Popular Posts

-The president doesn't have immunity. He or she will be nothing more than a ceremonial president, rarely having the courage to do what has to be done for our country and to make our country great again. This is not what the founders had in mind at all. This is not what they wanted to think about. This is not where they wanted us to be. The founders wanted the president to have immunity, so the president can feel free to make decisions. Hopefully, they'll be great decisions, but whether they are or not, a president of the United States has to have immunity. Thank you.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A digitally created/AI-generated graphic. At the top is a white banner with the bold black word "DronePort". Below it is an official-looking White House seal (oval logo with an illustration of the White House building, text "THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON") in the upper left corner, overlaid on a nighttime aerial image of a flat rooftop resembling the White House roof. The rooftop, marked with painted circular landing pads, holds numerous military-style fixed-wing drones/aircraft arranged in a symmetrical pattern, each surrounded by red and blue emergency-style lights. Uniformed soldiers in camouflage stand at intervals around the drones on the rooftop. In the background is the Washington Monument obelisk, several American flags, city buildings, and multiple bursts of colorful fireworks (red, blue, white) lighting up the dusk/night sky.

Text in image: DronePort THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

healthcare system, making sure that we're able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I've been able to do with the COVID, excuse me, with dealing with everything we have to do with, look, if we finally beat Medicare.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

>> Vitanomics is working. >> Five minutes later. >> Breaking news right now, the Dow Jones is down about 1,010 points. >> And Vitanomics is working. >> It's working. >> Markets around the globe this morning are selling off. Overnight, Japan's Nikkei plunged 12 percent. It's worst day since the 1987 Black Monday crash. >> Vitanomics, it's working. >> This is heavy. Microsoft is down 20 bucks, that's 5 percent. Alphabet, 5 percent. Meta, 6 percent. Amazon, 6 percent. Apple, 9 percent down. >> And Vitanomics is working. >> Our plummet is fueling fears of recession amid a global market meltdown. >> The unemployment rate jumped to 4.3 percent. It just doesn't usually happen in a healthy economy. A rise like that is historically a sign that a recession is imminent. >> Vitanomics is working. >> It's working.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

When climate change is flooding our streets, poisoning our air, driving up health care and disaster costs, how can the EPA justify abandoning that duty to protect Americans to appease polluters under the false flag of economic growth? Following the law, section 202 of the Clean Air Act, where does this say anything about fighting global climate change? Loperbrite, Supreme Court case, you're familiar with it? No, maybe others are. I'm not, but let me ask-- But that's really important, as a member of Congress, Loperbrite says that we, as an agency, don't have the authority to get creative. If section 202 of the Clean Air Act-- No, but you don't have-- excuse me. You do not have the right to say climate change does not exist, that it's a hoax, and that's where this administration is coming from. I understand you're upset that you don't know what Loperbrite is. Do you know what the major policies doctrine is? I'm upset because-- Do you know what the major policies doctrine is? You're a member of Congress. You should know. You have moved from someone who defended the environment to all of a sudden-- You're very defensive about not knowing the two biggest landmark Supreme Court cases of the last year-- And you are very-- --with regards to your question. --you are very defensive about changing your policy and your positions with regard to the environment. Now, do just tell-- Do you want me to tell you what the two biggest Supreme Court cases are of the last few years? This is what I want you to tell me. Michigan versus EPA. Whoa. West Virginia versus EPA. You're here because you need money from us. So halt for the second. And wait for the questions. And answer the question. Well, I answered your question. And you didn't like my answer because you don't know what Loperbrite is. Because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is. Because you're asking me-- you're asking about Section 202 of the Clean Air Act. And you don't read it. You don't know what it says. Listen, and what you want to do is to deny-- No, I actually read the law. I do my homework. Really? You're just somebody who likes to have the microphone on. You know what I have to do? I read the law. I read the Supreme Court cases. And I would say that-- No, we should do it for your constituents is actually read statute. My budget is at real risk. Read your Supreme Court. This is the Appropriations Committee. Oh, you're-- you're going to-- You care about science. Now you're threatening to defund it. Oh my god. No, you don't fund science. Because you don't know what Loperbrite is. Because you don't know what the major policies doctrine is. Your message to our folks at the EPA is that you wanted to fund us. I don't have to listen to this BS. The BS? You think I made up these cases? Yeah, I think you have made up a whole lot of these cases. I made up Loperbrite. I made up West Virginia versus EPA. I made up Michigan versus EPA. Woe is right. What are you doing? Why are you helping polluters?

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

I mean, the Trump team is right. The Supreme Court's made clear if there's an open immunity issue, that needs to be litigated before anything else happens. And there's no good law enforcement reason why this sentencing has to take place prior to the election.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.

A political campaign graphic with a blue-to-red gradient background and a thin white border frame. It features a close-up photo of Donald Trump (frowning, wearing a dark suit and blue tie) on the left, and an older man with short gray hair, wearing a dark suit, white shirt, red patterned tie, and a small American flag lapel pin, on the right. At the bottom center is the "TRUMP VANCE / MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" campaign logo with stars on either side.

Text in image: REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR NH-01 ANTHONY DiLORENZO WINS! ENDORSED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP! TRUMP VANCE MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Described automatically. The words above are a machine's reading of the picture, not Trump's.

These GDP numbers were shocking. We were expecting a 2.4% growth, the actual came in at 1.6%, huge loss, and with rising inflation, even the Fed is admitting that inflation is not only sticky, but it seems to be going in the wrong direction. That adds up to stagflation. I know, and I was preparing myself for your using that word, because that's something we haven't seen since the 1970s.

Transcribed automatically. Expect errors in names and numbers.