Popular Posts

history in the making President Trump has officially now signed the "memorandum of understanding" which seems to be very misunderstood with Iran at the Versailles of all places. Now this multi-point performance is based, it's a base plan that now is in full effect and a formal signing we expect to take place in two days. Now here are the main takeaways. The Strait of Hormuz will be free, it will be clear there will be no tolls. Iran will never ever have a nuclear weapon. If they uphold the terms of this working memorandum, although it's not really relevant to what's been going on, Iran will be rewarded with sanctions relief. The choice ultimately will be theirs. If they break the terms, well, President Trump said it pretty well, very clear, unambiguous, hell will rain down on the IRGC. Take a look. "The only thing that really matters to me is Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. And it says it loud and clear, they're not going to develop it, they're not going to buy it, they're not going to do anything with it. And if they do, they suffer unbelievable consequences. They will not develop, purchase, buy or any other thing, they're not going to acquire a nuclear weapon. If they do, all hell will rain down on them." All hell will rain down on them. Now today, the president reiterated that commitment to blowing up Iran if in fact they do break the terms of this deal. He cannot be any more clear. Take a look. "I let him know. He said, 'Look, if you don't adhere to the agreement, I don't want to do that, but we're going to bomb the hell out of you. And I don't think that they're going to veer from the agreement. What else am I going to do? Am I going to say I'm going to take you to court? Let me take you to court. Let me sue you. No, we're going to bomb the hell out of them if they violate the agreement.'" Now I had a conversation with the president, I've talked to Steve Whitcoff, I've talked to others in the administration. There is so much more under the surface that has already been discussed in deep detail surrounding Iran and this working agreement. I see many people reacting to the memorandum itself that are completely ignoring those words of Donald Trump that he has no problem at all. He said it to me directly, going back and bombing any time he wants. And the guy, by the way, that wrote The Art of the Deal, well, he's been pretty clear where the red lines are. There's no ambiguity here. To me, his words are more impactful than any memorandum if you want to know what is in the president's head and what he's thinking. But anyway, he's a trust but verify guy anyway. So at the end of the day, if Iran doesn't comply, they have been told three times in two days what is to come. And it's not reconstruction. It's not one American taxpayer dollar. It's not sanctions relief that will, you know, that their country desperately needs. And hell will rain down from the sky. Who do you want to believe?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

So you're telling me I can get a foreign doctor without an American license to just check a box and I get a state mandated paid vacation to Somalia or any other country. Is that correct? That is how the law was written by Democrats in Minnesota, yes. This is going to stop and you folks are at the front of it. Minnesotans have had enough. We're hardworking people. We will not allow our tax scholars to go. Imagine this. Minnesota taxpayers funding a paid vacation to anywhere in the world for anyone who claims to be providing care for someone without ever having to prove it. No documentation, no verification, just a simple declaration. And what's more troubling? This is real. It's happening right now. The conversation started innocently enough with Representative Stauber questioning Representative Rarik about who could qualify for this paid family leave. Rarik's answer was a bombshell. It wasn't limited to close family members or dependents. It wasn't even limited to people living in the US. In fact, under the law, if you simply say you're taking care of someone, anyone, your employer is legally obligated to give you paid time off for up to 12 weeks. And here's the kicker, there's no requirement to prove any of it. No doctor's note, no check-ins, nothing. Someone could take off to Somalia, care for a friend, and get paid nearly 90% of their salary for it. Stauber's line of questioning exposed just how wide open this loophole is. Could an individual travel anywhere, even out of the country, and receive paid leave under this program? Absolutely. Could they choose any caregiver, including someone without American medical credentials? Yes. Could they get away with it without facing any consequences? You guessed it. There's nothing in place to hold anyone accountable. But then, Stauber pushed even harder. What if someone were to take their employer's word for it and not provide any proof? He asked. The response? They could. The law doesn't require proof of care, and no one would question it. The more Stauber dug, the more unsettling the truth became. People could get away with fraudulent claims that cost the taxpayers dearly, allowing them to travel the globe while still pocketing government funds. The situation became even more bizarre when the conversation turned to who could certify a person's need for care. Could it be someone outside of the US, without medical licenses? Yes, absolutely. It didn't have to be an American doctor. It could be a foreign practitioner with no professional standing in the US. The law's broad definitions leave the system open to exploitation. The fact that this could be happening under the state's watch without a shred of oversight has caused an uproar. Here's where the real tension arises. Minnesota lawmakers including

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A screenshot compiling a stack of seven verified X (Twitter) posts from different conservative-leaning accounts, each showing a profile picture, name, handle, a black "Follow" button, and a short text post advocating for building a White House ballroom, apparently in reaction to some unspecified recent event ("tonight's events"). The accounts shown, top to bottom, are: Bonchie (@bonchieredstate), ALX (@alx), Steve Guest (@SteveGuest), Brilyn Hollyhand (@BrilynHollyhand), Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug), Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok), and Tom Fitton (@TomFitton).

Text in image: Bonchie @bonchieredstate They can't articulate any logical reason the ballroom shouldn't be completed, so they are left with this flailing. ALX 🇺🇸 @alx Curious to see if legacy media reporters change their tune on the need for The White House Ballroom after tonight's events... Steve Guest @SteveGuest The ballroom can't be built fast enough. Brilyn Hollyhand @BrilynHollyhand When Democrats don't get their way, they get dangerous. Build the White House ballroom ASAP. Comfortably Smug @ComfortablySmug Throwing out a wild idea: What if they built a ballroom on the White House grounds that could be a safe and secure location for events with the President of the United States? Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok BUILD THE BALLROOM Tom Fitton @TomFitton Tonight is one more reason for the new White House Trump Ballroom...

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

We've proved now that there was direct access to the Antrim County Election Management System because we show on November 5th, we can see it in the forensic images, that an anonymous user logged onto the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the the database when they were trying to re-tabulate the election. So that's one huge, huge development because now we prove that the machines were remotely accessed and more importantly they were remotely accessed by an anonymous user who had elevated privileges in the system. That is pretty damning for the the non forensic reviewers out there, people who do not want a forensic audit. And the other thing probably is equally explosive. Everyone's seen ballots before like these ballots here. On the side of the ballot there's these black boxes, there's 59 black boxes on the side of the ballot. We now see within the forensic images that in Antrim County those blocks, blocks 15, 18, 28, 41 and 44 were all intentionally modified. The height and the width, the shape of those blocks were intentionally modified in order to generate errors. What does an error do? In this case by modifying those specific blocks they were able to cause rejections for Republican ballots. Meaning if you voted for Donald Trump and then put your ballot in the machine your ballot was rejected at a rate of 20% more than Joe Biden ballots.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

What's going to come out of this, John? What is your feeling on this one? So I've been on the same roller coaster you have, Glenn. You do lots of this great reporting. You try to help people. I've been in the White House declassifying documents. And you see this extraordinary body of evidence. And then you see the people implicated in that body of evidence walking free, thumbing their nose, going on television, making money, writing false letters that mislead Americans in elections. And you're like, is it worth even doing this? The answer, of course, it is. I have detected since the beginning of the White House task force a new sentiment in the Justice Department in the prosecutorial world. And I'll just use some examples. So our original releases at the task force were the basis for the president's July speech about China interventions in our election, including the theft of voter records, the fact that there were a lot of non-citizens on voter rolls and some appeared to have voted, and then the election vulnerabilities. Now, I can tell you from the work I've done that this has long been known in the government, but it had never gotten to the president's intention. In fact, there was an intentional effort by the intelligence world to keep two presidents and probably two congresses in the dark on this. The antiseptic of light kicked in a whole new sort of activity at the Justice Department. And I suspect it wasn't the Justice Department-- wasn't looking at it. It was probably the career people like, there's nothing going on there, nothing there, it's rare. It doesn't happen. All of a sudden, you've seen north of 100 non-citizens charged with voting. You got a major criminal investigation in New Jersey about maybe systemic non-citizens getting on the board. You've seen some new actions taken to protect our voting machines. The intelligence that we made public was six years old, but nobody ever acted on it until Donald Trump gave his speech. You heard the other day that John Brennan, in a court filing said he was told by prosecutors, he's a target. You only give someone a target notification if they're about to be indicted. I see an awful lot of activity in the grand jury talking to defense lawyers looking at activity and behavior by James Comey and his inner circle. I didn't see that activity for much of the last first 13 to 14 months of the Trump presidency, except in the FBI. The FBI was always churning. But it seems to me that the Justice Department is in a different gear. And that gear has been kicked in for different reasons. HSI takes on Ilhan Omar, separate of DOJ. They drive that case. The president's speech puts new evidence out there. I've seen more accountability, activity before grand juries and in courts in the last eight weeks. And I saw, quite frankly, in the first six years of the two Trump presidencies. So something is going on. But it only matters if you get results. And the result will be someone being charged if there is criminality, or being sued, or being charged with fraud, or having their job taken away. I think we're in a window now where we're going to finally know the answer. I don't know which one it will be. But there's enough activity that the Justice Department is probably going to give us some clarity. And certainly on election integrity, you're seeing things you've never seen before in the history of the Justice Department, not Trump. I mean, there have never been this many non-citizens prosecuted in the history of the Justice Department in one year. You've never seen a case like they're bringing in California, where the pay to play with the homeless people has blossomed into a very big scandal. And last night, while you and I were probably getting ready for bed, Glenn, the Justice Department did something really significant, something they could have done a year or two ago, but they did it. They told California, we see these many people that we think are non-citizens on the 26 voter rolls. You better get them off before election day, because if you allow them to cast the ballot, we're coming to charge you with knowingly and willfully letting a illegal alien vote or a non-citizen foreigner vote. And that's never been done before. That is a shock wave. That's activity we haven't seen in the past.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

[Music] Our undercover people arrived at the tail end of the protest that evening, including myself. Watchdog, how are you doing? What's going on? It's J. O'Connell. Watchdog. Hey, dude, hey. My fiance is a teacher. Hey, she, where's, what's your teeth? Oh. What's your teeth? Special needs. Where are we going? We're going to PFI. Where are we going? We're going to PFI, please. Don't you have a thank you party affair? Like this. [Screaming] We heard chants of "ice out" and "fuck ice." Ice out. Ice out. Fuck ice. Fuck ice. Fuck ice. Fuck ice. Fuck ice. Hopefully, the audience will forgive this reporter for participating in these chants in order to fit in. [Music] We found teachers, nurses, and union organizers all telling us we appreciate you, neighbor. I appreciate you, neighbor. I appreciate you, neighbor. A guy came by before and he stopped here. It was a bunch of young kids and they handed out weed to everybody. It was so cool. I gave all right away. All but a little bit because I wanted to at least try it. You got anything better than weed? Uh, love? Are you a paid agitator? I'm just kidding. While many, probably many of you, might think this is all due to some specific centralized funding source, what we found is a hodgepodge of various NGOs and non-profits loosely tied together through ideology, funded in part by the government, featuring 501(c)(3)s with non-profit tax returns, a variety of funding sources. But most of these people we found were actually true believers there to live and die by their cause. Why did you send them out? Yeah, it's a very, um, independent association, very national association. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. This woman, featured on a hidden camera, is Peggy Wang. Based in Boston, she works at Massachusetts College of Art and Design, active in the Massachusetts Teachers Association. She participates in pro-Palestinian protests, and her job is currently being threatened for doing so. While this footage is hard to hear, Peggy Wang lists the issues that her organization gets involved in. Immigration rights, abolishing ICE, stopping raids and deportations, justice for victims, and getting ICE out of cities like Minneapolis. I'd like to thank you for joining us today. Our union definitely needs to take a step by to get an ICE request from yourselves. How are you doing? I'm good, how are you doing? We're also talking about the preproductive rights in her home care. We're talking about the labor work department. We need a real political representation for working people, so we have a working class party. Oh, okay. Is this a party? We're an organization, independent socialist group. This other protester, we secretly recorded, talks about an organization called Make the Road New York. We've never heard of this organization, but apparently they have a budget of $30 million. They talk about one of the speakers that spoke earlier that day, April Verretti. April is the president of the SEIU labor union. I mean, if you're interested in an immigrant rights organization, you should look up Make the Road New York. Make the Road New York. Make the Road New York. But who are you with? I'm just with the, I'm with the union. Oh! SEIU service employees and credentials. We looked at the tax returns of Make the Road New York and found there were registered 501(c)(3) that file a 990, and they received $16 million in grants. Ice out! Fuck ice! We love our neighbors! As cars drove by, the agitators would ride on top of the cars. One man's spoiler was broken off his car as one agitator tried to climb on board the car. What happened? He accidentally broke his wing on his car. One of the comments they made was, there's no blood here, and you know there's no Trump people, there's no MAGA people, because if there was, there would be blood. The advantages of it being so cold is we were able to cover every single part of our skin, but these conditions were truly dangerous. Many of our DSLR cameras actually froze, our hidden cameras malfunctioned in minutes because it was so cold. And we watched water freeze in seconds. A bottle of water could quickly be turned into a weapon. Negative 17 degree weather. Let's see what happens to water. Let's see how fast that freezes. One, two, three. It's already frozen.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A screenshot of a tweet/post from a verified account named "@Paeonia" (handle @MaximusPaeonia), whose profile picture shows a peony flower. The post is addressed to @SenMikeLee and mentions @POTUS, referencing a claim of a stolen election. The post is timestamped 6:49 AM · Apr 17, 2026, with 128 views shown.

Text in image: @Paeonia [verified checkmark] @MaximusPaeonia @SenMikeLee, in hindsight, if they hadn't stolen the election and @POTUS didn't fight back, voting would be the least of our concerns. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT 6:49 AM · Apr 17, 2026 · 128 Views

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A screenshot of a social media post (X/Twitter) from an account named "Geo the Zoomerbaptist" (@GeoChonker), whose profile picture is a cartoon avatar of a bald man with a beard, and whose display name is followed by a cross emoji, a US flag emoji, a cowboy hat emoji, and a blue verified checkmark. The post text is above an embedded county-level map of the contiguous United States plus Alaska. Nearly the entire map is shaded deep red (indicating heavy Republican/"R" margins), with only a single small blue county visible in South Dakota and a few faint lighter-red or pink counties scattered elsewhere. A legend at the bottom of the map runs from "R +60" (dark red) through lighter reds, pale pinks, pale blues, blues, to "D +60," alongside separate green and yellow swatches labeled "3rd win by party." The post is timestamped 12:20 AM · Jun 12, 2026, with 327.8K views listed.

Text in image: Geo the Zoomerbaptist ✝️🇺🇸🤠✅ @GeoChonker 2024 Election if only people who listed their ancestry as "American" voted R +60 [gradient swatches] D +60 [green] [yellow] 3rd win by party 12:20 AM · Jun 12, 2026 · 327.8K Views

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

So tell me if I have my legal bearings correct here. The president has immunity for his actions while president, not afterwards or not before, but while president. Somebody like Joe Biden does not have immunity and he was involved in this. Somebody like Hillary Clinton, of course, does not have immunity. She was never president, never will be. So you could see potentially some very big names brought down in this. Is that correct, Mike? Yes. And presidential immunity applies to your official acts. If you investigate Barack Obama, he can litigate whether it is an official act for him to set loose the Democrat National Committee, the Steele dossier, to work with his Justice Department, with his FBI, with the CIA to orchestrate the biggest scandal in American history, to use your law enforcement and intel agencies to help a presidential candidate of Hillary Clinton and hurt a presidential campaign of Donald Trump. And that's exactly what they did. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Clapper, Brennan. There were so many bad actors in this. And the law fair against President Trump to take him out afterwards with the prosecutions, poor prosecutions for non-crime. Non-crime is trying to bankrupt Trump for non-fraud several times, trying to take him off the ballot unconstitutionally. And several states tried to take off his head by underfunding a secret service protection. And Biden saying Trump was a fascist and the gravest threat to democracy and to put a bullseye on. These law fair Democrats must be held accountable. So this never happens again. If they're not held accountable, it's going to be very ugly the next time they're back in the White House and they run the Justice Department and the CIA. So, hold on, Mike. I have to dig down on that answer. So you're telling me that Barack Obama's actions, even as president, if they were illegal, it could still be charged. So Barack Obama could potentially be charged here as well? Presidential immunity is an affirmative defense. You can charge him, even charge him as an unindicted co-conspirator. I'd charge him, but I'm a little bit more bold and fearless than most. But then you let Barack Obama litigate whether he has presidential immunity. Barack Obama is the most demonic force in American politics in decades. He is an evil man who is a Marxist Trojan horse who was the worst actor in politicizing and weaponizing our intelligences and law enforcement to go after your political enemies. This guy is a fraud. He is a Marxist, and he is subversive. He's the Trojan horse for the Marxists. And he absolutely was and is trying to destroy America from within. He tried to create so many racial grievances, racial tensions, sicking the intel agencies and the FBI, the Justice Department, after your political enemies. monster and he has to be held accountable.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.