Receipts
Previously, on this topic... 919 contradictions detected
Severity:
Sort:
moderate
2 days later
federal-permitting-is-complete
“Federal permitting is complete”
vs.
“Federal permitting process is virtually complete on these houses”
The source (June 8) states federal permitting is 'complete' — a definitive, finished status. Two days later (June 10), the same speaker walks this back to 'virtually complete,' which explicitly means not fully done. On the same specific topic (federal permitting for LA fire rebuild), 'complete' vs. 'virtually complete' is a meaningful factual contradiction: one claims the process is finished, the other concedes it is not. The softening language suggests the June 8 claim was an overstatement.
moderate
2 days later
federal-permitting-is-complete
“Federal permitting is complete”
vs.
“Federal permitting process is virtually complete on these houses”
Effectively a duplicate of Candidate 1 (same date, near-identical wording, only 'do to' corrected to 'due to'). The same contradiction applies: the source on June 8 declares federal permitting 'complete' (done), while this June 10 post characterizes it as only 'virtually complete' (almost but not fully done) — a direct factual retreat on the status of the same permitting process.