Popular Posts

Good morning director if you'll let me quickly summarize your opening statement this morning You said in volume one on the issue of conspiracy the special counsel Determined that the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign Conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities and then in volume two For reasons that you explained the special counsel did not make a determination On whether there was an obstruction of justice crime committed by the president. Is that fair? Yes, sir All right now in explaining the special counsel did not make what you called a traditional prosecution or declination decision The report on the bottom of page two of volume two reads as follows The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from Conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred accordingly while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime It also does not exonerate him the special counsel's job. Nowhere does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald Trump's innocence Or that the special counsel report should determine whether or not to exonerate him. It's not in any of the documents It's not in your appointment order. It's not in the special counsel regulations. It's not in the OLC opinions It's not in the Justice Manual and it's not in the principles of federal prosecution Nowhere do those words appear together because respectfully respectfully director It was not the special counsel's job to conclusively determine Donald Trump's innocence or to exonerate him Because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence It exists for everyone. Everyone is entitled to it including sitting presidents and because there is a presumption of innocence prosecutors never ever Need to conclusively determine it now director the special counsel applied This inverted burden of proof that I can't find and you said doesn't exist anywhere in the department policies and you used it to write a report and the very first line of Your report the very first line of your report says and you as you read this morning It authorizes a special counsel to provide the attorney general with a confidential report Explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the special counsel. That's the very first word of your report, right? That's correct Here's the problem director. The special counsel didn't do that on Volume 2 with respect to potential of obstruction of justice the special counsel made neither a prosecution Decision or a declination decision. You made no decision You told us this morning and in your report that you made no determination. So respectfully director You didn't follow the special counsel regulations. It clearly says Write a confidential report about decisions reached nowhere in here Does it say write a report about decisions that weren't reached you wrote 180 pages? 180 pages about decisions that weren't reached about potential crimes that weren't charged or decided and respectfully Respectfully by doing that you managed to violate every principle and the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that aren't charged so Americans need to know this as they listen to the Democrats and socialists on the other side of the aisle as they do dramatic readings from This report that volume two of this report was not authorized Under the law to be written It was written to a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department and it was written in violation of every DOJ principle About extra prosecutorial commentary. I agree with the chairman this morning when he said Donald Trump is not above the law He's not but he damn sure shouldn't be below the law

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

This is our movement, this is our moment, this is our time, and this is our president. Please help me welcome everyone's favorite president. [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music] [music]

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

The coalition nightmare continues to cost the average American family $1,100 every single month. $1,100. Again, government numbers.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

businesses. As president, my policy will be to maximum -- it's going to be maximum energy production to achieve low prices and make the United States into a -- really a manufacturing -- I want to be a manufacturing powerhouse. We're going to be more powerful than ever before. You know, AI is a new industry and it's a very big one, and I don't know, it's got some interesting difficulties, but China wants it and other countries want it and we've got to be there. But you know, in order to be able to compete with China or compete even with anybody with AI, we have to make double the electricity that we have right now. So take all of the electricity we have. We have to make -- we have to double it up just for that one very big industry. It could be very big, but it needs unbelievable amounts of electricity. I will cut the price of energy and electricity in half. Ready? 12 months from January 20th to take office on January 20th, your electric bill, including cars, air conditioners, heating, everything, your total electric bill will be 50, 5-0, 50% less. We're going to cut it in half. And we have it. We have the power to do it because we have it. We don't need ships. We don't need long train. We have everything. We're going to have to build some pipelines because we can't transport it. But that's easy to do, and that's safer than trains. But we're going to get this done, and you're going to have -- within one year -- think of it -- within one year, you're going to have electric bills and energy bills and your gasoline for your car is going to be 5-0, 50% cheaper than it is right now. That's a big thing. That's a big thing. So we will seriously expedite our environmental approvals. I will expedite them. If I have to, I'll just approve them, and approve them, because they use that -- you know, they use the environmental approvals to stop progress and quickly double our electricity capacity, and we're going to have it doubled and tripled. This will drive down inflation and make America and Michigan the best place on Earth to build a factory.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

It's official Joe Biden mishandled classified documents and now his two-tier justice system is on full display. The Department of Justice found Joe retained and disclosed classified documents, including matters of national security and intelligence sources and methods. He put America's national security at risk and then lied about it. I did not share classified information. I did not share. And after all that, Biden's special counsel still declined to indict him because he was an elderly man with a poor memory and diminished faculties who didn't even remember when he was vice president. Joe Biden, unfit to stand trial, unfit to lead America.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A graphic with a white background. Large bold black text at the top reads "This Man is Our National Security", with the word "is" underlined. Below the text is a formal portrait photo of an older man with light blond-gray swept hair, a stern, frowning expression, and a direct gaze at the camera. He wears a navy suit, white shirt, bright blue tie, and a small American flag lapel pin. An American flag and a dark ornate background are behind him. The image makes a statement-style claim presenting the pictured man as the nation's national security. No name appears in the image.

Text in image: This Man is Our National Security

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

My financial statements were extremely undervalued, as opposed to overvalued, which totally disproves and nullifies the New York State Attorney General's politically biased and motivated fake lawsuit against me. She said, "I will get Trump, I will get Trump." In other words, I am worth billions of dollars more than is shown on my very conservative financial statements, the exact opposite of what the AG Witch Hunt said. In addition to that, I have a 100% disclaimer and non-reliance clause right up front on page one, stating clearly that the user must do their own analysis and due diligence. That's what the bank stated they did in court. They didn't rely on the statement. If they did, that would be okay, but they have a non-disturbance clause. They have a non-reliance clause. They were paid in full, on time, on schedule. They loved me as a client. They said so. They got their money back. There were no victims, only success and only profits, and hopefully Judge Ngorin, who should have never had this non-jury trial, and should have never been allowed to go this far, or should have really dismissed it long ago, will show that the New York State judicial system is alive, respected, and well. Everyone's watching. Businesses don't want to move back into New York anymore. So I just say, God bless New York and God bless America.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

-This is the final battle. With you at my side, we will demolish the deep state. We will expel the warmongers from our government. We will drive out the globalists. We will cast out the Communists, Marxists, and Fashions. We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country. We will rout the fake news media, and we will liberate America from these villains once and for all. -[ Knocking ]

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

(crowd cheering) - Keep it going, keep it going! (crowd cheering) - You're listening!

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

I understand candidates that are losing by 57 to 70 points are getting together with Rhino Paul Ryan, Mitt the loser Romney, Bill "no guts" or "no talent" Barr, and some broken political investors that will soon come to me, as most others already have. These failed candidates should have started by campaigning effectively, which they didn't because they really don't have the skill or the talent to do so. Romney, who today couldn't get elected dog catcher in the great state of Utah, should have beaten and absolutely failed first term Obama. Should have beaten him very easily. If he and Rhino Paul fought as hard against Obama as they do against President Donald J. Trump, they would never have lost. They would have beaten Obama. But remember, Republicans eat their young. They really do. They eat their young. Terrible statement, but it's true. And that's the problem with so many in our party. They just don't have the loyalty and the strength to stick together. They go after people who are on their side rather than the radical left Democrats that are destroying our country. These people are losers and the Republican nation must stop following their failed ideas and policies. They only help the worst president in the history of the United States, the most corrupt president, the most incompetent president, crooked Joe Biden. We don't want to help him. We have to get him out of office. The Republican Party should unify and they should unify fast. We need Joe Biden out of there. He's destroying America. Thank you very much.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

We want Trump, we want Trump, we want Trump, we want Trump, we want Trump.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.