Popular Posts

Byron Donald's The Senate sucks, I'm just gonna come out and say it they suck this is not hard 80% of the American people want to save America Act to pass not 80% of Republicans 80% of the American people and the only Organization that refused to act is the United States Senate. Everybody else is saying this is common sense We should do common sense things. Let's make sure only Americans are voting in our elections make sense, right? Let's protect the franchise of the American people. Let's make sure that people who are sent to Washington are being voted on by Americans who the American people chooses up to them but we have a responsibility to secure that franchise and to secure that process for the American people and What is happening in the US Senate is laziness and quite frankly, it's disgusting What the Senate Democrats don't want to have voter ID in America. Why because they want to maintain their power Senate Republicans don't want to do the right thing and actually have a True filibuster on the floor and debate the matter on the floor because it would take them away from there's precious meetings that they have to conduct I'm sorry. They have a responsibility to open up the Senate floor and debate this issue in front of the American people I agree with Chairman Harris 1000% I want to hear what Chuck Schumer has to say on the on the floor in full debate about why he opposes this measure I want to hear what Elizabeth Warren has to say about why she would oppose this measure I want her to tell the people of Massachusetts Why she believes that the people of Massachusetts should not have to show a photo ID in order to vote in a federal election in the United States of America Just the other day President Obama opened up his presidential library in Chicago. You needed an ID to attend the event So if you're gonna show up for President Obama's library, you got to present a voter ID a photo ID to gain access to that event But to vote in our elections, it's you don't have to do that. That makes no sense It's crazy and it's stupid and so the United States Senate has a responsibility to open up that floor You Senate procedure actually have a debate You have a filibustering debate if Bernie Sanders wants to hold the floor of the US Senate for six months Let him go ahead swap out the depends get some body armor Somebody slip you some some whatever you need keep it going because it demonstrates the stupidity of your arguments And that is what the American people want to see I for one want to see what their argument is But we're not getting that because and to be blunt because we have Republican Senate senators Who still believe that the US Senate is operating in 1990 America? That is ridiculous The Democrats are true radicals. They don't want to negotiate. They don't want to debate. They want to obstruct. They want to obstruct common sense

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

We knew Hillary created the dossier and now we have proof that Barack was calling the shots and the documents to prove it. Declassified documents revealing former CIA director John Brennan briefed then president Obama on Hillary Clinton's purported plan to smear then candidate Trump in 2016, adding to what the national intelligence director has already declassified on this issue and raising more questions tonight about how much more of this will come out before election day. Good evening, Mike. Brett, good evening. These are handwritten notes from former CIA director John Brennan written according to a source familiar after Brennan briefed president Obama. At one point, Brennan writes, quote, approved by Hillary Clinton, a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service. The notes say on 28 of July in the margin Brennan writes POTUS, but that section of the notes are redacted. Then it says any evidence of collaboration between Trump campaign and Russia. The remainder of the notes are redacted, except in the margins where it says JC, Dennis, and Susan. That could be referring to former FBI director James Comey, former Obama chief of staff Dennis McDonough, and former national security advisor Susan Rice. The CIA sent a memo to former FBI director James Comey and Peter Strzok writing, quote, the following information is provided for the exclusive use of your bureau for background investigative action or lead purposes as appropriate. One example, the CIA includes, quote, an exchange redacted discussing U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's approval of a plan concerning U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from the her use of a private email server. At a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, Comey was pressed on what he did with information provided by the CIA. Did you open an investigation? I don't know what that refers to. As I said earlier, that does not ring any bells with me when I read that. You did not receive any investigative referral of this nature. I don't remember it. I don't, I don't remember receiving anything that's described in that letter. We knew Hillary created the dossier and now we have proof that Barack was calling the shots and the documents to prove it.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Election systems across the country are found to have deleted millions of votes cast for President Trump. According to an unaudited analysis of data obtained from Edison Research, states using Dominion voting systems may have switched as many as 435,000 votes from President Trump to Joe Biden. And the author also finds another 2.7 million Trump votes appear to have been deleted by Dominion, including almost 1 million Trump votes in Pennsylvania alone. The experts' claims are quite shocking and starkly contrast the narrative that we've heard. Media claims have been made that the machines were not connected to the internet, but according to the forensic report, that is patently false. The experts examined both Dominion and ES&S machines, and both were connected to the internet using wireless technology. This is a fact that the machine vendors knew well before the election, because their proposal to pitch for the contract included information about internet transmission and wireless capabilities. What is the vehicle for the transmission from the ICP? Is it cellular modem versus VPN? It is a cellular modem that can be configured in a VPN, right? And we currently in Chicago and Cook County, we work with Verizon to secure that network. So we would have the same capabilities here. What wireless chip set/modem does the hardware have? We support a variety. Some of the forensic evidence for this fact includes the wireless chip made by the company to LEAT. This is a picture from the forensic audit of the chip inserted into the machine to transmit information wirelessly. This is a clear admission that they knew the machines were connected to the internet and there were problems, so they had to tally manually. The media also claimed that there was no foreign involvement. But according to the forensic report, that is not true. The 4G card included in the ES&S machines, pictured here, was made by the company to LEAT. The project to manufacture the chips, according to the report, was funded by the Chinese and has ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Some have accused these companies of obfuscating and in some cases misleading election administrators and the American public. So I'd like to ask each of you, do you have components in your supply chain that come from either Russia or China? Chairperson, we do not have components that come from Russia. We do have a limited number of components that come from China. It wasn't our company in the entire report, but we do have components in our products that come from China. Ms. Mathis? Yes, similar feedback here. We take the security of our supply chain very seriously and we actively monitor and assess all aspects of that supply chain, including country of origin. So do you have components from China or Russia? We do not have components from Russia, but we do have, similar to my colleagues, we do have components. And what would be the nature of those components? Similar resistors, capacitors, they're the global supply chain for technology components of that. And what percentage do you know? I don't have. We'll follow up with that. Is there any method of voting that's 100% secure? No. No. No. Do you sell voting machines that have network capabilities installed? Can you be more specific? Yes, you don't have the software installed, but you have the capability of installing it. For remote access software? Yes. We do not. We no longer install any remote access software. That process was discontinued in 2006 and is not allowed by any of the EAC testing. We got a firsthand look when we visited ES&S, the largest manufacturer of voting machines, and talked to CEO Tom Burt. Why is there a sprint thing here and a Verizon thing here? There's a small percentage of jurisdictions in the country, a lot of them are in Florida, who have decided that they want to modem unofficial results to the election office. Voting machines are not connected to the internet. Those are not connected. Voting machines themselves are not connected to the internet. And we knew that wasn't true. And cybersecurity expert Kevin Skoglin wanted to prove it. So he and nine other independent security consultants created their own search engine looking for election systems online. We found over 35 had been left online and we're still continuing to find more. ES&S insists while there are 14,000 of its modems in use, there are firewalls separating those modems from the public internet and that the modems are turned on for just seconds. But Skoglin says that's not enough. We're seeing Illinois and Michigan. Last summer, Skoglin's team found ES&S voting systems online and at least some of the precincts in 11 states, including the battleground states of Florida, Michigan and Wisconsin. If you were able to get inside these systems, could you do more than perhaps mess up the preliminary results? Could you actually get deeper inside the system? Absolutely. And that's my biggest concern. Top computer scientist Andrew Appel agrees with Skoglin. Once the hackers starts talking to the voting machine through the modem, they can hack the software in the voting machine and make it cheat in future elections. In August, Skoglin took his results to election officials and the press, assuming the systems will get taken down. We were astonished when he showed us some of those systems are still online. Modems in voting machines are a bad idea. Those modems are network connections and that leaves them vulnerable to hacking by anybody who can connect to that network. We should make sure that voting machines are not connected to the internet. Period. Period. Mr. Pollis? Chairperson, we've never had any kind of remote access in our Dominion products. But I will say that I do want to draw a caveat. Some of our tabulators are designed around the ability to have an external plug-in modem to transmit unofficial results after it pulls close. Okay. What wireless chipset/modem does the hardware have? We support a variety. So it's really up to the jurisdictions what technology they want to use, what's compatible with their networks. Currently, some jurisdictions are using basically a modem that is a 3D modem, GSM, but we can support multiple varieties of modem. Including the latest 4D standards as well. So the answer is the next question is a 3D or 4G. Verizon, AT or T or Sprint, assuming all? Oh, yeah. All networks, right. Just to point it back, yeah. I mean, we actually transmit from the ICP in Mongolia as well, so we're not limited in networks. And in Puerto Rico, there's three vendors because the island is not covered by any of the vendors completely, so we use three different cellular vendors for some ICPs with this vendor, Maro, AT and T or T-Mobile, I think, in the different parts of the island. Analysts say the theft and destruction of votes are attributed to so-called glitches in Dominion Software and the extent to which this affected results can be verified by hand recounts of votes in each state.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

And I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you for Secretary of State. I yield back. >> May I respond? >> You may, sir. >> Well, first of all, your regret for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job based on what I know. >> That's just a flippant statement, Mr. Secretary. >> Can I respond, Mr. Chairman? >> You may. >> I didn't ask a question. >> Senator, please let the Secretary have a report. >> I'd be happy to, but then I can respond to his- >> Your time's up, Senator, and woefully used, I might add. Your remarks did not represent the view of this committee. Well, Mr. Chairman, well, I'd like to, I can't respond to everything he said because much of these are untrue, but I'll go through a few. First of all, I'm actually very proud of the work we've done with USAID, for example. I don't regret cutting $10 million for male circumcisions in Mozambique. I don't know how that makes us stronger and more prosperous as a nation. I don't regret psychosocial support services. >> I raised the hand, Mr. Secretary, not the Senator. >> Senator, I'd ask you to suspend. You had seven straight minutes. >> I chose to use my time that way, Mr. Chairman, that's my right to use my time that way. >> Please suspend, Secretary Rubin. >> Well, I can go on, I mean, there's other things here. We spent $227,000 for Big Cat's YouTube channel from USAID. We spent $14 million for social cohesion in Mali, whatever the hell that means. So I can go on and on, I got the list here, and there's more that I didn't even bring the whole list. In the case of El Salvador, absolutely, absolutely, we deported gang members. Gang members, including the one that you had a margarita with. That guy is a human trafficker, and that guy is a gang banger, and the evidence is going to be clear. In the days of time you're going to see who you want to defend- >> Mr. Chairman, please, Secretary Rubio has the floor. >> Mr. Chairman, he can't make unsubstantiated comments like that. Secretary Rubio has the floor. You had your time. >> Secretary Rubio should take that testimony to the federal court of the United States because he hasn't done it under oath. >> Here's another point, okay? There is a division in our government between the federal branch and the judicial branch. No judge and the judicial branch cannot tell me or the president how to conduct foreign policy. No judge can tell me how I have to outreach to a foreign partner or what I need to say to them. And if I do reach that foreign partner and talk to them, I have under no obligation to share that with a judiciary branch. Just like a judge cannot order me to negotiate with a foreign minister of Russia, they cannot order me to negotiate with a foreign minister or the president of El Salvador. And if I did negotiate with them, which we have responded to them, and we've told them we've had communications with the president of El Salvador. I am under no obligation, under our division of powers in this country, to share with the judicial branch how I conducted diplomacy of the United States. It would actually be counterproductive. If I started sharing with courts, or frankly, with the media, my conversations with foreign leaders and all of their details, no foreign leader would talk to me again, and we would break trust with them. So I have complied with every court order. What I won't comply with is an order to disclose what I'm saying and what we're talking about with a foreign leader. Because then they won't talk to me, diplomacy doesn't work that way. About the student visas, let me say this, I don't deport anybody, and I don't snatch anybody. The State Department does not have officers in the street snatching everybody. What I do is revoke visas, and it's very simple. A visa is not a right, it is a privilege. People apply for student visas to come into the United States and study. And if you tell me that you're coming to the United States to lead campus crusades, to take over libraries and try to burn down buildings and acts of violence, we're not going to give you a visa. >> But Ms. Oster did? >> We're not going to give you a visa. >> That what she did, come on Mr. Secretary. >> And every single one of these cases, the factors are different. The bottom line is if you come here to serve trouble on our campuses, we will deny you a visa. And if you have a visa and we find you and we'll revoke you, and we're going to do more, there are more coming. We're going to continue to revoke the visas of people who are here as guests and are disrupting our higher education facilities. People are paying money, these kids pay money to go to school, and they have to walk through a bunch of lunatics. >> Writing an op-ed to the top three papers disrupting the foreign policy of the United States. >> I want to do more, I hope we can find more of these things. >> That's pathetic, Mr. Secretary. >> In fact, the other day, the other day, some guy's led a riot, I forgot what university it was. And I asked, please, can you find the arrest records of all the people that were arrested at that riot at that campus? Because if any of them have a visa, we're going to revive them. >> I feel so much safer, you lock up people like Ms. Oster, Ms. Secretary. >> We've had enough time on the subject, thank you very much, and we're going to move to Senator Lee.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

This president is trying to push this SAVE Act which basically would require that for people to register to vote You're gonna have to have proof of who you are

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

- Do you think that this person is a patriot or a traitor? - That's the goat right there. Donald Trump literally took a bullet for this country. This man has God on his side. He shouldn't even be alive. But he is, because God knew that we needed Trump to make America great again. - This is the guy who gave up everything to try to save this country. And everyone came after him, tried to put him in prison, tried to kill him twice, and still became the president of the United States twice. - He's a unique individual. He's a force of nature. Unlike most politicians, because he's not a politician, he's a political leader. It's different. He's not scripted. He's not handled. He's not managed. When Trump speaks, those words come from the heart. He's authentic. He's courageous. And I think he's going to go down in history as the greatest president in our entire country's history. - Do you think that this person is a patriot or a traitor? - He's been devoting his life to the country when he made all those billions of dollars and could have been set off to some private island somewhere, enjoying the money and all the hard work he did. Instead, he gave up his life to work for this country, and he's been working hard as hell. Thank God he's a patriot, and thank God he's our patriot. - Definitely a patriot. He loves his country. He's a true American. I admire him because he loves his country, and I love people who love their country, and so when you love your country, we'll do everything for it. I mean, he's rich. He could do whatever he wants, but he chose to lead this country, and that's what I respect about him. Definitely a patriot.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

We want to show you a moment, the moment that Secretary of State Marco Rubio came into the room and interrupted the president, which would never happen unless something very big had just happened, but he walked into the room and he whispered in the presidency ear, it was either going to be really good news or really bad news. Criminal conspiracy. OK. I'm just given... Yeah, I was just given a note by the Secretary of State saying that we're very close to a deal in the Middle East and they're going to need me pretty quickly. We haven't seen that in 25 years. You might remember this when President Bush was reading a book, My Pet Goat to a Classroom of Second Graders in Florida, and White House Chief of Staff Andy Card walked over to the president in a very similar scene, but whispered a very different message in the president's ear. The message was, quote, "A second plane hit the second tower, America is under attack." For George Bush in America, that was very bad news. But for Donald Trump yesterday and for America and for the world, it was very good news. Donald Trump ends wars. Other people start them, Donald Trump ends them. And at this moment in time, tonight, that is an objective fact. George Bush was reading a book about a goat. Tonight, Donald Trump is the goat.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

♪ Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh ♪ ♪ I'm the king of my own land ♪

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

In focus now, Tommy Pigott, State Department spokesperson, great to have you. First of all, we're learning more and more, so what can you tell us that is unfolding right now on this? And you just heard for the first time the foreign minister now talking about, "Yeah, this is a good deal." Peter Ducey said she looked a little nervous from Greenland wondering what was coming. Well, the real winners here are the American people, are the security of our alliance. What we saw is President Trump identifying a problem, a real problem, and taking steps to address it in only the way that President Trump can. He is truly showing that he is the dealmaker in chief, and what we're seeing are efforts to enhance the NATO alliance, enhance the security of Greenlanders, enhance the security of the United States. That is something that only President Trump could have delivered, and he's truly making this argument about addressing these modern threats we all face and making us all safer. Tommy, talk to me about the military component of this, though, because there are ... it's two-pronged. It's that, and it's also rare earth, and I will get to the rare earth in a moment, but just the military, when he took that military force off the table, it seemed to shift things a little bit. Did that make the deal easier? Well, I think ultimately what made the deal possible is President Trump, and President Trump has a suite of options, and he keeps those options open until he decides to rule them out. Ultimately, what we saw over the last couple days, weeks, really going back to the beginning of this administration is the art of the deal in action. This is something that presidents have wanted to see happen for many, many decades, and President Trump is actually taking steps to make it happen. It's a credit to his leadership. It's also a credit to the vision he has to address problems before they become problems. President Trump's really putting us on a great footing here and making sure that our security is truly enhanced. Yeah, well, and I think, and correct me if I'm wrong, the Alaska purchase, Greenland was originally part of that. That part of the deal didn't hold together, and so all these decades later, we see what we see now. It is the eighth place in the world when it comes to the reserves of the rare earth minerals needed to create and operate technology for pretty much everything. Most of those reserves are still untapped in Greenland. The Arctic nation is home to key minerals needed for consumer electronics, defense systems, medical devices, advanced computing, and clean energy. This is a critical part of that deal. Tommy, talk more. Well, ultimately, this is about access. It's about access for the United States. It's about access from a military perspective. It's about access from a perspective in order to ... from those critical minerals. These are part of all the concerns that President Trump laid out really from the beginning of this administration, talking about those critical minerals, talking about the encroachment of our adversaries on Greenland, talking about the defense of Greenland, the NATO alliance, our defense, modern threats, the Arctic, the list goes on. He's been identifying these threats, and what we're seeing here is President Trump addressing these threats, and also identifying opportunities, identifying opportunities that can make us all prosperous. That's the art of the deal in action, and President Trump is showing, once again, why is the dealmaker in chief? So is it time to hit the shores of Greenland as Americans? I mean, they don't have a lot of infrastructure there yet. Does our footprint in those small areas that I understand from the potential deal that's coming, we will have control over small footprints probably near military bases? Talk to me about that. Well, as President Trump said, details on this will be forthcoming, and I don't want to get ahead of the president, and as these discussions are being finalized. But again, I think it's important to stress the context here of President Trump identifying this problem. Everyone's saying, "A deal wasn't possible. Don't bring this up. Ignore this." President Trump's saying, "No. I'm not going to ignore this threat to our security. I'm not going to ignore the opportunities." He's having these hard conversations, and the people to have these hard conversations with are our security partners. So we're seeing President Trump in action, once again putting America first. But when he puts America first, that actually helps the NATO alliance. It helps everyone in terms of our security and prosperity. Talk to me about the board of peace, if you can. 25, upwards of 25 members now. Well, this is something that came out of the Gaza ceasefire deal that was announced, unprecedented global coalition that was put together by President Trump that saw the release of hostages, that saw humanitarian assistance entering Gaza in a way that wasn't being looted by Hamas. And so what we see now is President Trump building on this unprecedented global coalition, trying to see the implementation of peace and prosperity, making sure that we're seeing these peace deals put into action. President Trump, who has negotiated eight peace deals around the world in just a year, an unprecedented advancement of peace. We're seeing this board of peace being an effort to see that long-term peace and prosperity. So a really historic announcement that we saw on Davos here, building on the huge momentum, the global coalition that President Trump has put together. Yeah. I'm looking down at my notes. It's been 103 days since Israel and Hamas, the ceasefire agreement came into place. And of course, we've seen some bubbling up and the president and the secretary of state Rubio have said, you know, that can happen. But the peace is holding, the ceasefire is holding. And so that is a huge development in all of this. It is great to have you on the program. Tommy Pickett, come back. Thanks for having me on.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

>> Thank you very much. We have to get a picture of this, come on. It's so beautiful. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you. >> Nice to see you. >> Nice to see you. >> Nice to see you. >> Nice to see you. >> Welcome Mr. President. Yeah, most of the room is. >> Yes, that's right. You're doing a good job, by the way. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Welcome, Mr. President. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you very much. I'm the commander of the state, please. >> I look forward to seeing you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. I don't want to hurt you. En son a veg.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

O's president Donald J. Trump an apology President Trump has been indicted by Fulton County May I remind you that Fulton County has been found to be in violation of election law not once for the hand on it, but twice for the machine count and now we can prove that they Intentional had intentional human intervention, which is the predicate for election fraud You all know our case is seb 2023 thank you - 25 In that case, you know that it involved seventeen thousand eighteen hundred and fifty two votes counted without ballot images you also know that for the first machine count 20,000 713 ballots were counted With what I like to call receipts. I guess the fancy word is tabulator tapes And I always like to say you can't get out of Walmart these days without showing your receipt But for some reason you can count 20,000 votes without a receipt the last part of this complaint Perhaps is the most concerning because we've uncovered some recent information that makes it so In addition to proving that 3930 ballots were scanned and Counted I want to say that again and Counted and I sure hope that miss Charlene McGowan is listening miss McGowan on May 7th You and your team got up before the board and said yeah, I think mr. Rossi's right these ballots were scanned twice But we're not sure if they were counted twice that is a lie and We know that because the data that shows they're counted twice is on the cast vote records and That is available to the Secretary of States Other experts know that those ballots were counted twice Media sources know I saw mr. Nissi from the AJC just walk up here and not to get him in trouble But he recently reported he thinks they were counted twice also And that's from the AJC Sorry mark if I'm if I'm going too far just say stop Joe you're gonna get me in trouble Okay, so they were counted twice for the second machine count We know with certainty that this Duplication of ballots was not I want to repeat was not an Administrative error and I'm gonna demonstrate to you how we know that shortly Rather the duplication Process was due to intentional human intervention And I'm not a lawyer, but when I ran this by a few lawyers they told me this is the phrase Human intentional human intervention is the predicate for Election I'm gonna use the f-word fraud I Okay, you're gonna hear me you're gonna hear me say that several times heard of this presentation I said that the ballots were tabulated twice counted twice and It was not done accidentally This slide shows that a ballot on the right over here was scanned and counted creates a file Some of the experts in the room like Garland know this but if it's scanned again, it creates another file Which means it is counted twice So, how did this happen? This is a very complicated slide That has taken months for technical experts to develop and explain It's also very difficult to explain still but it basically shows that ballots were scanned on one day and then they were randomly picked these batches of ballots and created new batches and scanned a Second day on a different tabulator. So you probably can't understand this slide So I'm going to show you how it was done very crudely. Okay? All right. So on that first chair you have a stack of ballots. You see them over there Again, my props are not professional. I'm just doing what I can to get the message out on the second chair You have a second stack of ballots that were scanned. Let's say December 2nd Wednesday when the midnight deadline was for Doing the election recount on the third chair. You have a third stack of ballots that were scanned on Wednesday now Someone or some group. I don't know who but this is not accidental what they did They went to one stack of ballots Randomly grabbed a few stacks from that No order I got a random group, okay Some of my flipped around so that they count backwards this time Then they went to another stack of ballots that were already scanned You notice I'm not necessarily picking them from the top, right? I'm just grabbing randomly and one more time I'll do it. For example, they went to another step and Then The next day they came back with that randomly selected stack and guess what they did That last year over there is a tabulator they ran them through On a second day through a different tabulator and they did that for 3930 ballots who in the room thinks that's accidental raise your hand. I Don't think so All right, I'm gonna close with how I started this Little talk here. I'm gonna read it one more time. If you don't mind It says in addition to proving That 3930 ballots were scanned and counted two times for the second machine count, which was the certified count We now know with certainty that this duplication of ballots was not a mere administrative error Rather the duplication process was due to intentional human Intervention and I said the lawyers tell me that that is the predicate for election fraud and now in closing I remind you about Mr. Raffensperger's ex post of August 1st if you have the data bringing it bring it to him Mr. Secretary, we're bringing the data to you and we are counting on you to do the right thing and investigate independently independently is critical SEB 2023-25. Thank you

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

No tax on tips, no tax on overtime, did that matter? >> Yes. >> She's worked here for almost 50 years. >> Yes. >> She paid tax for all those years on those tips, right? >> Yeah, I appreciate it. >> But not anymore. No more tax on people. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, everyone. Thank you. [Applause] >> Thank you, everybody. >> Thank you. >> Thank you.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Do you guys remember Melissa Hortman, the Minnesota state rep that had her life taken from her by Tim Waltz's aide after voting to take away health care from illegal immigrants? She was unalived in her home by Vance Bolter, who was later caught after a manhunt. He then sent a letter to the FBI and Cash Patel saying that it was Tim Waltz who forced him to do it. Both Vance Bolter and his wife worked for Tim Waltz for years in different states. Was Melissa Hortman unalived because she voted against a multi-billion dollar money laundering fraud? The fraud that she voted against that heavily implicated illegal aliens? Specifically Somalians who have been racketing this kind of child care, health care, rackets, and cooperating with our corrupt government? Today it's breaking news that the money laundering scam in Minnesota of billions of dollars for health care offices, child daycares, Medicaid, and various forms of care agencies, these money laundering frauds have been exposed. And it all comes back to Tim Waltz. I did what leaders do, I stepped up and I got the job done for the people of Minnesota. Very shortly after this, she was unalived in her home by Vance Bolter. Vance Bolter and his wife worked for Tim Waltz for years in different states.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.