Search Posts

So, Trump, you know, he can be at a press conference and you get the typical New York Times person who's, you know, thinks they're really clever but they're pretty dense and they ask a leading question, "Do you approve of torture or something like that?" And he says, "You have a low IQ. Where did you come up with that stupid question?" And everybody's shocked. And the next day, Trump calls the reporter low IQ and da-da-da-da-da. But everybody was thinking that. And he comes out, that's his fate. He comes out and I think he would make the argument, if we were to have him, that that methodology that repulses and causes controversy is sort of the jet fuel for the radical agenda to undo the revolution. Because if you're sober and judicious and you talk in therapeutic language, you're not going to create deterrence. The thing about him is he's trying to tell people, "I am capable of saying anything to anybody at any time, anywhere. I just want you to let you know. I don't care." And that creates a lot of hatred, of course, anxiety, but also creates uncertainty why he pushes through this agenda. And you can see it with a press corps, when they ask questions, they're nasty but they are very worried and anxious and they're confused by him and that's what he wants. It's like he pulls out a six-gun and shoots one of them, I don't mean that literally. Like he's in a cowboy thing and they don't know what he's going to do. And so that's why they hate him so much. They want everybody to be really nice to them and praise them and say the American Bar Association is going to adjudicate which law school gets credited. And they're all leftists and they only credit things with leftist professors and he comes along and says, "I don't know who they are. They're just a bunch of bogus people, as far as I'm concerned. They're not fair. Get rid of them." And that's how he is.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.