20 posts from Thursday, October 23, 2025

-You pushed out on social media about doing away with mail-in ballots and potentially electronic voting machines. Can you explain on that how -- -Well, I will. That's a very off topic, just really quickly. Mail-in ballots are corrupt. Mail-in ballots -- you can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots. And we, as a Republican Party, are going to do everything possible that we get rid of mail-in ballots. We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt. And you know that we're the only country in the world -- I believe -- I may be wrong, but just about -- the only country in the world that uses them because of what's happened -- massive fraud all over the place. The other thing we want changed are the machines. For all of the money they spend, it's approximately 10 times more expensive than paper ballots. And paper ballots are very sophisticated, with the watermark paper and everything else. We would get secure elections. We'd get much faster results than machines. I mean, they say we're going to have the results in two weeks. With paper ballots, you have the results that night. Most people almost -- but most people -- many countries use paper ballots. It's the most secure form. So, between paper ballots -- very, very important -- paper ballots -- and I think maybe even more important, the mail-in voting -- we're going to end mail-in voting. It's a fraud. If you have mail-in -- even Jimmy Carter, with this commission, they set it up. He said, "The one thing about mail-in voting -- you will never have an honest election if you have mail-in -- and it's time that the Republicans get tough and stop it because the Democrats want it. It's the only way they can get elected because with men and women's sports and with transgender for everybody and open borders and all of the horrible things -- and now the new thing is they love crime. They're fighting me on the fact that I've made Washington, D.C. safe. We're not going to get mugged, beaten up, or killed, like all the people you've been watching get so badly hurt. I'm glad -- I hate to take your time on this, but I'm glad you asked me that question. We're going to stop mail-in ballots because it's corrupt. You know, when you go to a voting booth and you do it the right way, and you go to a state that runs it properly, you go in -- they even ask me. They ask me for my license plate for identifying. I said, "I don't know if I have it." He said, "Sir, you have to have it." I was very impressed, actually, but it's very hard to cheat with mail-in voting. As you know, what happens in California, it's so corrupt where some people get five, six, seven ballots delivered to them. Now, we got to stop mail-in voting, and the Republicans have to lead the charge. The Democrats want it because they have horrible policy. If you have mail-in voting, you're not going to have many Democrats get elected. That's bigger than anything having to do with redistricting, believe me. And the Republicans have to get smart. We're not going to have a country. I said, for a long time, at rallies, every -- you need borders, and you need free and fair elections. Those two things. Otherwise, you don't have. We have strong borders now. In 90 days, Mr. President, we didn't have one -- zero, zero, and three months. Not one person came in illegally into our country. In fact, even I find that hard to believe, but it's run by a little bit of a liberal group that put out the numbers, so I guess it's -- but zero, zero, and zero. You go back a year ago, two years ago, three millions of people poured into our country. It was terrible. Thank you very much.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

She can say one sentence six different ways and still say nothing. She's unburdened by what has been, mostly because she never explained what it was in the first place. She laughs before she answers a question, and sometimes that's the whole answer. She starts by saying, "Let me be clear," and then isn't, and somehow circles back to, "Let me be clear." She says moving forward so often, her podium is on wheels. She talks about the significance of the passage of time, so long you actually feel it passing. She wants to find time by saying it's the thing that passes over time. Her teleprompter doesn't scroll, it just loops the same line until everyone forgets the question. She once gave a speech about the importance of speeches. She once said holistically, so many times in one speech, the audience reached enlightenment. Her laugh comes out at the exact moment everyone else stops laughing. She preaches that, "It's time for us to do what we have been doing, and that time is every day." She once explained water for 12 minutes straight. She once explained school buses to a room full of bus drivers, and the only thing they understood is that they are big and yellow. She leaves people more confused than before she started talking. Her speeches are so repetitive. After she's done with a campaign, every parrot in town can recite them. She can redefine a word six times before anyone realizes she never defined it. She only answers pre-scripted questions, and if someone dares to ask a real question, she starts laughing until someone comes and saves her. Her press conferences end with reporters forgetting what they even asked. She once explained democracy as "the thing we do when we do democracy." When she runs out of things to say, she'll talk about how she just fell out of a coconut tree. She laughs the hardest right after saying the least. She is the most word salad woman in the world.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

If this movement is truly against billionaires and the powerful, why is it funded by billionaires and the powerful? This is not about dismantling power. This is about rearranging power. So according to several sources, including Fox News, George Soros and his Open Society Action Fund granted three million dollars to Indivisible. Now this is one of the primary organizers of the No Kings protest. Soros' larger network, the Open Society Foundation, gave over 7.6 million to the same operation. We're almost at 11 million dollars, but Soros is not alone. If you follow the funding trail, it leads to what a surprise the Arabella network. Now you add in the Bill Gates Foundation or the Ford Foundation, or here's my favorite, the Rockefeller network. There is now this organization funded by billionaires, Riots Inc, and it is the permanent protest industrial complex. These tactics were developed by the CIA, and they're called color revolutions. And what they do is they flood the streets with "organic" protesters, they control the media narrative, they destabilize the existing system, and then they overthrow that system and install a new one. It is part of a longer game. Once you convince free people that freedom itself is the problem, they'll beg for a chain. And that's when the kings, the real kings, step out from behind the curtain. When there's an emergency for your own good, you have to remain inside. You're not an essential worker. You can only shop at Home Depot. That's the sign of a king. Kings don't have to wear crowns. Usually kings just sign checks. Sometimes they fund revolutions. They are the ones writing the script for the resistance for their own power and kingdoms.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.