71 posts from Wednesday, May 29, 2024

Tammy Bruce: “With everything we’ve seen with how the American People have responded to this unfairness, we don’t like unfairness. The Country is built on a blind Justice System…It is not a game.”

Jesse Watters: “This is a case with a crime they won’t tell you, and it’s not even in the D.A.’s jurisdiction, but the jury can pick whatever crime they want, and they can all disagree on the crime, and it’s still a unanimous decision…It’s like a buffet!”

Greg Gutfeld: “We were told for, I don’t know, three years, that ‘No one is above the law,’ but they were saying that because they were making sure that Trump was below the Law. They didn’t raise the bar for him, they lowered it, and so you are prosecuting the current Leading Candidate with an unprecedented theory that is so difficult to follow that nobody knows what’s going on. Wouldn’t you want to streamline this, and make it the best possible, most persuasive argument possible since this is the leading Presidential Candidate?”

Thank you Kevin! Kevin O’Leary: “If I polled 10,000 Independent Voters right now, let’s say I could just wave a magic wand and do that on a panel, I bet you after all of these six weeks, whatever it’s been, even if you watch the synopsis every night on the News somewhere, whatever outlet you watch, you are still 99% totally confused on what the hell is going on…IT’S BAD FOR THE AMERICAN BRAND!”

Greg Gutfeld: “No one knows what the crime is, but it’s the trial - That is the crime. What is interesting about this is it paints Trump in an incredibly appealing way. He’s up against the wall. Meanwhile, Joe Biden needs a wall to stand up on. And this guy, he’s best when he’s angry, and he’s focused, and he’s direct. When you compare the way he is, and that kind of energy to what is in the White House now, it’s persuasive. I mean, you look at this guy, and you go, ‘I get it, that guy’s pissed off, and he’s clear.’ Meanwhile, this guy speaks in these amorphous fantasies about ‘a threat to Democracy.’ He can’t solve anything. He doesn’t know what’s going on, and this guy is fighting for his life. I mean, it’s a pretty stark choice for Americans if they‘re paying attention to this, but maybe most of them, they’re tuned out, because they know this is all B.S.”

Neil Cavuto and Shannon Bream should team up and do a Show together. The Ratings wouldn’t be good, because they’re anti-MAGA, but it’s not all about the Ratings!

Mr. Wonderful: “This is bad for the American Brand!”

Judge Jeanine: “That’s bizarre—NO ONE has heard of this…”

Jim Trusty: “As a prosecutor, that judgment has really widened the playing field here by saying there doesn't need to be unanimous agreement.”

Jim Trusty: “It's the basics of is there any crime here at all?”

Only the 39 Kids that had to be there showed up!

The Scholars and Legal Experts are saying, “THERE IS NO CRIME.”

I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE CHARGES ARE IN THIS RIGGED CASE—I AM ENTITLED TO SPECIFICITY JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE. THERE IS NO CRIME!

Criminal Defense Attorney David W. Fischer, “The prosecution has not established that a criminal offense took place.”

Kash Patel: “@realDonaldTrump’s case is littered with reasonable doubt because he is not guilty- there is no crime. He is [an] innocent man.”

Andy McCarthy: “NDAs are legal. An intent to defraud cannot be derived from the performance of a legal act.”

Jim Trusty: “That is unlike any trial I could ever think of that you go through the entire trial, and it's still an open question of how this is a felony case.”

Lawrence Jones: “The crime has still not been presented before the court.”

Laura Ingraham: “There was no crime that was committed.”

Doug Collins, Fox News: “Number one we should have never been here to start with. This is a prosecution in search of a crime. It's not there. Donald Trump didn't do anything.”

David Gelman, Fox Business: “Alvin Bragg didn’t want to try this case. The only reason he did it is because former D.A.’s in his Office went and wrote a book pretty much saying, ‘Hey Alvin, you should do this because it’s political’…Nothing has been proven here. That’s why I keep [saying] there should be a directed verdict, meaning the Judge should take it out of the jury’s hands, and say, ‘Prosecution, you did not meet your burden, you did not find that there is a crime here. Donald Trump, go home, go campaign.’”

Gregg Jarrett: “There is no credible evidence that Trump engineered or even knew about booking entries by accountants that were not false at all. Nor is there any plausible evidence that he willfully violated campaign laws that were not violations at all. Where is the fraud that prosecutors argued in their opening statement? Like Bigfoot, it’s a fictitious missing link in the case. This has always been a trial in search of an imaginary crime and a disgraceful charade. This case has reasonable doubt written all over it.”

Bill O’Reilly: “There is zero evidence he even thought about campaign funding statutes. Repeat. Zero evidence. In order to convict, there has to be ‘criminal intent,’ as the nation saw with the Hillary Clinton private email thing. So, simple man that I am, I can't see a conviction.”

Caroline Polisi, CBS Mornings: “Trump himself didn’t go on the drop down menu and say these were reimbursements or retainer fee.”

Mike Davis: “When CNN’s Jake Tapper is even admitting that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, you know it's a bad day for the prosecution.”

Mark O'Mara, CNN Legal Analyst: “Four hour closing argument is way too long ... Making it more complicated, there’s reasonable doubt."

Trial Attorney Randy Zelin, CNN: “There is reasonable doubt all over this case.”

Byron York: “Prosecutors did not prove that Trump, intending to defraud, caused false company records to be made, starting in Feb 2017. They never proved that he did it or told anybody to do it. And if they did not prove that, it’s over.”

Andrew Cherkasky: “When you can't explain the crime, sometimes that's the evidence of innocence in and of its own right - When you charge them with something, and then you're waiting, and you're waiting, and you never get to it. That's the idea that the person was innocent all along.”

Pam Bondi: "He committed no crime...There is nothing there."

Gregg Jarrett: "The element of the alleged crimes were never proven in this Case - Business Records were not false, they were accurate. Trump had no involvement, there's no evidence he willfully violated Election Laws, and no Laws were even broken. Plus, it's factually impossible to influence an Election after it's over, yet that's how the Indictment reads...Where is the crime? It's nowhere! This is what I call a Bigfoot Case. It's a Trial in search of an imaginary crime."

Gregg Jarrett: "This Case against Donald Trump is Election Interference and Brazen Lawfare."

Pete Hegseth: "The Prosecution's case is a disaster!"

NDA’s ARE TOTALLY LEGAL AND ACCEPTED!

DEFENSE OF COUNSEL DEFENSE!

Gregg Jarrett: “They manipulated the justice system to create this illusion of wrongdoing…”

THE D.A.’s OFFICE WAS ALLOWED TO GO ON WITH 5 HOURS OF BULL…. YESTERDAY. I have no rights against this Crooked Judge’s Gag Order!

BIDEN WITCH HUNT!

I DIDN’T HAVE A FIXER, I HAD A LAWYER WHO, AT THAT TIME, WAS FULLY ACCREDITED AND ACCEPTED WITHIN THE LEGAL COMMUNITY, BUT THE JUDGE IS NOT ALLOWING ME TO USE THE RELIANCE ON COUNSEL DEFENSE. I MAY BE THE ONLY PERSON IN THE COUNTRY NOT ALLOWED TO DO SO AND, THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS A VERY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND RESTRICTIVE GAG ORDER. NOT FAIR — FREEDOM!