in 1921? - But registering to vote in 1900, 21 years before you're born. - Only a few of the most egregious items witnessed. I was not allowed to perform my job, and from what I observed were any of the GOP challengers in accordance with Michigan laws. We were constantly prevented from getting close enough to see what was going on with respect to the ballots. Procedures were not being properly followed when we brought these to the attention of the supervisors. Our concerns were dismissed and ignored. We observed ballots being backdated from 11-4 to 11-2, and data being entered into the computers for these mail-in ballots. Poll workers were entering ballot information from new mail-in ballots, including dates of birth of 1/1/1900 into the electronic poll books and processing those ballots for tabulation. The information wasn't in either the electronic poll book or the paper supplement book prior to that. Dead people were voting. I sent a website to that effect, and the list that they had up to that date was 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the 2020 election, check for yourself, and has also been found in one or more of the obituaries online. This is the most important election in my lifetime, and I think the most important election in the history of our republic. - Yeah, poll book, why don't you look at the registered voters on there? How many registered voters are on there? Did you, do you even know the answer to that? - No, I guess I'm trying to get to the bottom of this here. - Zero, zero, there's zero. - So my question then is if the-- - Guess how many, wait, what about the turnout rate? 120%. - Let's let Representative Johnson ask his question a little bit.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

All right, let's start with this, a federal judge, again, blocking the postal service from implementing President Trump's mail ballot rule ahead of the midterms. Case could be appealed back to the Supreme Court. Of course, earlier this week the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump's effort to try to clean up the voter rolls was valid by using the post office to make sure that ballots are only delivered to actual voters who should be voting. Yeah, so this is basically a tracking system. Every company like FedEx and Amazon use these, and it's just a way of making sure that the person who's sending in the ballot is actually the voter because we know there's widespread fraud with, we know hundreds and hundreds and thousands of people are cheating, and the Democrats don't want it. They don't want to stop the fraud. Yeah, no, it is kind of amazing because I remember just a year or so ago, or a few years ago before COVID, Democrats, one thing that they could all agree upon was that the problem with mass mail-in balloting is that you have no control over who gets the ballots, you have no control over ballot custody. It was agreed that it was too dangerous because it's too fraught for corruption, but now it's become part of the Democrat strategy, apparently. Of course, and by the way, as you know, we just had new evidence that came in that hundreds and thousands of people across the country are cheating on this, and the Democrats don't want to stop it. Okay, next up, it is the year 2026, and Democrat politicians are still tearing down statues Democrats in Virginia, led by Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger, who is the most unpopular Virginia governor in the history of polling, quietly took down the statue of a Civil War doctor, Hunter McGuire, from the grounds of state capital and Richmond. And what I think is so interesting about this abomination and attack on history is that Hunter McGuire was famous for being a Civil War doctor who revolutionized the way doctors and nurses are treated in wartime, protecting them so that they can do their jobs, helping people who are wounded on the battlefield. And his ideas later became the foundation of the Geneva Convention rules governing how medics and nurses are treated on the battlefield, yet Virginia politicians led by Abigail Spanberger tore down his statue because of their hurt feelings. He's a hero. This guy's a hero who has saved lives, potentially hundreds and hundreds of thousands of lives, relieve pain and suffering on the battlefield. And he deserves a medal. He deserves a statue. I'm proud as a person who's lived in Virginia that he was a Virginian, and yet because he has some connection with the Confederacy, they want to take it down. I mean, look, you know this. You lived in Virginia. They want to take out Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, anyone who is associated with our founding.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

We don't have to create opposition. There is opposition. We need to seize the opportunity, and we need to see the opportunity. And by that I mean that our CIA, along with the Israeli Mossad, make determinations about the best way to determine who to train and arm. Well, at the same time, we continue the economic stranglehold, and our military, along with our allies the Israelis, provide coordinated support with targeted and supportive attacks on the IRGC and the Basij paramilitary police. That's, in my view, how you do it. Well, Mark, you never served in the military. I know history. I know history. Nobody alive ever served in the Civil War either. Nobody alive ever served in the Revolutionary War either. That's not the point. You do leave it to the experts to figure this out. But the President of the United States, the Commander-in-Chief, he makes the decisions. And I look at history. I look at success. Success in destroying the Soviet Union. Success in pushing communism out of Central and South America. And we did this. Success in pushing communism out of parts of Africa. Success in pushing the Russians, the Soviets, out of Afghanistan. We didn't send in troops. We armed the freedom fighters. The Mujahideen in Afghanistan and others throughout the world. Why would we take this off the table? If the Kurds stole weapons, and the Kurds have been great allies of ours, everywhere around the Middle East, they are patriotic, they are pro-American. There are other ways to do this. The question is whether our CIA is up to the task. I hope it is. I don't know anything about the bureaucracy over there. I remember William Casey, the director of the CIA under Reagan. That man was fearless. It's something to think about quite seriously. This is how we've dealt with it in the past. Obviously, Iran is not Afghanistan. It's not Angola. It's not Nicaraguan and so forth. But as I see it, as we have all seen, the Iranian people have been more than willing than any other people to die for their liberation. They want liberation. And I bet they want retribution against this regime for slaughtering tens of thousands of their family members and raping and torturing their young women, their daughters, their sisters, their wives and their mothers by the tens of thousands. They just need an opportunity. They can't do it with their bare hands. But the point is this. The only certain way to ensure that the Iranian regime can never and will never spread its revolution here, in the Middle East, in Europe or anywhere else, and all that evil and horror that goes with it, involves its elimination. No matter what President Trump does, he will be attacked by the Democrats, the media, the isolationists for his heroic actions against the Iranian regime. So I would ignore the Democrats and the media and the isolationists. They want failure. They will define success for them as our failure as a nation, because they are driven by a deranged mentality about politics and exploitation for power. They are fundamentally power-hungry. We've come so far. We've made such incredible progress. Victory is in sight, in my view. There's a gentleman by the name of E. Frankfurt. He's an expert in counterterrorism on Iran and Middle East, based in Washington. And he writes the following in the Jerusalem Post. "Moments in which internal crisis and external pressure converge at this level," he's talking about Iran, "are rare, and history suggests they don't remain open indefinitely. Previous opportunities for fundamental change were constrained by hesitation, particularly at the level of international coordination, and those constraints carried consequences. The current moment presents a similar test, but with higher stakes and less margin for delay. If the regime survives," he writes, "the ideology that defines the system will remain intact, along with its patterns of behavior, as a threat that cannot be managed indefinitely. Systems defined by this level of ideological rigidity and expansionism do not evolve into moderation. They persist until they are forced to change or cease to exist. The removal of this structure would not only address an immediate security challenge, but would also open the possibility for a different relationship between Iran and the region, one that aligns with the emerging framework established by the Abraham Accords." Now, to be clear, I don't have access to all the information the president has or the military and intelligence experts, but I know what I know. And I know the president of the United States, President Trump, always has the best interests of the American people at front of mind. And that will be his guiding motivation. And frankly, I could not be prouder of our president, his team, and our military. I could not be prouder of all of them. My unsolicited advice, just as a commentator, somebody who studies history, stay the course. Stay the course. But thank you to all those who brought us to this point, where frankly nobody thought we would ever be, thanks to our president, our military, and the people around him.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

I've got to ask you about the U.S. election. As you point out, you're not an American citizen. You're an Australian. You're clearly not rooting for Hillary, but are you rooting for Trump? No. If we have good information on Trump, we publish that. If we have good information on Hillary and Democrats, we publish that. It is a bit concerning the allegations that by the Clinton campaign that everyone is a Russian agent are really disturbing. Why is that? Well, because bizarrely Hillary Clinton, the Democrat, has become, as positioned herself now, to be the security candidate. She's powered up with the neo-cons responsible for the Iraq war, and she's grabbed on to this kind of neo-McCarthy hysteria about Russia and is using that to demonize the Trump campaign. The Trump campaign has all sorts of things wrong with it. But as far as we can see, being Russian agents is not one of them. You know, some people have asked us, "When will you release information on Donald Trump?" And of course, we are very interested in all countries to reveal the truth about the candidates that they can understand. But actually, it's really hard for us to release anything worse than what comes out of Donald Trump's mouth every second day. I mean, it's part of his charismatic appeal that he speaks off the cuff. People should not be afraid of their governments. Government should be afraid of their people. The American populace is facing an unconventional warfare scenario. This is information warfare.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Donald Trump is the only one helping these people in Iran. So, Elizabeth Banks, this woman, Bita, is about to be gang-raped and publicly executed, and so are three more women, and they have been doing this to many young people every single day, one or two public executions. So, you're sitting there on your cushy couch talking about Kamala Harris. You claim to be a feminist, you claim to be a humanitarian. Where are you when the women need you? You're a fake, you're a hypocrite, you have no help to anyone. So, if you claim to be a feminist, you claim to be a humanitarian, you claim to be a good person, America, Iran isn't just a military war or peace in the Middle East or oil stabilization. This is a humanitarian issue. They are killing young people every single day. And the only president, the only one that has helped is President Trump.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.