Popular Posts

This is one of the many reasons that the left freaks out every time Marco Rubio speaks. - One of the things I see a lot in South Florida are people that have been in this country. They mainly came from Cuba 45 years ago. They've worked here their entire lives. They retire. They get $800, $1,000 a month in Social Security. And then they run into somebody who just got here from Cuba three months ago, 29 years old, doesn't work, and is given $1,500 a month in benefits by our government 'cause they're refugees. A year later is traveling back to Cuba 15 times. So you're a refugee fleeing oppression from a place that you now go back and visit 15 times the following year. And in the meantime, we're giving you Medicaid, food stamps, healthcare for your children, cash payments from the refugee fund. So imagine if you've been working here for 40 years and your Social Security check is smaller than the benefits going to a 28-year-old, able-bodied person who just got here. That's real. That happens. That's happening every day. That makes no sense.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

Hello, Ohio. One of my very favorite places. This November, I'm asking you to get out and knock doors, volunteer and vote, vote, vote for John Euston. He's a great guy. He's a fantastic man, respected by everybody in Washington and Ohio, to be the United States Senator from Ohio. He's going to be great. John Euston is a patriot who has devoted his entire life to Ohio. He's been there right from the beginning and he's now fighting for you and working very hard in the U.S. Senate. He's your senator and he's a great one. John was a critical vote in passing the largest tax cuts in American history, achieving the most secure border in history, delivering the largest drop in violent crime in American history and unleashing the greatest influx of jobs and investment in the history of the world. No country has ever done better than we're doing right now. John is running against a radical left lunatic named Sherrod Brown, who was left out in Washington for years when he was there. Nobody respected him. He wasn't a hard worker. He had nothing going. He betrayed the people of Ohio and the Senate for years. That's why a man named Marino went in and beat him the last time and now we're going to have a man named Euston beat him. But Sherrod Brown voted in favor of men in women's sports. He voted in favor of deadly sanctuary cities and he voted for the Biden agenda that gave you the highest levels of inflation in 48 years. He also voted for open borders and all of the other disasters that you had, including a thing called transgender for everybody. That's Sherrod Brown. He was a very bad Senator and he will not be any better this way. Don't let him claw his way back in. On November 3rd, go out and vote for John Euston for United States Senate. He will never let you down. He's in there now and he's one of the most respected people in all of Washington. Thank you very much.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

now has a margin of 118,838 votes and you're saying there's 100,000 left. If he's being literal sometimes 100,000, they're getting calls from counties and they say 20,000 it's really 22,000 it could be 33. John, can I just jump in? Yes please. Actually we asked about how do you know these numbers and actually by law they have to have it, the actual numbers. So I understand your point but I think they do have more precise numbers based on what the law requires. Interesting. That math says a shock way through the Harris campaign. That is literal even if she won them all. If there's 100,000 left and she won them all and she won't, he's 118,000. She said marginally for Harris which means probably 53, 47 or something along those lines. Interesting we'll have the decision desk talk to the people in Georgia. Can I go back to Pennsylvania for one second?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A political polling graphic titled "INDIANA – SD 38 / Republican Primary Polling," styled as a campaign infographic with a red banner (background pattern of "TRUMP 2024" signs) at top and a dark blue subtitle bar. It presents two side-by-side bar charts comparing a Republican primary matchup between incumbent Greg Goode and challenger Brenda Wilson (each bar topped with a circular headshot photo). The left chart, labeled "CURRENT POLLING / INCUMBENT +25%," shows Goode at 39%, Wilson at 14%, and Undecided at 46%. The right chart, labeled "POLLING IF TRUMP ENDORSES / CHALLENGER +39%" with a circular photo of Donald Trump above it, shows Goode dropping to 20%, Wilson rising to 59%, and Undecided at 21%. Below each chart is a data table citing pollster "Fabrizio, Lee & Associates," dated 1/6 - 1/8, 2026, with the same numbers and a "Spread" column reading "Goode +25" on the left and "Wilson +39" on the right.

Text in image: INDIANA – SD 38 Republican Primary Polling CURRENT POLLING INCUMBENT +25% POLLING IF TRUMP ENDORSES CHALLENGER +39% 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 39% 14% 46% Greg Goode Brenda Wilson Undecided 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 20% 59% 21% Greg Goode Brenda Wilson Undecided Pollster: Fabrizio, Lee & Associates Date: 1/6 - 1/8, 2026 Goode: 39 | Wilson: 14 | Undecided: 46 Spread: Goode +25 Pollster: Fabrizio, Lee & Associates Date: 1/6 - 1/8, 2026 Goode: 20 | Wilson: 59 | Undecided: 21 Spread: Wilson +39

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

but take a look, June 19th, a male, blue shirt, reaches in, stays there for a little while. He goes back down, comes back up multiple times. What's he doing? Then a female, white tote bag, she reaches in, needs a better angle, sets the bag down, dives in a little deeper. And we don't know who these people are. No one was stopped or questioned by police, so no arrests. And we don't have the police report yet. But what are they doing with their hands in the pool? Are they cutting the lining? Are they peeling off the paint? And we don't know if they're committing a crime. They'll probably tell you they dropped their wedding ring. The Department of Interior says this, quote, "In the video, you're seeing two suspects observe destroying and removing a piece of the lining and attempting destruction of the lining. This incident took place on June 19th, 2026, and we are investigating. Destroying, injuring, defacing or removing cultural or architectural resources is a federal crime." The Department of Interior says the Department of Interior

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A meme image showing a photograph of an older man in a white polo shirt, navy shorts, blue baseball cap, and white sneakers, bent over on a golf course while addressing or hitting a golf ball with a club near a divot/turf clump on the fairway. Above the photo is a bold black caption on a white background mocking his golf ability by comparing it to a golf handicap.

Text in image: Biden isn't even a 100 Handicap

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A screenshot of a tweet/post from Narendra Modi (verified account, @narendramodi), showing his profile picture (an older man with white hair and beard, wearing a dark jacket). The post text thanks President Trump and expresses hope to advance the India-US strategic partnership, tagging @POTUS and @realDonaldTrump.

Text in image: Narendra Modi ✓ @narendramodi Thank you, President Trump, for your warm wishes. I look forward to working with you to further advance the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership, for the benefit of both our nations and the world. @POTUS @realDonaldTrump

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A political campaign graphic with a blue-to-red gradient background and a white border. It shows a close-up photo of Donald Trump (serious/stern expression, wearing a dark suit and blue tie) on the left and a photo of a smiling woman with long brown wavy hair wearing a pink blazer and a dragonfly necklace on the right. At the bottom center is a "TRUMP VANCE / MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" campaign logo with stars.

Text in image: FLORIDA STATE REPRESENTATIVE (FL-HD-94) MEG WEINBERGER WINS! ENDORSED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP! TRUMP VANCE MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! ★★★★★

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A political campaign graphic with a dark blue-to-red gradient background and a thin white border frame. Large white bold text at top announces a congressional election win, with a red banner beneath noting a presidential endorsement. Below the text are two head-and-shoulders photos side by side: on the left, a close-up cropped photo of a man with blond/orange hair and a serious, scowling expression, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, and blue tie; on the right, an older man with gray hair, dark-framed round glasses, wearing a navy suit, light blue shirt, and a striped red tie with a small congressional pin on his lapel, smiling. At the bottom center is a "TRUMP VANCE" campaign logo with stars above and the slogan "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" below it.

Text in image: CONGRESSMAN (MI-05) TIM WALBERG WINS! ENDORSED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP! TRUMP VANCE MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A political campaign graphic on a blue-to-red gradient background. It announces "Carrie Buck" as the Republican nominee winner for Nevada's 1st congressional district (NV-01), noting the endorsement by President Trump. Below the text are photos of two people: on the left, a man with light blond/gray combed-back hair, orange-toned skin, a stern/frowning expression, wearing a dark suit and blue tie (resembling Donald Trump); on the right, a smiling woman with long dark wavy hair wearing a red blazer over a white top. At the bottom center is a "TRUMP VANCE" campaign logo with stars and the tagline "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"

Text in image: REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR NV-01 CARRIE BUCK WINS! ENDORSED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP! TRUMP VANCE MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

We saw numerous examples of numbers moving numbers being flipped and switched as you realize the Antrim County is where the 6000 vote glitch occurred an error rate is permissible for one out of 125,000 ballots and if you look at just what happened in Antrim County the error rate was 8.3 so which puts it about seven 750 times the allowable limit and according to the regulations that should have disqualified. I don't know if challenge is the right word but we need you to move forward but we will separate out and count those and there's going to be an asterisk saying these ballots have the same thing and again we know that you have a concern with this precinct and when you get done with the audit part of it not an investigation we have 7,769 votes for Biden and then for Trump 4,509 votes but that was wrong and here are the actual results Trump significant margin over Joe Biden first they said I believe this is a human error then they said it was a mechanical error then they said it was a human error what happened well what happened was the the machine is designed to generate huge numbers of errors when you run ballots through the tabulator and then those ballots those errors go to adjudication where someone's sitting somewhere we don't know where can simply click on one button and bulk adjudicate thousands of ballots at once so in this case they were able to adjudicate someone was 12,000 ballots roughly with one click of the button okay and that's not good adjudication and the rate of ballots that were being adjudicated ie it goes through the machine something doesn't look right a human being has to take it and do something with it what was the rate of ballots that needed to be adjudicated 68% of the ballots run through the machine or had to be adjudicated and tell us just how crazy off the wall that number is or isn't it seems kind of high it's very high because the the federal allowable rate is one in 125,000 ballots that's the error rate and this program is designed specifically to generate these types of errors and that's how they move votes from one candidate to another they put them in these folders for mass adjudication and they are shipped somewhere in our case specifically as you see in the report we can't tell that right now because on November 4th all of those system files adjudication files and internet files were deleted so that's pretty significant is what we found another thing that we found very disturbing and this there's a adjudication process that probably I know you're probably familiar with people if there is a mark that is questionable the ballot should be sent to an adjudication holding area to be resolved manually manually by a three-person team well that's the way the system normally works however what the batch log say is that all of the ballots were sent to adjudication all virtually all of the ballots now adjudication only applies to mail-in ballots so virtually all of the mail-in ballots which was approximately 148,000 were forced into adjudication unnecessarily and that's where they incur that extra risk of manipulation what we're concerned about is that the electronic manipulation that can take place in adjudication not necessarily the manual adjudication even though that is typically biased Wow a hundred more again let me emphasize this and get it correct a hundred and forty eight thousand were forced to adjudication right and the elections director actually admitted this on November 5th at a 5 p.m. press conference and he said that at that time of a hundred and thirteen thousand ballots 106,000 had gone to adjudication and we were saying what how can that possibly be and now we know it's because the logs were set to force them into adjudication because we don't have the counts and we can't move forward and we understand that there is a concern with this precinct but this is not a time for you to be investigated right now so you need to move forward with the audit so we can get the numbers so we can see how many ballots are here I don't know if challenge is the right word but we'll separate out and count those and there's going to be an asterisk saying these ballots are the same and again we know that you have a concern with this precinct and when you get done with the audit part of it not an investigation not counting it's not that's not your rule right now this very minute so what I need you to do is complete the audit so we can get a number of how many ballots were in this and when you start accounting and we can move forward from there okay so what I what I need for you guys to do right now is to finish the audit process not the process right now the process right now is for you to put them in the piles where they belong for the presidential vote they count the presidential laws I we understand that there is possibly an issue with this precinct we understand that but what I need for you to do right now is to finish the presidential race audit not separate them out and then we'll move forward from there okay but I need you to continue the process right now I understand but until we get it out we need that piece done first we need the audit piece done first because that's why we're here and we will look at the numbers okay and I understand that there may be an issue and I understand your concerns so we can complete the audit piece right now those key elements that that showed differences in the data the data runs and the tapes and I believe I've provided that to you as well and then a declaration by Robert March the marsh the star township supervisor a couple of the excerpts when he said upon examining the tape at the close of the polls I could see that President Trump had clearly won the presidential race and star township he said I believe the numbers were 462 for President Trump with Joe Biden receiving 161 votes normally when a candidate has such a large lead it's safe to assume who the winner would be early next morning my right my wife received a phone call from a friend asking what happened to Antrim County going blue meaning Democrat at 736 that morning I was texting our stats representative Tristan Cole to find out if those are the actual results at the time Tristan advised me that the numbers were not right that Antrim County was reporting 462 votes had been credited Joe Biden and President Trump had only received 10 votes so we saw it numerous examples of numbers moving numbers being flipped and switched as you realize the Antrim County is where the 6,000 vote glitch occurred and if you look at the the numerous references and the the guidelines for elections and the help them help America vote act the Federal Election Commission voting system standards and the Federal Information Security Modernization Act an error rate is permissible for one out of 125,000 ballots and if you look at just what happened in Antrim County the error rate was 8.3 so which puts it about seven 750 times the allowable limit and according to the regulations that should have disqualified they went later and changed that from a glitch to a clerical error which you know they kind of changed up changed up the reporting on that a little bit

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was that it had to be first-hand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use second-hand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable by the inspector general. Why was that standard changed? This is something that, again, there's further lies being told in the transcripts of this former inspector general Atkinson when he went and testified before the House Intelligence Committee, where he was directly asked this question that you're asking here now. And he's making claims, oh, well, the law required me to do it. That's complete nonsense. The law did not require him to do it. The responsibility is with the inspector general to deem whether or not a complaint is credible and whether or not it is urgent. How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case, and when the inspector general himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations. And so it was obviously, to me, part of this plot to change the standard, which the inspector general did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

credibility is nowhere to be found. She is accused a babysitter's boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief Les Moonves of either sexually assaulting or raping her in the past.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A news photograph taken outside the White House, likely at a South Portico or Rose Garden entrance decorated with American flags and large red Chinese-style banners. In the foreground, out of focus, a row of U.S. Marine Corps ceremonial guards in dress blue uniforms with white gloves and peaked caps march in formation carrying rifles. In the background, standing on the steps and in focus, are four people: a man saluting (resembling Donald Trump) in a dark suit and red tie; to his left an older Asian man in a dark suit (resembling Chinese President Xi Jinping); further left a woman in a dark blazer (resembling Peng Liyuan); and to the right a blonde woman in a black buttoned coat (resembling Melania Trump). The scene appears to be a military honor guard ceremony during a state visit.

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A political campaign graphic with a blue-to-red gradient background. It shows a serious/scowling photo of Donald Trump on the left and a smiling headshot of a man in a dark suit with a red tie on the right (identified in the text as Congressman David Kustoff). At the bottom center is a "TRUMP VANCE" campaign logo with stars and the slogan "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" A small circular emblem appears in the bottom right corner.

Text in image: CONGRESSMAN (TN-08) DAVID KUSTOFF WINS! ENDORSED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP! TRUMP VANCE ★★★★★ MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! ★★★★★

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A news photograph of two men in dark navy suits with red ties walking together outdoors on a paved area decorated with large white star and stripe/circle markings (resembling a stylized flag or seal pattern), with a patch of green grass in the lower left corner. The man on the left has gray hair and is walking with hands clasped; he resembles Chinese President Xi Jinping. The man in the center, who resembles Donald Trump, has light/blond hair and is gesturing with his right hand while speaking, pointing toward the other man. Behind them to the right, a younger Asian man in a navy suit, light blue shirt, and diamond-patterned tie is smiling and carrying papers/a notepad. Another partially visible man in a dark suit is in the background on the left. There is no text overlaid on the image.

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

Where do I even begin with this? So, let's start here. Nobody has done more to rebuild and save the Republican Party than Donald Trump since Abraham Lincoln himself. President Trump inherited a broken shell, a hollowed-out husk of a political party after the Bush years, after the Ryan years, after the sellout years, and he turned it into the working-class party, the middle-class party. And he took states that had been blue forever. He took the blue wall. He took states like Wisconsin, states like Ohio, states like Pennsylvania. He pulverized that blue wall. How many Senate races have we seen? Were President Trump won a state by eight points, nine points, 10 points, 11 points? And it was just enough to bring along the Republican senator by half a point or a point to build that Senate Republican majority. How many Senate candidates has he dragged along to victory? And how many rhinos has he forced out of the party to elect real, working-class, populist Republicans, people like, for example, Eric Schmidt, who represent the future of the Republican Party, where it is today? President Trump has raised more money for Republican candidates than any human in history. He has more enthusiasm and support from Republican voters than any candidate in history. I could keep going, Laura. The reality is, as he said, President Trump is dead on right here. What this comes down to is the Trump voter needs to show up in the midterm.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A screenshot/graphic attributed to Stephen Moore, framed with italic captions reading "From Stephen Moore" and "Shows inflation running at half the Biden rate." Below is a line chart titled "CPI Growth Since Taking Office," with the x-axis "Months in Office" (0-48) and y-axis "CPI Growth Percent" (0-22). Three lines are plotted: a red "Trump 1st Term" line, a blue "Under Biden/Harris" line, and a red "Trump 2nd Term" line (both Trump terms shown in red). The blue Biden/Harris line rises steepest, reaching about 21% by month 48, with a callout box noting "11.7% Inflation Biden" at roughly month 16-17. The Trump 2nd Term line is annotated "5.5% Inflation Trump Term2" at a similar early point, tracking noticeably lower than the Biden line at the same number of months. Another callout reads "3.6% Inflation Trump Term 1" pointing to the Trump 1st Term red line, which stays flat around 6-8% through 48 months.

Text in image: From Stephen Moore Shows inflation running at half the Biden rate CPI Growth Since Taking Office Trump 1st Term Under Biden/Harris Trump 2nd Term 11.7% Inflation Biden 5.5% Inflation Trump Term2 3.6% Inflation Trump Term 1 CPI Growth Percent 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 Months in Office

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

[wind howling]

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A screenshot from a Fox News broadcast, "The Will Cain Show," marked LIVE. A man in a dark suit and blue striped tie stands to the left of a large graphic titled "U.S. HOUSEHOLD INCOME AT RECORD HIGH." The graphic shows a line chart labeled "MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, U.S. DOLLARS, 1967-2025," with the y-axis ranging from $50k to $90k and the x-axis showing years from 1980 to 2025. The line trends generally upward over time, with a notable dip and recovery in the most recent years shown, reaching close to $90k by 2025. The source "U.S. CENSUS BUREAU" is credited below the chart. A partial bar chart with percentage values (30%, 25%, 20%, etc.) is visible on the far left edge of the screen. The Fox News logo appears in the bottom left corner along with a timestamp "2:05 MT."

Text in image: LIVE U.S. HOUSEHOLD INCOME AT RECORD HIGH MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, U.S. DOLLARS, 1967-2025 $90k $80k $70k $60k $50k 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 U.S. CENSUS BUREAU FOX NEWS 2:05 MT THE WILL CAIN SHOW 30% 25 20 15 10 5 -5 -10 2.0

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

A political meme with a bold black caption reading "Same Guy. Even more energy now!" above a composited image. On the left, a digitally aged/de-aged portrait shows a young man in a formal military-style academy uniform with epaulettes, medals, and a sash, seated at a round wooden table against a brown curtain backdrop. On the right, an older man resembling Donald Trump (dark suit, white shirt, red tie, blonde/orange hair) sits at the same table, chin resting on folded hands, looking toward the younger figure. The image is composited/edited to depict the same person at two different ages sitting across from each other at the same table and backdrop, implying a "then and now" comparison.

Text in image: Same Guy. Even more energy now!

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.