Popular Posts

I'm going to honor some -- now, okay, you ready? Can you handle this? Hamburgers for all. (applause) (inaudible) Okay, ready? (inaudible) You got it. (applause) (inaudible) Nice to see you, everybody. (applause)

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

It is always the right time to expose the truth to the American people about the deep state tactics that have been used time and time again, fundamentally to undermine the foundational principles of our republic, and in so many cases, to undermine the decisions that the American people make when they cast their votes in our elections to decide who they want to lead our country. And so the documents that we released really pointed to the fact that the 2019 impeachment occurred because there were members of the intelligence community working directly with House Democrats, specifically Adam Schiff, who's on the House Intelligence Committee at the time, concocting this narrative, weaponizing the whistleblower process, lying and abusing their power, all to create this manufactured basis that Nancy Pelosi then used to drive this impeachment against Donald Trump in 2019. I'll hit the high points on these documents. There are details and hundreds of pages of transcripts that we released in conjunction with House Intel Chairman Rick Crawford. But the bottom line is this. Number one, the whistleblower, so-called whistleblower who came forward, presented no evidence and no firsthand knowledge. This is a person who had heard about a conversation that President Trump had with Zelensky, then went straight to Adam Schiff on the House Intelligence Committee. This is where they came up with this false narrative. And this so-called whistleblower then went and filed a complaint with the intelligence community inspector general. The other witness, so-called witness to this is somebody who also had zero firsthand knowledge and presented zero evidence. Someone who was also a co-author of the 2017 Russia hoax intelligence community assessment that President Obama had ordered be created in conjunction with John Brennan and James Clapper at the time. Again, no firsthand knowledge or evidence. And someone who said that even after reading the transcript, he didn't really see the issue there until the whistleblower had explained it to him. And lastly, the inspector general himself. And this is really such a violation of public trust and the responsibility that we expect all of our inspectors generals to have in that he didn't conduct a full investigation. He didn't even ask to see the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and Zelensky. And he admitted to Congress that he didn't have any first. He did not have any evidence that he was relying on. He had made a criminal referral to the Department of Justice based on this so-called whistleblower's complaint. Department of Justice came back and said there's nothing here. This inspector general then went to Congress anyway and presented it to them. All of this coming down to the bottom line of which this was a partisan political attempt, once again, to undermine the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump as President of the United States.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Jackals, hyenas, barking at 'em, laughing at 'em, they nip his toes and eat the food that's in his domain. They do this, and they get closer and closer and bolder and bolder. Until one day, that lion gets up and tears the shit out of everybody, runs like the wind, eats everything in his path. 'Cause every once in a while, the lion has to show the jackals who he is.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Now there are many, many reasons to end the Iranian regime, take out their nuclear capability, take out their missile building, their terror financing, their entire military. But at the end of the day, I believe President Trump's epic fury is about restoring civilized value and civilized behavior in the Middle East. My friend Conrad Black, writing in The New York Sun, puts it this way. Let me quote, "The world's foremost terrorism-sponsoring state is about to cease to exist, and the war on terror that was unofficially launched on September 11, 2001, in the ashes of the World Trade Center, will substantially be won." Well done. And this is no forever war, as Trump critics keep complaining, but the scale and scope of geopolitical change, because of Mr. Trump's courage, is almost intellectually immeasurable, while all the Gulf states are behind him, and even the large European nations reluctantly supporting. We have heard nary a peep from China or Russia. They're the big losers in America's epic fury. China will lose its cheap, heavily priced, discounted oil. Russia will lose its Iranian-made drones. Both countries will have lost all of their Middle East influence. Meanwhile, a very similar story of Sino-Russian lost influence is occurring in South America, with Mr. Trump's path-breaking move in Venezuela. And after watching the use of America's military might, I would think China will surely be thinking twice or maybe five times more about invading Taiwan. Finally, President Trump issued a very clear message to the people of Iran that a historic moment of freedom is there, if they can seize it. Take a listen, please. Finally, to the great, proud people of Iran, I say tonight that the hour of your freedom is at hand. America is backing you with overwhelming strength and devastating force. Now is the time to seize control of your destiny and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach. This is the moment for action. Do not let it pass. Yes, yes, indeed. The battle is always about freedom and liberty for mankind. There is nothing more important. Bravo, President Trump.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Barack Obama had a drone campaign, he fired 560 drone strikes, not just terrorists, but killed an American citizen, I'm more or all lucky, did it on the ground, violating sovereignty instead of in international waters, and he regularly did what are called double-tap and even triple-tap strikes. I interviewed David Shedd, who on my podcast, What the Hell is Going on Today, who was the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency under Obama, and he said, "We did double-tap strikes all of the time. We usually had a second predator in the sky waiting for the intelligence to clear to see if there were any survivors so we could take them out." So this was a regular practice under the Obama administration because they were going after terrorists. Trump has declared these people, foreign terrorist organizations, he's using the same authority as the Obama administration. Now in terms of how we characterize the fight between the United States and these drug cartels, here's what the DEA administrator, Terry Cole, said earlier today, "This is all about saving American citizens and protecting our national security." All right, so that's basically in a nutshell, it's the 10-second elevator pitch, what this is all about. Democrats say that the Trump administration is desperately trying to make this like, "Oh, it's Al-Qaeda or it's ISIS." Well, I counted up, about 3,100 Americans died at the hands of Al-Qaeda and ISIS. Last year in this country, it was 80,391 people died of overdose deaths in the United States. So is this or is this not a threat to American national security and to Americans? If you're killed by a plane or if you're killed by poison, you're equally dead, right? And these people are poisoning the American people. This is an act of terrorism. President has full legal authority to do this. First of all, he designated them foreign terrorist organizations, then he notified Congress that we were in an armed conflict with those terrorist organizations. Then he had the Office of Legal Counsel prepare a memo setting the parameters for what was legal and what was within the laws of war for carrying out these strikes. And they've been following that, not a single lawyer has objected.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

It's a huge deal because President Trump is the kingmaker in Republican primaries That's why it's such a big deal. Take a look here times Trump endorses one GOP primaries This is congressional and gubernatorial in 2020. It was 98% in 2022 It was 95% in 2024. It was 96% President Trump has the magic touch when it comes to endorsing in Republican primaries And when he doesn't endorse you you go to quote the great movie good burger into the grinder And so Cassidy was one of the Republican senators who voted to convict President Trump in his second impeachment trial. How have those Republican senators done when you voted to convict President Trump in that second impeachment trial had you do for reelection not so hot to Trump because let's take a look here Okay GOP senators who voted to convict Trump won their next election just one out of five that one is Lisa Murkowski in the great state of Alaska, which of course has that top four primary situation going on there So very very different than the traditional primary structure that is throughout the rest of the United States the bottom line is this the vast majority of Republicans who voted to convict Trump who had a reelection either lost or actually they didn't even run they retired They resigned in the case of Ben Sasse or there are two up for reelection this year Bill Cassidy and Susan Collins up in Maine But the bottom line is this if you voted to convict Trump so far your chances of winning reelection happen quite quite small and Bill Cassidy, of course just got a major impediment to his road to reelection if let low decides to run This really largely has to do with how much Republicans still support Donald Trump. Yeah I mean look Donald Trump was popular in 2016 He was really popular in 2018 really popular in 2020 popular in 2022 popular in 2024 And now we come to 2026 among Republicans exactly, right? And he is still quite popular amongst Republicans at this point. Look overall in July. It was 89 percent That was six months ago today. It's basically the same at 88 percent How about strongly approved those who don't just like downstream, but love them love them love them in July. It was 61 percent It's the same 61 percent now and that is why the GOP voters when Donald Trump says something They say how quickly can we get to Donald Trump's position? If you want to see the impact that this had just this one statement from President Trump over the weekend What did it do in the betting markets to Bill Cassidy's chances of being elected? Yeah, you look at the prediction markets Take a look here chance to be the 20 to 2026 GOP nominee for the Louisiana Senate race Bill Cassidy at just an 18 percent chance at this point and this lines up very much with what we've seen historically speaking That is when Donald Trump goes against you in Republican primary your chances fall through the floor All right, that number says everything Harry and thank you very much

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

just so we were clear if a foreigner comes to your country and demands that you accept their culture as your culture or demands that you change your beliefs that is not a foreigner that is not an immigrant what that is is an invader that is someone that is coming over to your space to take over and invade it so when you sit there and you look at what's happening in New York you look at what's happening in Texas you look at what's happening in the places where these people came from you look at Somalia you look at all of these individuals who are being put into a position of power who support this type of invasion you need to understand what's coming next they will take away our weapons they will tell us that we cannot eat certain foods they will tell us that we cannot go to certain places they will tell that our women that way they have to wear certain clothes they will tell them that they have to dress modest they were forced them to do a lot of different things you will have to deal with people praying in the middle of the street while you're driving and stopping you and invading your movement your space you need to understand what's taking place in America so that you can understand that these people are not coming here with good intentions this is not me saying that I hate people this is me basically saying look if you like the fact that America is a free place where you get the freedom to believe in what religion you want to believe in if you get you get the freedom to decide what you want to do as long as nobody is getting hurt if you love that part of America the freedom of choice part of America you need to understand when people come over and they say that you don't have a choice they probably should go because you don't get to tell us what to do in our own country it's not being rude it's just saying hey look this country was built in a way where everybody can come here and feel happy and feel blessed and enjoy the fact that this is a free nation not a nation that will be enslaved by any foreigner invading it

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.