Popular Posts

[Music] [Music]

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Fox News alert the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by his sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate and undermine the legitimacy of an election. There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. Gabbard got her hands on a House intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Gabbard spent over 2,000 hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about this, and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in. Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies, either. Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama. There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again, and formed the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier. And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of any of this was ever true. There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations. But they were repeatedly overruled by CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed, even without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry-picked the intelligence, lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank and File CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA Director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Donald Trump knows that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Putin hated Secretary Clinton so much that the flip side of that coin was. He had a clear preference for the person running against the person he hated so much. It was Russia in a very systematic way in trying to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected. This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House. What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference, but like most people, expected Hillary to win and had a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released. Now, if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin drop the dirt? There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, "psychoemotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness," and that then-Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, "clear preference" for Trump. Now, if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed, why didn't they leak it to help Trump win? How credible was the information Hillary Clinton found? All I have seen is what the intelligence committee have reported through their investigation. I think the underlying point there is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had, and the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as President Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing, in order to support Donald Trump's election, they would have released the most damning of that information. Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win, but they put it out there anyway. In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections, and caused chaos in our country. Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted. Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former President Obama in criminal behavior? We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this. The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact. Even two years later, after the election, Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true, and he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it. They're undermining our alliances, cozying up to Russia. What happened to the Republican Party? They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB, actively blocking legislation that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened? Now, I don't know if it's possible to indict a former president for actions he took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly, but Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to Congress. Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier? I don't. Do you know if the bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as part of any court filings, applications? I have no awareness. Did the CIA rely on it? No. Why not? Because we didn't. It wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done. It was not. No, that's a lie. Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge, it's accountability, and it's time for people to pay the price.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

can't lie to a bank to get a mortgage. And if they did, our government would throw the book at them. There simply cannot be different rules for different people. All right. Well, if you guess the Trump-hating New York attorney general who's now charged with mortgage fraud, congratulations. You got that right. That post came a full four years after she allegedly did what she was accusing Donald Trump of doing. She's vowing to fight, though, her charges as her allies try to normalize breaking the law. What Tish James, and again, we're still getting the details, but if it's related to this mortgage issue, I mean, this is something that everyone in America, or many people at least, if you're lucky enough to be able to buy a house in America, you deal with this, right? The federal government doesn't go after all of these people for doing this. Bank fraud or will we consider mortgage fraud type cases are very common. Joining me exclusively, Bill Pulte, federal housing director, Bill, the angle broke the story back in April that you sent a criminal referral to the DOJ for Letitia James. Now, to those downplaying the seriousness of these charges saying basically everyone does it, what's your response tonight? Well, mortgage fraud is very serious, Laura. I don't like how people are trying to minimize this and trying to minimize violating the law. She was charged with bank fraud. I mean, that's a very serious thing. And you know, Laura, I'll say this, when people lie on small things, they tend to lie on big things and they tend to lie a lot. And going back to the 1980s, this subject said that she was married to her father. That doesn't make any sense for purposes of getting a mortgage application. And then you have, she has these three different properties. She has two in Virginia, one that she claims is her primary residence. Another one that she claims is her second residence with the, which the DOJ is now, and, and Lindsay Halligan has done a great job, I think at laying this out is she's Letitia James appears to be representing it as an investment property for her taxes. So I think Ms. James has a world of problems. And I just want to tell everyone, if, if there is mortgage fraud and you commit mortgage fraud in this country, we're going to come after you. It doesn't matter whether you're a Republican, a Democrat or a sophisticated person like Ms. James. Yeah, to me, I watched this and I watched her reaction last night and she's trying to do that kind of righteous indignation and, and the facts will show, in other words, saying it's just political retribution, Donald Trump's weaponizing government. That's kind of rich, don't you think, coming from her? Well, it is, but what's also concerning Laura is, you know, we have a tax system in this country and we have certain things, you know, I run Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the president, as you know, and we're trying to turn these companies around. We're trying to lower housing costs. We can't have attorney generals out there saying that something is a primary residence when really it's not, or that it's a secondary residence when it's not. We need all hands on deck to reverse what's happened these last four years. President Trump is committed to it. And again, it doesn't matter whether it's Letitia James or somebody else. I'll raise one other thing with you, Laura, which was fascinating in this indictment that U.S. Attorney Halligan did. She lays out in there, and I didn't know this, but it's fascinating to me that Letitia James, according to the indictment, said that she had a primary residence at the secondary home for purposes of insurance. I believe, and I don't know for sure, we'll have to see what happens, that that's insurance fraud. And a lot of people just think, Laura, well, it's mortgage fraud. You have downstream crimes when you have mortgage fraud. You have insurance fraud, you have tax fraud. And so I wouldn't be surprised to see a superseding indictment, But of course, that would be all up to the DOJ. Very, very--

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Attention, please, ladies and gentlemen, in recognition of the anniversary of 9/11, the most deadly and vicious attack on our American homeland in our history, the New York Yankees take this moment to honor the victims of this tragedy and those who work tirelessly to bring back our great city. The New York Yankees welcome back to Yankee Stadium, the 45th and 47th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, for the solemn anniversary of September 11, 2001.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.